|
<br />~'9'6"
<br />'0
<br />
<br />4/25/60
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />HOSPITALITY HOUSE: A HOSPITALITY HOUSE IS AN ELEEMOSYNARY INSTITUTION, THE
<br />PRIMARY fUNCTION OF WHICH IS THE LODGING AND/OR FEEDING
<br />OF INDIGENT, ADULT PERSONS."
<br />
<br />"AT A SPECIAL MEETING Of THE EUGENE ClTyPLANNING COMMISSION, APRIL 18, 1960, THE
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION BEGS TO MAKE THE fOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COUNCIL:
<br />
<br />VACATION OF RAILROAD EASEMENT REQUESTED BY McDoNALD CANDY COMPANY IN EUGENE
<br />INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TRACT
<br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS TO THE COUNCIL THAT NO ACTION BE TAKEN TO
<br />VACATE THE RAILROAD EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE McDoNALD PROPERTY
<br />UNLESS AND UNTIL SUFfiCIENT LAND IS OBTAINED BY THE McDoNALD CANDY COMPANY TO
<br />CONTINUE AND EXTEND THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR SATISfACTORY DEVELOPMENT Of
<br />THE LAND TO THE EAST.
<br />
<br />WINN, SHINN & CO.
<br />REQUESTED-VACATION OF A NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY BETWEEN 16TH AVENUE AND THE AMAZON,
<br />DRAINAGE DJTCH AND BETWEEN WILLAMETTE STREET AND OAK STREET
<br />
<br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS TO THE COUNCIL THAT THE ALLEY BE VACATED
<br />SUBJECT TO THE RETENTION OF UTILITY EASEMENT WHICH SHOULD EXIST UNTIL THE
<br />PROPERTY OWNER OR OWNERS WOULD BE WILLING TO PAY THE PRJCE OF MOVING THE SEWAGE
<br />LINE AND THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.
<br />
<br />ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF EUGENE
<br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPERTY OWNED BY WAYNE AND
<br />MARIAN BRUMBACH; JAMES S. ANDERSON; BRYCE NOSLER AND JOHN TIFFANY, SOUTH Of
<br />PAIGE AVENUE IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 18 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, W.M., ABUTTING
<br />THE PRESENT CITY LIMITS Of EUGENE, BE APPROVED FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY."
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT_THE REPORTS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION BE
<br />CE I "lED AND PLACED ON fiLE. MOTl ON CARR I ED. (AcTI ON TAKEN ON I TE'MS ,I N REPORTS UNDER COMM I TTEE
<br />DATED APRIL 21, 1960.)
<br />
<br />A REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS DATED APRIL 13, 1960 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"THE BOARD Of ApPEALS HELD A MEETING AT THE CITY HALL, APRIL 13, 1960. MEMBERS PRE-
<br />SENT WERE MR. HENDERSHOTT, MR. BALZHISER AND MR. PERKINS.
<br />
<br />I. STEARNS BROTHERS BUILDERS REQUEST A VARIANCE FROM THE TEN jlO) FEET REQUIRED
<br />SETBACK FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE IN, A C-I ZONE, TO 'CONSTRUCT AN EIGHT
<br />STORY APARTMENT BUILDING WITH OfF STREET PARKING UNDER THE BUILDING GROUND
<br />LEVEL AT 1034 MILL STREET.
<br />
<br />THEY ARE ALSO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED THREE (3), FEET SETBACK
<br />ON ALLEYS TO BUILD THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE DIRECTLY ON THE PROPERTY LINE ON
<br />BOTH THE fRONT AND REAR PROPERTY LINES.
<br />
<br />AFTER DISCUSSING THE MATTER TO SOME LENGTH AND TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THAT
<br />ALL THE PROPERTY WAS ZONED C-3 WITH THEEXCEPTION OF THE TWO WHICH ARE IN A C-I
<br />ZONE, MR.BALZHISER MADE A MOTION AND MR. PERKINS SECONDED THAT BOTH VARIANCES
<br />BE GRANTED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />2. MR. CARL GILBERT, 221 HARLOW ROAD, REQUESTS A VARIANCE FROM THE SIXTY (60)
<br />fEET AVERAGE WIDTH REQUIRED FOR LOTS TO DIVIDE ONE PORTION Of THE PROPERTY
<br />I NTO A LO,T 38.67 t X 162.26'.
<br />
<br />AfTER DISCUSSING THE MATTER, MEMBERS FELT THAT IN DOING THIS IT WOULD BE A
<br />VERY NARROW LOT AS WELL AS SUBSTANDARD. DUE TO THIS ,FACT, MR. BALZHI.SER MADE
<br />A MOTION AND MR. HENDERSHOTT SECONDED THAT THE REQUEST BE DENIED. MOTION
<br />CARRIED.
<br />
<br />3. THE B & F INVESTMENT COMPANY REQUESTS A VARIANCE ,fROM THE 1200 SQUARE FOOT
<br />PER UNIT REQUIREMENTS FOR APARTMENTS IN AN R-3 ZONE TO CONSTRUCT A TEN UNIT
<br />APARTMENT.
<br />
<br />AFTER VIEWING THE PLOT PLAN IT WAS THE FEELING OF ALL
<br />PROPOSED PARKING SETUP ON THE FERRY STREET SIDE, CARS
<br />THE SIDEWALK WH1CH COULD BE DANGEROUS TO PEDESTRIANS.
<br />CREATED A CROWDED CONDITION IN GENERAL.
<br />
<br />MEMBERS THAT DUE TO THE
<br />WOULD BE BACKING OUT OVER
<br />THEY ALSO FELT IT
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />i
<br />I
<br />,
<br />I
<br />!
<br />\
<br />I
<br />I
<br />:,
<br />
<br />~~I,
<br />'I
<br />I:
<br />
<br />MR. PERKINS MADE A MOTION AND IT WAS SECOl'()ED BY MR. BALZHISER THAT THE RE-
<br />QUEST FOR THE VARIANCEBE DENIED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />THERE BEING NO fURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED."
<br />
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />!
<br />I
<br />\
<br />[I
<br />;
<br />II
<br />I
<br />ii
<br />I,
<br />ii
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br /> I,
<br /> ,
<br /> j!
<br /> ,
<br /> !;
<br /> "
<br /> I
<br /> 'I
<br /> I'
<br /> 'I
<br /> il e
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> 01
<br /> II
<br /> ,
<br /> Ii
<br /> I
<br /> ,;
<br /> I'
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> Ii
<br /> "
<br /> I'
<br /> "
<br /> It
<br /> 11
<br />RE- il
<br />REPORT II
<br /> .l,
<br /> ':
<br /> II
<br /> Ii
<br /> iI
<br /> I:
<br /> I:
<br /> ,:
<br /> ::
<br /> "
<br /> I,
<br /> Ii
<br /> i;
<br /> "
<br /> i:
<br /> I'
<br /> I:
<br /> ,
<br /> I,
<br /> ii
<br /> I,
<br /> "
<br /> ,
<br /> i'
<br /> I'
<br /> I
<br /> I'
<br /> "
<br /> j, 1
<br /> "
<br /> i!
<br /> "I
<br /> ;,
<br />
<br />.I
<br />,
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />I:
<br />I!
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />d
<br />I
<br />II
<br />l'
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />:i
<br />11
<br />.j
<br />'i
<br />I
<br />j
<br />I
<br />11
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />~
<br />
<br />il
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT THE REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS BE RECEIVED
<br />AND PLACED ON fiLE. MOTION CARRIED, (ACTION TAKEN ON ITEMS IN REPORT UNDER COMMITTEE REPORT OF
<br />APRIL 21, 1960.) COUNCILMAN WILSON VOTING NAY.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|