|
<br />A 8~ i~:J "'IIIl
<br />::Ir J ''L~
<br />e
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />_._-~
<br />d -. ..'-.-.-'~:r ~~.,...'O~...-"...c.,...~. _.u==.C'=~..'~,'~. ....--...- .. . .-. .cu..,....... C~. I:
<br />
<br />
<br />\1 REPORTS OF OFF! CERS II
<br />
<br />I ':j A REPORT FROM THE CITY MANAGER - RE: MONTHLY OEPARTMENT.AL REPORTS, ETC., WAS SUBMITTEO ANO II
<br />:: READ AS fOLLOWS: ,:
<br />!I II
<br />.1 , .
<br />'I' "GENTLEMEN: II
<br />. q
<br />:1
<br />THE VALUE .Of BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED DURING JUNE, 1960 AMOUNTED TO $2,719,070, WHICH IS Ii
<br />$1,705,931 MORE THAN THE SAME MONTH A YEAR AGO. RESIDENTIAL PERMITS AMOUNTED TO 54 fOR $616,185.00; ill
<br />~~ .( COMMERC.lAL, 6 fOR $366,050 AND ONE PUBLIC BUILDING FOR $1,574,135. . !
<br />~~ ;, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ANSWERED 40 ALARMS, Of WHICH 5 WERE NON-fiRE AND 8 WERE RURAL. THE: 11
<br />(~ TOTAL ESTIMATED LOSS AMOUNTED TO $13,300. THE FIRE MARSHALL REPORTS 170 INSPECTIONS WITH 171 :\
<br />C:; HAZARDS fOUND AND 163 REMOVED. SATISFACTORY PROGRESS IS BEING MADE ON THE. CONSTRUCTION Of THE !,
<br />C~ NEW STATION. OCCUPANCY IS ANTICIPATED ON AUGUST I, 1960. :1
<br />,.
<br />ACCORDING TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT REPCRT, A COpy OF WHICH IS ON EACH OF YOUR DESKS, OUR CASE i:
<br />LOADS DROPPED SLI GHTL Y FROM A MONTH AGO ; J UVEN I LE ACT I V I TY D~OPPED 25% AND AT THE JA I L WE BOOKED I'll
<br />A TOTAL OF 204 PRISONERS, TWO MORE THAN fOR THE PRECEDING MONTH, BUT OUR AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION I
<br />WAS ONL Y 66 COMPARED TO 71 I N JUNE. OF THE BOOK- I NS, 103 WERE FOR THE COUNTY AN;[) 101 FOR THE )1
<br />e CITY. THE TOTAL INCLUDED II FEMALE PRISONERS. WE SERVED 6,196 MEALS AT AN AVERAGE COST Of 7.52~ !
<br />PER MEAL. I
<br />:: A COpy Of THE PARKS DEPARTMENT REPORT HAS BEEN PLACED ON EACH Of YOUR DESKS fOR YOUR LEISURE- i'i
<br />,\ L Y READ I NG. I
<br />':1 DEAN WALTER GORDON HAS REPORTED THAT THE A. I.A. HAS APPROVED OUR ARCHllE CTURAL COMPET I T ION; II
<br />" LETTER INVITING ARCHITECTS TO COMPETE WILL GO OUT TOMORROW. !I
<br />:1 I sl ROBERT A. F I NLA YSON 1:\
<br />I I CITY MANAGER ':
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT THE REPORT Of THE CITY MANAGER I;
<br />I I
<br />I BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON fiLE. I
<br />. i
<br />,
<br />i REPORTS OF COMMITTEES :
<br />'I
<br />:i A REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE MEETING WAS DA:rED JUNE 30, 1960. !I
<br />;1 "PRESENT: MAYOR COli:; COUNC I LMEN LAUR IS, MOLHOLM, MCGAffEY, CHATT, MOYER, WI LSON, SWANSON; :1
<br />'i CITY MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; TRAFfiC ENGINEER; DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS; II
<br />,I CITY ATTORNEY; PARK AND R CREATION SUPERINTENDENT; MRS. NIVEN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION; MR. . II
<br />:! FRED BRENNE OF THE EUGENEE'CHAMBER Of COMMERCE; MR. DON BONHAM AND MR. TOM JACQUES OF THE EUGENE :11
<br />., REGISTER-GUARD; AND OTHER INTERESTED CITIZENS. i
<br />, :1
<br />"
<br />2 I. DISCUSSION CONCERNIt-G THE CHANGE IN THE TAX BASE - MAYOR CONE INDICATED THAT THE BUDGET l!
<br />I ,I
<br />COMMITTEE HAD RECOMMENDED THAT SOME STUDY BE GIVEN TO THE CITY S TAX BASE BY A SPECIAL COMMITTEE Ii
<br />fOR fUTORE PRESENTATION TO THE VOTERS OF THE CITY. SOME DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON THIS AND IT WAS :i
<br />!: RECOMMENDED THATTHE MAYOR APPO I NT A TAX BASE STUDY COMM ITTEE WITH THE THOUGHT THAT A MEASURE fOR jl
<br />: THE INCREASE Of THE TAX. BASE MIGHT BE PRESENTED IN THE SPRING Of 1962. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ii
<br />I
<br />I II
<br />:\ IT WAS MOV5D BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM I Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT II
<br />'I BE APPROVED. . M TION CARRIED.V . . . Ii
<br />I Ii
<br />3 2. CONSIDERATON Of BUDGET COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION THAT A PERMANENT COMMITTEE BE APPOINTED ,;
<br />TO STUDY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON SALARY AND PERTINENT MATTERS -SOME DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON II
<br />I THIS MATTER, DURING WHICH DISCUSSION THE CITY ATTORNEY POINTED OUT THAT SUCH A COMMITTEE WOULD BE II
<br />AN UNOFFICIAL COMMITTEE TO MAKE STUDIES AN) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE WHOLE BUDGET COMMITTEE. SOME II
<br />OBSERVATIONS WERE HEARD WITH RESPECT TO THE MEMBERSHIP AND TO THE NUMBER or MEMBERS ~OR~SO~A AF I
<br />'i COMMITTEE.. IN THIS DISCUSSION IT WAS BROUGHT OUT THAT SUCH A COMMlrTEE SHOULD BE COMPOSED or Ii
<br />"I 'I
<br />::i ~AY ~MBERS Of THE BUDGET COMMITTEE ~S WELL AS SOME MEMBERS Of THE COUNCIL.. FOLLOWING THE DISCUS- ;:
<br />SION IT WAS REOOMMENDED THAT THE MAYOR APPOINT riVE MEMBERS TO A PERMA~NT CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO :1
<br />I MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON SALARIES AND OTHER PERTINENT MATTERS REGARDING THE CITY BUDGET. MOTION 1:
<br />Ii CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. :1
<br />e .1 - r ~ .\ II
<br />
<br />': IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SE~ON;ED^"~Y MRS. I..AURI~'THAT ITEM 2 OF THE CO~MI:nEE R~PORT I:
<br />" BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. ii
<br />
<br />, Ii
<br />4 ,1 3. RECONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST BY MRS. MERRYMAN F'OR EXCHANGE OF' PROPERTY FOR DRAINAGE DITCH II
<br />RIGHT-or-WAY ATMAHLON SWEET AIRPORT - THIS SUBJECT WAS AGAIN BROUGHT BEFORE THE COMMITTEE AT It
<br />WHICH TIME IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT, MRS. MERRYMAN WAS NOT WILLING TO GIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ENABLE I)
<br />THE CITY TO CLEAN A DRAINAGE DITCH TRAVERSIN THROUGH HER PROPERTY UNLESS THE CITY GRANTED HER A I
<br />DEED TO A THREE-ACRE TRAC;r OF CITY PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of MAHLON SWEET A I RPORT ii'
<br />ADJACENT r.o THE MERRYMAN PRO~RTY. . FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE I
<br />PROPER CITY OPFICIALS CONTINUE TO NEGOTIATE WITH MRS. MERRYMAN TO OBTAI N AN EASEMENT SOTTHE DRAINAGE II
<br />DITCH CAN BE CLEANED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. II
<br /><I
<br />Ii
<br />" IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 3 OF THE COMMITTEE REP~T !I
<br />BE APPROVED. i
<br />
<br />I I,
<br />5 4. REQUEST TO INSTALL CURB SIDEWALK AND RETAINING WALL ON CITY PROPERTY AT 2075 FRJ.ENDLY ::
<br />STREET. I TWAS EXP.I.CJ\JNED THAT MR. HAMMAR HAS REQUESTED THAT HE BE ALLOWED r.o CONSTRUCT A RETA I N- :1
<br />ING WALL IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-Or-WAY ADJACENT TO HIS PROPERTY AT 2075 FRIENDLY STREET. IT WAS II
<br />~i FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT IN PRIOR YEARS THE CITY HAS NOT ALLOWED PERMANE~T IMPROVEMENTS TO BE PLACED II
<br />,'Ii IN THE" PUBLIC RIGHT-Of-WAY. IT WAS fURTHER EXPLAINED THAT IN MR. HAMMAR'S CASE A RETAINING WALL II
<br />"I WOULD PROJECT 8 fEET INTO THE RIGHT-Of-WAY. IT WAS rURnER POINTED OUT THAT MR. HAMMAR DESIRED II
<br />,I TO CONSTRUCT A CURB SIDEWALK AT THIS LOCATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE RETAINING WALL AN) THE COMMIT- It
<br />TEE RECOMMENDED THAT MR. HAMMAR BE ALLOWED TO CONSTRUCT A CURB SIDEWALK. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. II
<br />
<br />· I
<br />
<br />:l~
<br />
|