03/28/1960 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r::.~ [~ (.'I), r ~)f()O 3/28/60 e 2. FUTURE INSTALLATION or PUBLIC UTILITIES AND/OR ST~EET PAVING WOULD or NECESSITY CAUSE SEVERE DAMAGE TO EXISTING SIDEWALKS 3. RIGHT-OF-WAY WHICH IS INSUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE A SIDEWALK ON ONE OR BOTH SIDES OF STREET 4. TOPOGRAPH OR CONTROUS MAKE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK IMPRACTICAL 5. Ir THE OWNER, BUILDER OR CONTRACTOR CONSIDERS THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK IM- PRACTICAL rOR ANy OTHER REASON THAN THOSE LISTED ABOVE, THE EUGENE PLANNI~G COM- MISSION SHALL RECOMMEND WHETHER A PERMIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE MAY BE GRANTED. 6. WHEN 50% OR MORE or THE PROPERTIES ON A CITY BLOCK SHALL HAVE INSTALLED ~IDEWALKS, THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SHALL REQUEST THE CITY COUNCIL TO ORDER THE INSTALLA- TION OF SIDEWALKS ON ALL OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE BLOCK WHICH ARE OCCUP'ED BY A DWELLING OR COMMERCIAL UNIT. 7. IN CASES I AND 2 ABOVE, THE NON-COMPLIANCE IS PRESUME~ TO BE TEMPORARY, WHEN GRADES ARE ESTABLISHED lOR ~HE UTILITIES IN QUESTION ARE INSTALLED SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED.II IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THE REPORT or THE PLANNING COMMISSION BE RE- CEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE AND BE BROUGHT UP rOR STUDY AT A COMMITTEE SESSION. MOTION CARRIED. , ' A REPORT OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD MARCH 16, 1960 ~AS SUBMITTED AND R~AD AS FOLLOWS: "A,SPECIAL MEETING OF' THE BOARD OF ApPEALS WAS HELD MARCH 16, 1960 AT 8:30 AM. MEMBERS PRESENT WERE DR. CHRISTENSEN, MR. ,PERKINS, MR. BALZHISER AND MR. HENDERSHOTT. I. A McDoNALD CANDY COMPANY REQUEST ,rOR A WA I VER OF Bu I LD I NG CODE PROV I S IONS, WHICH REQUIRES AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLING ,SYSTEM IN THE PROPOSED NEW ,WAREHOUSE TO BE BUILT IN EUGENE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AREA. IT WAS MOVED BY MR. CHRISTENSEN AND SECONDED BY MR. PERKINS THAT THE REQUEST FOR THIS WAIVER BE DENIED fOR THE rOLLOWING REASONS: (A) ALL OF OTHER INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGSINTHE AREA, or SIZE AND SPEClrICA- TIONS REQUIRING THEM TO HAVE SPRINKLERS, HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CODE AND HAVE BEEN,BUILT WITH AUTOMATIC S~RINKLING SYSTEMS. (B) Ir A VARIANCE WAS GRANTED ,TO McDONALD CANDY COMPANY, VARIANCE OF THIS REQUIREMENT or THE BUILDING CODE IN REGARD TO SPRINKLERS SHOULD BE GRANTED TO ALL OTHER PERSONS MAKING A REQUEST THEREFORE. I , 1 , I I I I (C) THE SUGGESTED COST OF' $10,000.00 FOR THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS A SM~LL COST COMPARED TO THE COST or THE REST OF THE BUILDING. (0) THE McDoNALD CANDY COMPANY CAN PUT INA MASONRY BLOCK WALL WITH FIRE DOORS IN THE WALL AND DiViDE UP THIS WAREHOUSE AREA, SO THAT THEY NEED NOT COME WITHIN THE PROVISIONS REQUIRING AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLING SYSTEM. THIS CAN PROBABLY BE DONE FOR ABOUT ONE HALr THE COST OF AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLING SYSTEM. (E) AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLING SYSTEM PROVIDES A CHEAP 24 HOUR WATCHMAN SERviCE TO THE OWNER OR OCCUPANT OF THE BUILDING 2. REQUEST Of THE SCHLESINGER BUILDING AT BR~DWAY AND OLIVE TO WAIVE THE THREE rOOT SETBACK FROM THE ALLEY. IT WAS MOVED BY MR. BALZHISER AND SECONDED BY DR. CHRISTENSEN THAT THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE BE GRANTED. IT WAS PASSED UNANIMOUSLY." IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOL HOLM THAT THE REPORT Of THE SPECIAL MEETING Of THE BoARD or ApPEALS BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON riLE. MOTION CARRIED. (ACTION TAKEN ON ITEMS UNDER COM- MITTEE REPORT OF MARCH 18, 1960.) .PETITION S AND COMMUNICATIONS 2 COMMUNICATION DATED MARCH 23, 1960 FROM SALEM SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY REGARDING CONTRACT FOR CON- STRUCTION OF WEST EUGENE SANITARY TRUNK SEWER WAS PRESENTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS: I'WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED CONTRACT DATED,MARCH 18, 1960 PROVIDING fOR THE CON- STRUCTION OF WEST EUGENE SANITARY TRUNK SEWER, WE FEEL THAT THE FOLLOWING CHANGES ARE IN ORDER: I. THE CONTRACT PROVIDES, THAT IN CASE Of ANY MIS~NDERSTANDING OR DISACREEMENT BETWEEN THE CONTRACTOR AND THE CITY ENGINEER AS TO THE INTERPRETATION Of THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE MATTER SHALL BE REFERRED TO THE CITY MANAGER AND/OR COMMON COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, WHOSE DECISION WILL BE BINDING ON THE PARTIES. THIS SHOULD BE CHANGED TO PROVIDE \ ~Ji 1< " 1 1 Ii j: Ii :i I! 11 :i II 11 II :1 ;, I I ~ I ii " Ii I, I' :i I, i\ !J Ii q 11 11 II II 1.1 It Ii ~ , q Ii J, I! I'; p 'I II II il I! \, 'I !I rI II ji I: I i i. I I, I e I I :1 :1 " il I' II 11 Ij I: I) Ii Ii 11 t ~ ! " ,I ;1 I t I e I e