Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r364" <br /> <br />3/28/60 <br /> <br />12. PETITION FOR SANITARY SEWER IN THE AREA BETWEEN fAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD AND SKYLINE BOULEVARD AND <br />BETWEEN VICTORIA HEIGHTS AND HENDRICKS PARK - THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS INDICATED BY LETTER <br />THAT THIS PARTICULAR SEWER HAD BEEN UP fOR CONSIDERATION BEFORE, BUT HAD NOT BEEN CONSTRUCTED <br />BECAUSE IT HAD .NOT BEEN POSSIBLE PRIOR TO THIS TIME TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY RIGHTS-OF-WAY. <br />BASED ON AN EXISTING PETITION IT NOW APPEARS IT WILL BE POSSIBLE TO DESIGN A SEWER LINE TO <br />SERVE THE AREA EXTENDING UP ROSE LANE, WHICH IS NOT NOW SERVED BY CITY SEWERS, BUT ALONG WHICH <br />A MAJORITY Of THE HOUSES 'HAVE PR'~ATE LINES RUNNING INTO THE 'fAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD SEWER. THESE <br />PEOPLE, HOWEVER, HAVE NOT BEEN ASSESSED FOR A 'SEWER LINE AND IF A NEW SEWER IS CONSTRUCTED AN <br />ASSESSMENT WOULD BE MADE. THE LETTER OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS STATED HE HAD HAD SOME <br />PROTESTS FROM INDIVIDUALS ALONG ROSE LANE, BUT IN HIS BELIEF A SEWER WOULD EVENTUALLY HAVE TO <br />BE CONSTRUtTED TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY IN THIS AREA. IT WAS FURTHER INDICATED THAT I~ THE <br />OPINION OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THE SYSTEM to- WHICH SUCH A SEWER LINE WOULD CONNECT IS <br />ADEQUATE TO RECEiVE THE PROPOSED ADDITION, AND IN THE OPINION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />SUCH PETITION SHOULD BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO SECURING THE NECESSARY EASEMENTS AS DETERMINED BY <br />THE tI NAL DES I GN. I T WAS FURTHER I NO I CATED THERE ARE A NUMBER OF HOME S fTES I N THE AREA AND <br />THAT SEPTIC TANKS ARE NOT BEING ALLOWED IN THE AREA AT THE PRESENT TIME. THE COMMITTEE RECOM- <br />MENDED THAT A SEWER LINE BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE AREA SUBJECT TO THE SECURING Of 'EASEMENTS BY <br />THE PUBLIC WORKS,DEPARTMENT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 12 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />13. DISCUSSION CONCERNING AREAS WITHIN CITY LIMITS OF EUGENE AND WILLAMALANE PARK DISTRICT - A <br />MAP SHOWING AN AREA Of DUAL TAXATION Of AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF EUGENE AND ALSO WITHIN THE <br />WILLAMALANE PARK DISTRICT AS WELL AS AN AREA IN THE CITY OF EUGENE, THE WILLAMALANE PARK Dls- <br />TRIC AND THE GLENWOOD WATER DISTRICT WAS EXPLAINED TO THE COMMITTEE. IT WAS INDICATE 0 THE <br />ASSESSED VALUE OF T~IS WHOLE ~REA IS APPROXIMATELY $94,000, AND WITH RELATION TO THE WILLAMA- ' <br />LANE PARK DISTRICT, THIS IS APPROXIMATELY 1/2 OF 1% OF THE TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION Of THE <br />PARK DISTRICT. SINCE THE PARK DISTRICT HAS AN EXISTING OUTSTANDING BONDED DEBT, THERE ARE <br />THREE WAYS iN WHICH THIS SITUATION CAN BE RESOLVED, (I) THE CITY TO PAY THE BONDED DEBiT ON A <br />PROPORTIONATE BASIS, (2) LET THE PEOPLE PAY THE TAX TO RETIRE THE BONDED DEBT AND INTEREST <br />BUT NO TAX FOR OPERATION, AND (3) TO LET THE AREA 'CONTINUE TO PAY fULL TAX TO BOTH THE CITY <br />AND PARK DISTRIC~. IT WAS INDICATED THAT BASED ON A STUDY, THE TOTAL BONDED DEBT OF THE WILLAMA- <br />~ANE PARK DISTR~CT IS $338,000 AND THE PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR THIS AREA WOULD BE $82B. THE <br />COMMITTEE GAVE SOME CONSIDERATION TO'THIS AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY ASSUME THE PROPORTION <br />OF THE DEBT AND SEVER THE WHOLE OF THE AREA IN THE CITY OF EUGENE FROM OTHER JURISDICTIONS. <br />MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />.. <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 13 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />14. REQUEST BY McDONALD CANDY COMPANY FOR VACATION OF RAILROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON SOUTH SIDE <br />. -Of LOT 3, AND 75' Of LOT 2, BLOCK I, EUGENE INDUSTRIAL TRACT - A LETTER FROM THE McDONALD <br />CANDY COMPANY WAS READ IN WHICH IT WAS REQUESTED THAT A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR RAILROAD <br />AND UTILITY PURPOSE BE VACATED TO ALLOW fOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON THE <br />ABOvE ,DESCRIBED PROPERTY WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE McDONALD CANDY COMPANY WOULD DEDICATE <br />A NEW RAILROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA. THE LETTER FURTHER STATED THAT THE EUGENE INDUS- <br />TRIAL DEVELOPMENT 'CORPORATION AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY HAVE APPROVED THE PLAN'AND RE- <br />QUESTED THAT THE VACATION AS REQUESTED BE APPROVED. THE COMMITTEE OBSERVED A PLAN OF THE <br />EUGENE INDUSTRIAL TRACT SHOWING THE EASEMENT AREA AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE VACATION BE <br />GRANTED., MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />41 <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />r <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 14 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROvED. <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />15. PETITION PROTESTING REASSESSMENT OF SEWERS IN VICINITY Of ORCHARD STREET'AND 17TH AVENUE - <br />MR. LEROY BURCHAM APPEARED AS A SPOKESMAN fOR PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE VICINITY Of ORCHARp <br />STREET FROM 17TH AVENUE TO fAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD AND ALONG fAIRMOUNT~BoULEVARD TO SUMMIT AVE- <br />NUT AND PRESENTED A PETITION CONTA.INING NAMES OF FORTY SIGNERS PROTESTING THE COUNCIL'S DECISION <br />TO CHANGE THE CITY'S LONG EXISTING OBLIGATION OF PAYING FOR SEWER REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR WITH <br />FUNDS P~ID IN ON A MONTHLY BASIS BY Tt:JE PROPERTY OWNERS FOR SUCH REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT. THE' <br />PETITION FURTHER INDICATES THE PETITIONERS 00 NOT aELI~VE IT IS PROPER TO REASSESS fOR FACI~I- <br />TIES WHICH HAVE LONG BEEN PAID FOR AND FURTHER STATED THEY 00 NOT BELIEvE A CHANGE OF POLICY <br />OF LONG STANDING TO BE PROPER WITHOUT ~ PUBLIC HEARING. <br /> <br />MR. BURCSAMMAMPLlflED THE WRITTEN PETITION WHICH WAS PRESENTED INDICATING TO HIS KNOWLEDGE <br />THERE HAD ONLY BEEN ONE CALL FOR MAINTENANCE ON THE SEWER LINE IN THIS AREA IN THE PAST <br />fiVE YEARS, AND fURTHER SUGGESTED THAT THE REAL CAUSE OF THE REPLACEMENT Of THE LINE IF THE <br />NECESSARY EXTENSIONS WHICH ARE BEING CONTEMPLATED AT THIS TIME. <br /> <br />fOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM, IT WAS RECOMMENDED IT BE RECEIVED AND THAT fURTHER <br />ACTION BE DELAYED PENDING THE OBTAINING OF COST ESTIMATES fOR REPAIR WORK AND OTHER ITEMS <br />THAT HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED ON THIS SEWER LINE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />I.T WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAfFEY THAT ITEM 15 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. <br /> <br />THE DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS REPORTED THAT ON THE SEWER IN THIS AREA THERE HAD BEEN FIFTEEN CALLS IN <br />APPROXIMATELY THE PAST TWO YEARS AND THAT IN ONE AREA A 22' SECTION HAD BEEN REPLACED AT A COST Of <br />$415.00. HE FURTHER REPORTED THAT IN HIS OPINION AND UPON INVESTIGATION OF THIS LINE, THE LINE IS <br />MALFUNCTIONING AND IS IN SERIOUS NEED OF REPLACEMENT. <br /> <br />\ <br />~J <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />iT <br />II <br />\1 <br />Ii <br />I ~ <br />Ii <br />II <br />I <br />Ii <br />,I <br />il <br />II <br />II <br />j <br />!I <br /> <br />-- <br />,! <br />'I <br />il <br />~ ; <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />ii <br />~ I <br />ii <br />'i <br />II <br />II <br />(I <br />Ii <br />II <br />,I <br />Ii <br />II <br />:! <br />Ii <br />I' <br />!I <br />11 <br />II <br />Ij <br />!I <br />I, <br />I' <br />I' <br />" <br />1 <br />: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />:, <br />" <br />:i <br />Ii <br />II <br />L <br />" <br />II <br />1\ <br />II <br />I <br />'I <br />II <br />I- <br />I <br />" <br />i <br />! <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />t\ <br />J; <br />Ii <br />i <br />Ii <br />I, <br />I. <br /> <br />I: <br />I <br />i' <br />,I <br />II <br />II <br />I. <br />1I <br />il <br />I' <br />!I <br />II <br />II <br />!; <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- <br />