|
<br />ra'40
<br />
<br />3/14/60, /
<br />
<br /> !
<br /> !
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br />2 I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> f
<br /> i
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br />3 j
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> i
<br /> II
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> ,
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> j
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> /
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br />4 I
<br /> i
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> It
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br />5 I
<br /> )
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> 1
<br /> !
<br /> ,
<br /> !I
<br /> 11
<br /> 11
<br /> j'
<br />6 II
<br /> II
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> !
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> 1
<br /> :1
<br /> I
<br /> f
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> I
<br /> 1
<br /> j
<br />
<br />i
<br />l 1,1
<br />"'1
<br />
<br />2. REQUEST BY MR. AND MRS. L. B. ASHBRIDGE FOR SIDEWALK ON MONROE STREET FROM 18TH
<br />TO 19TH AVENUES - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT AT THE REQUEST OF THE COUNCIL THE PRO-
<br />PERTY OWNERS ON MONROE STREET BETWEEN 18TH AND 19TH AVENUES HAD BEEN POLLED WITH
<br />RESPECT TO THEIR WISHES CONCERNING THE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALK ON MONROE STREET.
<br />THE RESULTS OF THE POLL WERE 14% IN rAVOR, 66% AGAINST, AND 20% NOT ANSWERING.
<br />SOME DISCUSSION WAS GIVEN TO THIS MATTER, BUT IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT IT BE HELD
<br />fOR THE TIME BEING. MOTION CARRIED. UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />{
<br />3. CONSIDERATION OF BIOS RECEIVED BY PARK DEPARTMENT FOR REMOVAL OF BARN AND SMALL
<br />RESIDENCE LOCATED WITHIN THE AMAZON PARK BETWEEN 24TH AND 29TH AVENUES FACING
<br />HILYARD STREET - ,A RESUME OF THE BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE PURCHASE Of A RESIDENCE
<br />LOCATED AT 2750 HILYARD STREET AND A BARN LOCATED AT 29TH AVENUE AND HILYARD
<br />STREET WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. IT WAS INDICATED THAT MR. L. HOLEMAR OF
<br />1955 WILLAMETTE STREET HAD BID THE SUM OF $1050 fOR THE RESIDENCE, AND MR.ERVIN
<br />E. HICKS, JR., HAD BID THE SUM OF $25.00 FOR THE BARN. SINCE THESE WERE THE
<br />BEST BIDS IN THE INTEREST Or THE CITY OF EUGENE, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE BIDS BE
<br />AWARDED TO MR. HOLEMAR FOR THE HOUSE A~D TO MR. HICKS FOR THE BARN, AND THAT THE
<br />FUNDS FROM THE SALE OF THESE TWO BUILDINGS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1075 BE HELD OVER
<br />AND PLACED IN THE 1960-61 PARKS & RECREATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET. MOTION
<br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT/WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECOI'CED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEMS 1,2 AND 3 OF THE COMMITTEE
<br />REPORT BE APPROVED. -MOJIO~ ~ARRIED.
<br />
<br />4. REQUEST BY FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TO ALLOW FOUNDATION FOOTINGS TO BE PLACED IN AN
<br />ALLEY TO THE WEST AND BENEWTH THE SIDEWALK AREA IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY TO
<br />THE SOUTH AT AN APPROXIMATE DEPTH OF 10' IN THE GENERAL AREA OF BROADWAY AND
<br />HIGH STREET - IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH HAD REQUESTED THEY
<br />BE ALLOWED TO PLACE FOUNDATION FOOTINGS IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY BENEATH THE
<br />SIDEWALK TO THE ,WEST AND SOUTH OF THE EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING WITH SUCH FOOT-
<br />INGS PROJECTING INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPROXIMATELY 1'10". THE COMMITTEE
<br />RECOMMENDED APPROVAL Of THE REQUEST SUBJECT TO rHE BAPTIST CHURCH SAVING THE CITY
<br />HARMLESS f~OM ANY INJURIES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONSTRUCTION IN THE
<br />PUBLIC RIGHT-Or-WAY~ AND FURTHER SUBJECT TO A BOND BEING GIVEN TO GUARANTEE THE
<br />REPAIR ,OR REPLACEMENT or ANY PUBLIC UTILITIES WHICH MIGHT BE DISRUPTED BY SUCH
<br />fOUNDATION PLACEMENT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />5. DISCUSSION REGARDING PAVING 27TH AVENUE fROM OLIVE TO CHARNEL TON STREET'- COM-'
<br />MITTEE MEMBERS VIEWED THE SITE OF THE REQUESTED,PAVING:OF 27TH AVENUE FROM OLIVE
<br />TO CHARNEL TON STREET ON WHICH A PETITION SIGNED BY OWNERS or 50% Of THE PROPERTY
<br />TO BE ASSESSED HAD BEEN RECEIVED. FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION IT WAS RECOMMENDED
<br />THIS BE HELD AND A POLL TAKEN OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS BETWEEN CHARNEL TON AND LIN-
<br />COLN STREETS TO DETERMINE IF THE PROJECT COULD BE ENLARGED FROM OLIVE TO CHARNEL-
<br />TON TO OLIVE TO LiNCOLN STREETS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER ,SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEMS 4 AND 5 OF THE COMMITTEE RE-
<br />PORTBE APPROVED. MOTION,CARRIED.
<br />
<br />6. CONSIDERATION Of PAVING 25TH PLACE BETWEEN JEFFERSON AND MADISON STREETS - COM-
<br />MITTEE MEMBERS VIEWED 25TH PLACE AS IT RUNS BETWEEN JEFFERSON AND MADISON STREETS
<br />AND NOTED THAT THE STREET SERVES ESSENTIALLY ONE BLOCK. :IT WAS FURTHER' NOT~D THAT
<br />THE PETITION FOR THIS PAVING WAS SIGNED BY OWNERS OF 41.67% Of THE PROPERTY TO BE
<br />ASSESSED. SOME DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON THE POSSIBILITY OF CONNECTIN~ THIS JOB
<br />WITH AN EXTENSION Of 25TH PLACE TO THE EAST OF JEffERSON STREET, fOLLOWING WHICH
<br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE STREET BE PAVED AND THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INITIATING
<br />THE PROJECT BE PASSED. MOTION CARRIED, MESSRS. MOLHOLM AND SHEARER VOTING NAY,
<br />MESSRS. WILSON AND SWANSON ABSTAINING.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED ~Y MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 6 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. '
<br />
<br />7. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY GORDON A. RAMSTEAD fOR REMOVAL Of PARKING fROM WEST
<br />SIDE or OLIVE STREET BETWEEN 19TH AND 23RD AVENUES - A LETTER WAS READ rROM
<br />GORDON A. RAMSTEAD CONCERNING RESTRICTED PARKING BETWEEN 19TH AND 23RD AVENUES
<br />ON OLIVE STREET., THE LETTER INDICATED THAT OLIVE STREE~ IS NARROW AND POSES A
<br />HAZARD TO VEHICLES ATTEMPTING TO TRAVERSE THE STREET; LIKEWI~E, MR. RAMSTEAD
<br />INDICATED THAT fIRE EQUIPMENT WOULD HAVE DifFICULTY PROCEEDING SOUTHWARD ON OLIVE
<br />STREET WITH CARS PARKED ON BOTH EAST AND WEST SIDES OF THE STREET. HE rURTHER
<br />STATED THAT THERE IS NO PARTICULAR NEED rOR PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE STREET.
<br />THE TRArf"IC ENGINEER REPORTED THAT OLIVE STREET BETWEEN 19TH AND 23RO AVENUES HAS
<br />A 26' PAVED, SURFACE AND WITH 'PARKING' ON BOTH SIDES THE MINIMUM WIDTH FOR MOVING
<br />VEHICLES IS 10'. HE INDICATED TRAFFIC COUNTS HAD BEEN TAKEN FEBRUARY 17 AND 19,
<br />1960 AND THAT THE MAXIMUM 15 MINUTE CHECK IS ONE CAR EVERY MINUTE. HE rURTHER
<br />STATED THAT THERE HAD BEEN ONLY TWO ACCIDENTS FOR THIS SECTION DURING 1959 AND
<br />NO ACCIDENTS IN, 1958 NOR SO FAR IN 1960. THE TRAFfIC ENGINEER STATED HE BELIEVES
<br />MOST OF THE TRAfFIC IS GENERATED WITHIN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY Of OLIVE STREET
<br />ANO THAT THE REMOVAL Of" PARKING TO PROVIDE rOR TWO MOVING LANES OF TRAFFIC WOULD
<br />ONLY ENCOURAGE THE USE Of THE STREET AND INCREASE THE VOLUME Of TRAfrIC, AND THIS
<br />WOULD BE UNDESIRABLE 'PROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL STANDPOINT. FOR THESE REASONS, THE
<br />TRAffIC ENGINEER RECOMMENDED NO CHANGE, AND THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE
<br />REQUEST ENTERED BY MR. RAMSTEAD BE DENIED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />I'
<br />11
<br />II
<br />
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />11
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />,;
<br />'I
<br />iI
<br />:i
<br />"
<br />!i
<br />!,
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />
<br />. "
<br />:j
<br />,
<br />11
<br />ii
<br />;1
<br />"
<br />
<br />/:
<br />
<br />I ~
<br />,
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I,
<br />I'
<br />il
<br />,I
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />:1
<br />Ii
<br />ji
<br />,I
<br />,i
<br />II
<br />;(
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />J:
<br />:/
<br />~ ~
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I:
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />.'
<br />i;
<br />"
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />'i
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />II
<br />:1.
<br />
<br />i:
<br />;i
<br />II
<br />q
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />!;
<br />ii
<br />I'
<br />j'
<br />,!
<br />11
<br />II
<br />:\
<br />I,
<br />11
<br />i'
<br />(I
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />d
<br />d
<br />t
<br />:I
<br />II
<br />'\
<br />
<br />II
<br />ji
<br />.I
<br />Ii
<br />/;
<br />II
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I;
<br />II
<br />il
<br />It
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />II
<br />;1
<br />i:
<br />;1
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|