|
<br />r4- "1 4
<br /> e
<br /> --
<br /> ~~------- -
<br /> - ' 11 ' '
<br /> ADMISSION FEE TO THE ANNUAL RHODODENDRON SHOW - THE COMMITTEE WAS INFORMED THAT A REQUEST WAS II
<br /> RECEIVED FROM THE EUGENE RHODODENORON SOCIETY THAT THEY BE PERMITTED TO CHARGE ADMISSIONS TO THE 11 I
<br /> II
<br /> Ii ANNUAL RHODODENDRON SHOW SPONSORED BY-THEIR GROUP AT HENDRICKS PARK, THE ADMISSIONS TO BE USED II
<br /> '70 BUILD A DISPLAY SHELTER IN'THE RHODODENDRON GARDEN FOR THE RHODODENDRON SHOW AND OTHER PUBLIC I'
<br /> i THE COMMITTEE AGREED THAT THIS WAS A REASONABLE REQUEST AND THAT SIMilAR REQUESTS SHOULD "
<br /> I USES. !'
<br /> I BE GIVEN FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION. I
<br /> I THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE P.ROP,ER CITY OFFICIALS PROCEED TO DRAW UP A FORMAL AGREEMENT
<br /> i
<br /> II WITH THE EUGENE RHODODENDRON SOCIETY, SUCH AGREEMENT TO'BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL COMMITTEE AT
<br /> A LATER DATE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br /> I
<br /> I IT WAS MOVE;D BY MR~: SHEARER AND SECONDED 'BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM 3 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT it
<br /> r :1
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION:CARRIED. /,
<br /> :1
<br /> t.
<br /> ,.
<br /> ARCHITECTJS COMPETITION FOR NEW CITY HALL -' DEAN GORDON EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD HAD I
<br />I 4. CONVERSATIONS i!
<br /> j WITH THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE REGARDING A PROCEDURES MANUAL WHICH HE IS COMPILING AND WHICH WILL Ii
<br /> BE SENT TO ALL ARCHITECTS IN THE STATE Of OREGON, INVITING THEM TO COMPETE ON THE PLANS fOR A "
<br /> I . . 1.- .
<br /> NEW CITY HALL. HE STATED THAT, AfTER I!:RSONALLY INSPECTING THE AREA, HE 'WAS CONCERNED REGARDING I'
<br /> I "
<br /> THE ,C&S ELECTRIC BUILDING, WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE PROPOSED SITE AND PRESENTS MANY PROBLEMS TO II
<br /> i!
<br /> ARCHITECTS ON ENTRANCES, EX /TS, PARKING ~ND THE CHARACTER OF THE NEW BUILDI~G, IT If IS ALLOWED " e
<br /> II
<br /> I TO REMAIN ON, THE PRESENT SITE. HE STATED THAT HE DID NOT fEEL THAT ARCHITECTS SHOULD BE HANDI- Ii
<br /> I CAPPED BY ANY RESTRICTI0NS 'WHI'Cl:H WOULD REQUIRE THAT J.HE C&S BUIl::DING REMAIN AT ITS PRESENT LOCA- II
<br /> i!
<br /> I TION, AND THAT THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE PLANS FINALLY CHOSEN WILL NOT REQUIRE THAT THE NEW it
<br /> i CITY HALL BUILDING BE ON GROUNDS WHERE THE C&S BUIL.DING IS NOW LOCATED. ' ONE MEMBER OF THE COM- 'I
<br /> I !I
<br /> j MITTEE fELT THAT THE C&S BUILDING SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO REMAIN SINCE IT IS A 'SOL IDSTRUCTURE ,\
<br /> "
<br /> IS WORTH APPROXIMATELY $75,000. ,
<br /> WHICH I
<br /> I AfTER SOME DISCUSSION, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMMENDEDTHAT, fOR PURPOSES OF THE COMPETITION; TH~ :1 I
<br /> ! ARCHITECTS BE AUTHORIZED TO USE THE ENTIRE BLOCKWI:tH NO RESTRICTIONS. - MonON' CARRIED, MR. SWAN- I
<br /> I
<br /> SON VOT I NG :NAY. "
<br /> THE COMMITTEE SEEMED TO BE 'IN GEtlRAL' AGREEMENT THAT, 'WHILE FOR PURPOSES OF THE COMPETITION, I;
<br /> 1 "
<br /> THE C&S BUILDI'NGWOULD BE DISREGARDED, fiNAL DETERMINATION Of I TS fATE WOULD BEDEC IDEO AFTER "
<br /> ! 'I
<br /> \
<br /> THE'COMPETITION. II
<br /> "
<br /> IT :WAS A:LSO EXP'LAINE:D THAT'THE TIME SCHEDULE Of THE ARCHITECT'S COMPETITION W:>ULD, NO_T ALLOW I'
<br /> II I,
<br /> II
<br /> A fINAL AWARD TO BE MADE UNTIL APPROXIMATELY MARCH I', 1961. THE MATTER OF" PLA'C I NG THE REQUEST !I
<br /> I,
<br /> FOR fUNDS FOR A NEW CITY HALL ON THE NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT WAS DISCUSSED, AND IT WAS II
<br /> GENERALLY AGREED THAT '/T- WOULD BE BEST TO POSTPONE A VOTE ON THIS MATTER UNTIL THE ARCHITECT'S i:
<br /> I ,I
<br /> I COMPEITION HA6 BEEN COMPLETED. No ACTION WAS TAKEN. ,\
<br /> I II
<br /> II AfTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION, IN WHICH MR. SWANSON STATEO THAT HE WOULD PREfER TO HAVE THE Ii
<br /> Ii
<br /> II C&S ELECiFRIC BUILDING RECOGNIZED IN THE ARCH'ITECT'S COMPETITION, AND IF POSSI.BLE', PLAN THE NEW II
<br /> II CITY HALL AROUND IT SO THAT I T WOULD NOT HAVE'K> BE REMOVED, IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND 11
<br /> II SECONDED BY MR. MCGAfFEY THAT ITEM 4 Of THE COMMlrTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. MOT~ON CARRIED, MR. 'i
<br /> SWANSON ,VOTING _NAV. _ . Ii
<br /> Ii - ' ,
<br /> II II
<br /> Ii
<br />2 II 5. PERMANENT REPORT OF PLANNING 'COMMISSION - JUNE 21, 1960 - DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THE 'REZONING OF r
<br /> THE WI LLAKENZ I E ARE A ANNEXED TO -:-THE 'C I TY AND SPEC I AL SETBACKS f"OR FUTURE STREET 'W I DEN I NG. IT
<br /> !I WAS EXPLAINED THAT AT ~HE PLANNI~G COMMISSION MEETING OF 'JUNE 21, 1960, .THE QUESTION OF ZONING THE Ii
<br /> WILLAKENZIE AREA HAD BEEN DISCUSSED AT LENGTH, AND THAT' RES I DENTS OF THE AREA WHO WERE IN ATTEN- ~ I
<br /> I,
<br /> DANCE AT THE MEETING HAD EXPRESSED GENERAL APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ZONING AS OUTLINED 'BY THE It
<br /> I, PLANNING COMMISSION. IT WAS ALSO EXPLAINED THAT SINCE COUNTY ZONING EXPIRES IN THE WILLAKENZIE
<br /> 'I Ii
<br /> :1 I~ WOULD 'BE ADVISAB~E,TOHAVE THE CITY ZONING GO I
<br /> 'I AREA ON JULY 19, 1960, IMTO EFFECT ON OR BE~OR~ ;
<br /> 'I ,:
<br /> I, THAT DATE. THERE WAS CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION REGARDING THE COUNTY'S PLANS FOR FINISHI~G THE r
<br /> 'I PA V I NG AND W I DEN fNG OF COBURG ROA'D FROM THE FERR~ STREET BR lOGE TO HARLOW ROAD AND IT WAS STATED
<br /> I, ;
<br /> II THAT THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ARE OBJECTING TO THE COST OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SKILLERN PROPERTY L:
<br /> Ii
<br /> il LOCATED AT THE JJNC-TION OF COBURG ROAD AND HARLOW ROAD. i
<br /> THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ~HAT THE PERMANENT REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION REZONING THE I'
<br /> WILLAKENZIE AREA aE APPROVED. MOTIO~ CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ii
<br /> , . - THE COMM'/T-TEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE- PROPER:CI-TYOFFICIALSCONSULT WITH THE' COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
<br /> 'I
<br /> ON THE IR PLANS FOR 'PAV I NG AND WI DEN I NG. COBURG ROAD AND AN ATTEMPT BE MADE TO SECURE A WR I TrEN "
<br /> I H tit
<br /> i AGREEMENT WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THE COUNTY TO COMPLETE TH'E PROJECT AS THEY HAD VERBALLY P'ROM'ISED I,
<br /> I Ii
<br /> !I AFTE~ THE ANNEXATION OF THE AREA. MOT ION CARR I ED UNAN IMO'USL Y. ii
<br /> Ii
<br /> Ii IT WAS'MOVE:D BY MR:. SHEARER AND ,SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR'I S THAT ITEM 5 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT
<br /> P
<br />iJ BE APPROVED. ,MOT I ON CARR I ED. I'
<br /> I, II
<br />J II 6. CONSIDERATION OF COUNCIL' BILL No. 5026 REGARDING THE' PAVING OF PARK SIDE DRIVE. - THE DIRECTOR Ii
<br /> II II
<br /> OF PUBLIC WORKS EXPLAINED THAT IN ORDER TO PAVE A STRIP OF PARK SIDE DRIVE 25' WIDE IT WOULD BE \;
<br />II ' NECESSARY TO ASSES9 THREE ~ROPERTY OWNERS A ~OTAL Of APPROXIMATELY $2,000; AT LEAST ONE PROPERTY
<br /> OWNER IS OBJECTING TO THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. HE EXPLAINED THAT'THIS PAVING PROJECT HAD BEEN Ii
<br /> REQUESTED BY MRS. PAPE, ~N ORDER TO SERVE PROPERTY WHICH IS CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT. ;1
<br />I, I,
<br />'I THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT MRS. PAPEBE' REQUESTED TO ,CONTACT THE ,AFF-E-CT-ED ,PROPERTY OWNERS Ii
<br />:1 :!
<br /> AND SE~URE A PETITION FOR THE PROPOSED PAVING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. II
<br />II I:
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 6 OF THE COMMITTEE REP~RT i
<br />! BE APPROVED. .MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . . ; I
<br /> ,
<br />~J . .
<br /> 7~ RECONSIDERATION OF THE P~CHASE Of RIGHT-Of-WAY FOR THE EXTENSION OF WEST 38TH AVENUE - 'THE
<br />,
<br />I DIRECTOR Of" PUBLIC WORKS EXPLAINED THAT IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PURCHASE A SMALL PIECE OF PROPERTY
<br />I
<br />I IN ORDER TO SECURE THE NECESSARY RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE OPENING OF 38TH AVENUE WEST.
<br />i THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS ARRANGE'TO RAVE THE PROPERTY IN
<br />I QUESTION APPRAISED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />\ e
<br /> II
<br /> Ii
<br /> ':
<br />.......: \
<br /> Ii
<br />
|