|
<br />00
<br />N
<br />~ I .
<br />U ,
<br />"
<br />~ I
<br />CO
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> I'
<br /> Ii
<br />1 Ii
<br />,1
<br />[1
<br /> Ii
<br /> :1
<br /> "
<br /> :!
<br /> ,
<br /> I
<br /> 'I
<br /> I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br /> ~, i
<br /> II
<br /> ':
<br /> .1
<br /> I
<br /> "
<br /> 2
<br /> 'I
<br /> 1
<br />1 'I
<br /> 'I
<br /> I,
<br /> "
<br /> '.
<br /> 'I
<br /> ,I
<br />e
<br /> 3
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />"
<br />:
<br />,
<br />4
<br />
<br />,393 ~
<br />
<br />4/25/60
<br />
<br />'i
<br />I,
<br />il
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />A REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD APRIL 21, 1960 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MOLHOLM, MCGAffEY, CHATT, MOYER, WILSON AND
<br />SWANSON; CITY MANAGER; ASSISTANT CITY RECORDER; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; CHIEf Of
<br />POLICE; TRAfFIC ENGINEER; DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS; SUPERINTENDENT Of PARKS &
<br />RECREATION; CITY ATTORNEY; FRED BRENNE, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; SEVERAL REPRESENTATIVES
<br />OF THE SALVATION ARMY; SEVERAL INTERESTED CITIZENS; DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD.
<br />
<br />"
<br />,
<br />,I
<br />
<br />RECREATIONAL fACILITIES FOR THE AGED - A LETTER ADD~ESSED TO MR. SHEARER, COUNCIL PRESI-
<br />DENT, FROM MRS. A. W. ROECKER, PRESIDENT OF THE EMERALD EMPIRE COUNCIL FOR THE AGING,
<br />WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE IN WHICH IT WAS INDICATED THEY ARE THINKING Of BUILDING THEIR
<br />OWN CENTER AND WOULD LIKE TO KNOW If THE CITY Of EUGENE WOULD DONATE CITY PARK LAND FOR
<br />SUCH A PURPOSE, PROVIDED SUCH A BUILDING COULD BE USED AT TIMES FOR ACTIVITIES SPONSORED
<br />BY THE PARKS PROGRAM. THE LETTER STATED THAT If THE ,BUILDING WERE A REALITY, IT COULD
<br />BE USED IN PART BY THE CITY PARKS PROGRAM, AND THE QUESTION WAS RAISED AS TO WHETHER THE
<br />CITY WOULD CONSIDER TAKING OVER ALL OR PART OF THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH A ICENTER. THE
<br />LETTER ALSO INDICATED THAT THE 10-YEAR PARK PROGRAM MIGHT INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE, If NOT
<br />SEVERAL, RECREATION CENTERS WHICH COULD BE SCHEDULED fOR TWO OR THREE DAYS A WEEK USE
<br />EXCLUSIVELY fOR OLDER PEOPLE.
<br />
<br />:\
<br />II
<br />il
<br />I;
<br />il
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />[I
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />11
<br />ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />\1
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />I:
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />il
<br />11
<br />'I
<br />I'
<br />i!
<br />Ii
<br />:i
<br />II
<br />:\
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />'.
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />11
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />i[
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />\1
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />il
<br />I
<br />)
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />\1
<br />
<br />:I~
<br />
<br />,I
<br />
<br />I
<br />"
<br />1
<br />,
<br />
<br />:1
<br />1
<br />"
<br />I
<br />,
<br />"
<br />"
<br />r
<br />
<br />.
<br />A LETTER fROM MR. SHEARER IN REPLY STATED THAT HE IS IN fAVOR Of PROVIDING SOME TYPE Of
<br />fACILITY fOR THE USE Of OLDER PEOPLE, AND IT IS HIS fEELING THAT THIS IS JUST AS IMPOR-,
<br />TANT AS PROVIDING SWIMMING POOLS AND OTHER fORMS Of RECREATIONAL fACILITIES fOR YOUNGER
<br />PEOPLE.
<br />
<br />I.:
<br />
<br />THE CITY ATTORNEY STATED THAT If A BUILDING WERE TO BE BUILT ON CITY PROPERTY, SUCH
<br />BUILDING WOULD NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE OWNED BY THE CITY; HOWEVER, If THE CITY DEEDED
<br />LAND TOA GROUP, IT WOULD BE ~HEIRS TO BUILD THEIR fACILITY, AND AfTER IT WAS BUILT THE
<br />fACILITY WOULD BE THEIRS. HE ADVISED AGAINST DEEDING LAND TO ANY PARTICULAR GROUPS AS
<br />A MATTER OF POLICY SINCE IT WOULD BE SETTING A PRECEDENT BY fAVORING A GROUP BY GIVING
<br />PUBLIC LAND.
<br />
<br />,I
<br />
<br />FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION IN WHICH SOME COMMITTEE MEMBERS INDICATED THERE IS MUCH NEED
<br />fOR SOME TYPE Of RECREATION fACILITY fOR THE AGED, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED~HAT THE
<br />PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION AND THE PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BE REQUESTED TO
<br />STUDY TH; PROBLEM OF PROVIDING PUBLIC,fACIUTIES fOR THE AGED AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS
<br />TO THE COUNCIL fOR FACILITIES AND fiNANCING, AND REQUESTED THAT THE PARKS & R~CREATION
<br />COM~ISSION REPORT aHEIR fiNDINGS BACK TO THE COUNCIL COMMITTEE WITHIN A PERIOD Of SIXTY
<br />DAYS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. CHATTTHAT ITEM I Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED.
<br />MOll ON CARR I ED.
<br />
<br />2. CONSIDERATION Of REPORT OF BOARD OF ApPEALS - APRIL 13, 1960:
<br />A. REQUEST BY STEARNS BROTHERS, BUILDERS, FOR VARIANCE fROM 10' FRONT PROPERTY SETBACK
<br />AND 3' REAR PROPERTY SETBACK TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION ON PROPERTY LINE IN C-I ZONE AT 1034
<br />MILL STREET - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT STEARNS BROTHERS, BUILDERS, WERE REQUESTING
<br />A VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN, 8-STORY APARTMENT BUILDING WITH Off-STREET
<br />PARKING AT 1034 MILL STREET. AFTER SOME DI6CUSSION DURING WHICH IT WAS BROUGHT
<br />OUT THAT ALL THE PROPERTY WAS ZONED C-3 WITH THE EXCEPTIONOf THE TWO WHICH ARE IN
<br />A C-I ZONE, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE BoARD OF ApPEALS REPORT BE APPROVED
<br />GRANTING THE VARIANCE. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCILMEN lAURIS; MOLHOLM AND WILSON
<br />VOTING NAY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR.CHATT THAT ITEMS 2A OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED.
<br />MOTION CARRIED, MR. WILSON VOTING NAY.
<br />
<br />B. REQUEST BY CARL GILBERT, 221 HARLOW ROAD, fOR VARIANCE IN LOT WIDTH FROM 60' TO
<br />38.67' IN RA ZONE - AfTER SOME DISCUSSION IN WHICH IT WAS BROUGHT OUT THAT THIS
<br />LOT IS VERY NARROW AND NOT A STANDARD LOT fOR BUILDING PURPOSES, THE COMMITTEE
<br />RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD Of ApPEALS REPORT DENYING THE REQUESTED VARIANCE BE
<br />APPROVED. MOll ON CARR I ED, COUNCI,LMAN MOLHOLM ABSTA I N I NG.
<br />
<br />,
<br />,I
<br />I
<br />J
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />'[
<br />,
<br />!' BE
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />,
<br />'i
<br />!
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />"
<br />I
<br />.'
<br />
<br />C. REQUEST BY 8&F INVESTMENT COMPANY FOR VARIANCE FROM 1200 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT
<br />REQUIREMENT fOR APARTMENTS IN R~3 ZONE AT NORTHWEST CORNER Of 17TH AND FERRY -
<br />IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE B&F INVESTMENT COMPANY IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO
<br />ALLOW CONSTRUCTION Of A 10-UNIT APARTMENT AND THAT THIS VARIANCE WOULD BE fROM
<br />THE 1200 SQUARE FOOT. PER UNIT REQUIREMENT fOR APARTMENTS IN AN R-3 ZONE. AFTER
<br />NOTING THE BOARD Of ApPEALS REPORT WHICH STATED THAT THE PROPOSED PARKING ON
<br />THE FERRY STREET SIDE WOULD CAUSE CARS TO BACK OUT OVER THE SIDEWALK AND WOULD
<br />BE 'OANGERO~S TO PEDESTRIANS, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE ACTION OF THE
<br />BOARD OF ApPEALS RECOMMENDING DENIAL Of THE REQUEST BE APPROVED. MOTION CAR-
<br />RIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />I T WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEMS 2B AND 2C OF THE COMM ITTEEREPORT
<br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
|