|
<br />~32J3
<br />
<br />2/23/60
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />!
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />11
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I
<br />1
<br />
<br />J
<br />I
<br />I
<br />i
<br />1
<br />!
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />!
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />f
<br />I
<br />i
<br />I
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />I
<br />
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />!
<br />I
<br />, I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />I
<br />,
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />\
<br />\
<br />..... ~ I
<br />
<br />BEfORE THE WORKMEN WOULD BE ABLE TO~COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION Of THE SYSTEM,
<br />AND WITH THIS IN MIND IT WAS HIS BELIEf IT WOULD DOUBLE THE INSTALLATION CHARGE.
<br />
<br />MR. STEVE BATORI, A MEMBER Of THE GAS CODE COMMITTEE, STATED THE COMMITTEE
<br />HAS NO OBJECTION AS TO THE SCALE Of fEES WHICH SHOULD BE CHARGED. HE BELIEVES
<br />THESE SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL. THE ONLY THING HE RECOMMENDED IS
<br />THAT THE fiNE fOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE SHOULD BE SUBSTANTIAL. WITH
<br />REfERENCE TO INSPECTIONS, MR. BATOR I STATED THE COMMITTEE BELIEVES INSPECTION A
<br />~ECESSITY, BOT THAT THE THREE INSPECTIONS AS PROPOSED COULD'8E DONE SIMULTAN-
<br />EOUSLY UNLESS THE INSTALLATIONS WERE Of SUCH A NATURE THAT PORTIONS Of IT WERE
<br />CONCEALED. If THEY ARE CONCEALED, IT WOULD BE ESSENTIAL THAT THE INSPECTION
<br />BE DONE BEfORE THE COVERING Of THE PIPES SO THE PIPES AND fiTTINGS COULD BE
<br />EXAMINED. HE fURTHER INDICATED THAT THE NATIONAL CODE SPECifiES MATERIALS fOR
<br />PIPING AND fiTTINGS, AND THAT THE MAJOR DANGER IS IN THE CONCEALED PLACES If
<br />THE WORK IS NOT DONE PROPERLY. WITH REfERENCE TO INSTALLATION HE ALSOSTATED
<br />IT WAS THE INTENT OF' THE COMMITTEE TO SUPPLEMENT MATERIALS ON A NATIONAL OR
<br />ASSOCIATION BA~IS LN THOSE AREAS WHERE QUESTIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE BASIC
<br />CODES WERE NEEDED. HE fURTHER CITED EXAMPLES WHERE NATIONAL CODES WERE EXPANDED
<br />BY CITIES TO MEET PARTICULAR NEEDS. HE F'URTHER STATED HE BELIEVES IT fS F'RE-
<br />QUENTLY THE OCCASION WHERE STATE L~WS ARE SUPPLEMENTED BY CITY ORDINANCES.
<br />
<br />WITH REF'ERENCE TO THE NUMB~R Of PEOPLE ON THE BOARD, MR. BATOR I INDICATED
<br />THERE ARE SEVEN ACTUAL BOARD MEMBERS, AND THREE EX-OF'F'ICIO MEMBERS, AND IT IS
<br />THE COMMITTEE'S BELIEf THAT WIDER REPRESENTATION ,MIGHT WELL MAKE IT EASIER TO
<br />GET ACTION ON PARTICULAR SUBJECTS. HE LIKEWISE INDICATED!~HAT IT IS NOT THE
<br />DESIRE Of THE GAS CODE F'OR MULTIPLE LICENSING, THAT A CONTRACTOR WOULD REQUIRE
<br />A LICENSE, THE WORKMAN WOULD REQUIRE A LICENSE, AND IT WAS POSSIBLE THERE WOULD
<br />BE CERTAIN STATE LICENSES. MR. BATORI CONCLUDED HIS REMARKS BY STATING HE BE-
<br />, '
<br />LIEVES THE CODE IS ESSENTIAL TO SAF'ETY BOTH F'OR THE UTILITY AND THE LIQUID
<br />PETROLEUM GAS INDUSTRY, THAT IT SHOULD BE KEPT AS A GAS SAF'ETY CODE AND THAT
<br />THE INSPECTION PORTIONS OF' IT ARE AN ESSENTIAL F'EATURE OF' THE PROGRAM.
<br />
<br />MR. GETTEY INDICATED THAT THE LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS DEALERS HAVE NO OBJECTION
<br />TO MULTIPLE INSPECTIONS AS NECESSARY, AND IN THE CASE OF' CONSTRUCTION HE 010
<br />STATE THAT ,HE HAD DETERMINED F'ROM THE STATE fiRE MARSHAL'S OF'fICE THAT THE LAW
<br />REQUIRES TH~ STATE TO CONTINUE THE INS~ECTION PROGRAM ,AND TO CHARGE fEES EVEN
<br />IF' THE CITY DOES INSPECTION ON ITS OWN.
<br />
<br />fOLLOWING SOME DiSCUssioN AfTER THIS, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY
<br />BE INSTRUCTED TO DRAW THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE PROPOSED CODE AfTER CON-
<br />F'ERENCES WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF' THE NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY, THE LIQUID PETROLEUM
<br />,GAS INDUSTRY, THE fIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S INSPECTION DEPARTMENT, AND REPRE-
<br />SENTATIVES Of THE GAS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, TO THE END THAT THE CODE BE WORKABLE
<br />AND THAT THE F'EES BE REASONABLE AND IN LINE WITH OTHERS, AND THAT SUCH A CODE
<br />BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE F'OR F'UTURE ACTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEMS 7 AND 8 OF' THE COMMITTEE
<br />REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />9. CONSIDERATION OF' LETTERS fROM DONALD HUSBAND CONCERNING OAKWAY WATER DISTRICT
<br />AND W,LLAKENZIE fiRE DISTRICT - THE CITY ATTORNEY POINTED OUT THAT IN ORDER
<br />fOR THE WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURE TO BE CARRIED OUT fOR THE OAKWAY WATER DISTRICT
<br />AND THE WILLAKENZIE fiRE DISTRICT, IT IS NECESSARY THAT ACTION START IN THE
<br />NEAR fUTURE. THE COMMITTEE GENERALLY AGREED THAT THE PRELIMINARY ACTION ON
<br />THIS MATTER SHOULD BE BROUGHT fORWARD AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.
<br />, .
<br />
<br />THE COMMITTEE fURTHER INDICATED THAT THE ADDITIONAL REQUESTS LISTED ON THE
<br />AGENDA fOR THE fEBRUARY 18, 1960 COMMITTEE MEETING AS F'OLLOWS BE BROUGHT TO
<br />THE COUNCIL AT THEIR MEETING ON FEBRUARY 23, 1960 fOR ACTION AT THAT TIME:
<br />
<br />REQUEST BY BURT JOHNSON fOR CURB SIDEWALK LOCATION ONLY ON WEST
<br />SIDE Of LAWRENCE STREET BETWEEN 23RD1AND. 24TH AVENUES
<br />
<br />REQUEST BY MANOR MOTEL, 599 EAST BROADWAY, fOR OVERLENGTH CURB CUT
<br />
<br />REQUEST BY MR. AND MRS. CARSON TO PURCHASE TWO PIECES OF' CITY
<br />, .
<br />OWNED PROPERTY NEA~ 40TH AVENUE AND WILLAMETTE STREET
<br />
<br />REQUEST BY EUGENE BOYS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION TO NAME THE LIGHTED
<br />BALLfiELD ADJACENT TO THOMAS JEffERSON JUNIOR,HIGH SCHOOL THE
<br />'fRANK A. GRAHAM FIELD'."
<br />
<br />IT WAS'MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 9 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT
<br />BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THE F'IRST THREE ITEMS LISTED
<br />IN ITEM 9 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT F'OR REF'ERRAL TO THIS COUNCIL MEETING BE HELD OVER
<br />F'OR COMMITTEE ACTION. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THE SUGGESTION OF THE EUGENE
<br />BOYS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION BE FOLLOWED AND THE BALLfiELD ADJACENT TO THE THOMAS JEfF'ER-
<br />SON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BE NAMED "FRANK A. GRAHAM FIELD". MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />-------
<br />
<br />ii
<br />11
<br />II
<br />II
<br />:;
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />"
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />1:
<br />
<br />I
<br />ji
<br />Ii
<br />:1
<br />I'
<br />i;
<br />I:
<br />I:
<br />I;
<br />,
<br />!;
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />P
<br />j ~
<br />1\
<br />i ~
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />~ r
<br />I
<br />i;
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />"
<br />1:
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />j:
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />:!
<br />
<br />:1
<br />
<br />"
<br />,:
<br />I'
<br />H
<br />"
<br />! ~
<br />i
<br />"
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />I'
<br />;!
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />ii
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />jl
<br />;i
<br />;1
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />"
<br />if
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />I
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />!,
<br />I)
<br />Ii
<br />If
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />1
<br />!
<br />I
<br />I!
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />I;
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />d
<br />!l
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />t:
<br />,I
<br />'!
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />:I
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />-
<br />
|