|
<br /> I
<br /> 12
<br /> ,e
<br /> S/S/60
<br /> ,-. ., " , ,
<br /> ~
<br /> I " '
<br /> I SOUTH OF THE ALLEY, AND THE ALLEY EXTENDED WEST BETWEEN 7TH AND ~THAvENUES - TH I"S' MA TTER WAS AGA I N I
<br /> I
<br /> I BROUGHT BEFORE THE COMMITTEE AT THE REQUEST OF A PROPERTY OWNER AND AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCILMAN
<br /> I SWANSON. IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE ,COUNCIL HAD REZONED THIS PRO~ERTY TO M-2 BUT THERE WAi iOME QUESTIO~:
<br /> AS TO THE NECESS I TY FORAN M-2 ZONE 'TO EX I ST "N TH I S AREA, ESPEC I ALL Y AT THE NORTHWEST' CO RNER OF 'I
<br /> , ,'t
<br /> CHAMBERS AND STH AVENUE. MRS. MOE, A PROPERTY OWNER I N THE AREA, APPEARED BEFORE T,HE COUNC I L TO PRO- :1
<br /> " TEST THE ZON I NG TO M-2, AND', ND I CATED 'THAT SJCH ZON I NG WAS A DETRACT ION FROM THE NE I GHBORHOOD AND FROM 'I
<br /> THE RESIDENTIAL ZQNES I N THE AREA.. I
<br /> FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS IT WAS RECOMMENDED THIS ITEM BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING !
<br /> COMM I SS I ON FOR RESTUDY AND RECOMMENDAT I ON FOR THE ONE LOT ON THE NORTH"WEST CORNE'R OF STH AVENUE AND
<br /> CHAMBERS STREET TO BE REZONED BACK TO M-I. MOTION CARRIED, wlrn~ MR. MOYER AND MRS. LAUR I S VO} I NG 11
<br /> NO. . -. . . - - . - . . Ii
<br /> II
<br /> IT WAS MO~tD BY MRS. LAURIS AND SECONDED BY MR. MOLHO~~ THAT ITE M S OF THE COMM I TTEE REPORT .,
<br /> [I
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOT I ON CAR'R I.ED. it
<br /> , " :I
<br /> "
<br /> 9. REQUEST FOR A 36-MINUiE ~ARKI~ ZONE IN FRON!" O'F QUINN'S MARKET LOCATED AT I 123 MONROE H
<br />1 \1
<br /> STREET, ENTERED BY GEORGE SCOTT - THE COMMITTEE CONSIDERED THIS ITEM AND RECOMMENDED THAT TWO SPACES I,
<br /> ,I
<br /> BE ESTABLISHED IN FRON!" OF QUINN',S MARKET AT I 123 MONROE STREET" AND THAT SUCH SPACES BE RESTRICTED I: e
<br /> II
<br /> TO ONE-HOUR PARKING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. !!
<br /> ,.
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS AND SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 9 OF TH~ COMMITTEE REPORT Ii
<br /> . "
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOTtON .CARRIED;''-- . - ~ . - - - . - . . ' -, I!
<br /> -
<br /> . . . - - - -. ' . . . - - - . . - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - I:
<br /> - il
<br />2 10'. "COt:-JS'IDERATI()J OF PET'ITION RECEIVED PRO'TESTI'NG,Go""KART RACING ON WEST 11TH 'AVE'NUE,ANDOFF I'
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> BAILEY HILt RO'AD - AREA REPRESE~TATIVES APPEARED BEF6~E THE COMMITTEE TO PROTEST THE NOISE CREATED "
<br /> 'I I
<br /> BY THE GO-KART RACE TRACK LOCATED IMMED$ATELY SOUTH OF THE AMAZON AND J8ST WEST OF BAILEY HILL ROAD. I,
<br /> i:
<br /> REPRESENTATIVJ:lS OF THE BETHEL TABERNACLE ALSO APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMITTEE TO PROTEST THE NOISE I'
<br /> FACTOR, INDICATING IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE~ TO' HOLD RE~IGIO~S SERVICES: ~ LETTER FROM THE CITY II
<br /> ATTORNEY WAS LIKEWISE PRESENTED, CONCERNING THIS SITUATION, IN WHICH THE CITY ATTORNEY REVIEWED THE I:
<br /> ZONING FOR THIS AREA AND IN WHICH,HE INDICATED THE USE MIGHT BE STOPPED BY REASO~ O~,LAND USE WHICH ,
<br /> i:
<br /> "
<br /> EM I TS 'OBJECT IONABLE ,NO ISES 'BYTHE' 'GO-KART 'TRACK, 'BUT_ THA'T 'AN.'!'SUCH ACT I ON WOULD 'BE 'BASED 'ON" TH.E ZON i NG I
<br /> :t
<br /> ORDINANCE AND IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO' BRING SUIT AGAI'NST THE' OWNERS 'AND 'OPERATORS OF'THE"GO-'KART' ," ii
<br /> TRACK' FOR A DETE'RM I NAT ION TO BE' MADE AS TO WHETHER THE T'RACK WAS I N V I OLAT ION OF THE ZON I NG ORD I NACE
<br /> I!
<br /> IN REGARD TO IT BEING AN OBJECTIONABLE NOISE. i!
<br /> PETITIONS WERE ALSO PRESENTED CONTAI NING 6S NAMES OBJECTING TO THE OPERATION OF THE TRACK Ii
<br /> i'
<br /> NEAR CHURCH' PROPERTY, WHICH HINDERS REL'IGIOUS SERVICES AND W'H'ICH ALSO IN6IC~TE THAT RESIDENTS OF. 11
<br /> ' . FOLLOW-
<br /> THE AREA FIND THE NOISE CREATED TO BE UNBEARABLE AND VERY DISTURBING TO THEIR PEACE OF MIND. -i
<br /> ING SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT IT BE HELD IN COMMITTEE , FOR FURTHER STUDY. II
<br /> MOT ION 'CARR lED. - , - . - - - - -- . . - -- - - - - . )1
<br /> . - . - . - - ' " - - . - - - 'I
<br /> A NUMBE;R OF C I T I ZEt-IS" FRO M THE GENERA'L AREA OF THE GO-KART. RACE TRACK APPEARED BE FORE' THE '.: "
<br /> II
<br /> COUNCIL TO PROTEST THE HIGH NOISE ~ACTO~ OCCASIoNED BY THE OPERATION OF THE GO-KA~T RACE TRACK. ;1
<br /> "
<br /> R~~RESENTATIVES WHO A~PEARED BEFORE THE C00NCIL INCLUDED MR. MA~K COSTELLO, 1930 TODD STREET; MR. I'
<br /> 'I
<br /> OTTO VONDERHEIT, AN ATTORNEY FOR A PORTION OF THE GOURP; MR:VSTANLEY" OF 1625 BAILEY HILL ROAD; I,
<br /> I:
<br /> It
<br /> MRS. TODD, 1524 BUCK STREET; MRS. CLAR~, WHO LIVES ON I IT~ A EN~E IN THE NEAR VICINITY OF THE RAtE Ii
<br /> TRACK; MR. KINNEY~ 1596 BA.I LEY HilL ROAD; MRS. R'IDENOUER, Ass I STANT, PASTO,R OF HE BETHEL TABERNACLE;
<br /> JULI A MART IN, WHO LIVES .IN' THE VICINITY' OF HAWKIN'S HILL.
<br /> THESE.PEOPlE I ND'I,CATED' THEY BEL I EVE THERE HAS BEENSER'I OUS DAMAGE DOI'lE TO THE I R. PROPERTY"
<br /> BECAUSE OF THE UNREASONABLE NOISE CREATED BY THE RACE TRACK~ AND F'URTHER, THAT I T WAS THE COUNCIL'S
<br /> DUTY TO PROTECT AREA RESIDENTS WITHIN. AND WITHOUT THE CITY. IT,W~S Also 6RO~GHI~OWT,T~ATTHE NOISE I
<br /> FACTOR WO~LD BE S~FFICIENT GRO~NDS~ UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE, FOR. THE TRACK TO BE' ABATED; THAT THE ':
<br /> PEOPLE IN THE GENERAL AREA CANNOT HEAR, CHILDREN CANNOT SLEEP, DAY' SLEEPERS CANNOT SLEEP, AND GENERAL I:
<br /> ;i
<br /> RROPERTY VALUE$ HAD BEEN DETRACTED FROM BY THE OPERATION OF THE TRACK. COMMENTS WERE. ALSO MADE REGARD- 'I
<br /> JNGi'THE SANITARY FAClllr'ltS, THE )NCIDENCE OF TR~FFIC ON' BAILEY HILL ROA~ A~D PARKING ON THE ~HOULDERS Ii
<br /> OF THE BAILEY HILL ROAD, AND THE FACT THAT CHURCHES IN THE AREA CANNOT CONDUCT RELIGIOUS SERVICES. :i
<br /> II
<br /> THESE COMPLA.INTS WERE VOICED HEAVILY BY PEOPLE ,
<br /> IMMED!MTB-Y ADJACENT TO THE TRACK AND WERE ALSO VO I CEO I:
<br /> BY PEOPLE ~HO L!VE AT SOME DISTANtE FROM THE TRACK, BUT IN THE GENERAL"AREA. ,.
<br /> n
<br /> MR."PAUL PRICE STATED HE HAD.CONTROLLED THE.OPERATION OF THE TRACK ON SUNDAYS, THAT HE ,HAD , ii e
<br /> NOT STARTED OPERAT ION, UNT I L NOON, AND HAD' TERMINATED THE OPERATION AT 6 PM. HE DID INDICATE THERE I
<br /> WAS A GOOD POSSIBILITY OF TRESSPASSERS USING THE TRACK AT aWHER,.THAN AUTHORIZED TIMES. I
<br /> !I
<br /> II
<br /> IT WAS THEN MOVED BY MRS. LAUR I S AND SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM. THAT THE RECOMMENDAT'ION OF.' THE II
<br /> COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE' BE ADOPTED, IN COMMITTEE . . . . MOTION II
<br /> THAT THIS ITEM BE HELD FOR FURTHER STUDY.
<br /> CARRIED. I
<br /> I'
<br /> II
<br /> I I. REQUEST Tb VACATE THE ALLEY RUNNING FROM"BR~DWAY:TO SOUTH PARK'STREET BETW~EN WI~LAMETTE "
<br />3 H
<br /> I'
<br /> AN) OAK STREET, APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSWON, AND THE CONSIDERATION OF A 100% PETITION'FOR II
<br /> IN THE EDGEWOOD ESTATES A~DITION, R~QUE~TED,BY BREEDEN.BROTHERS, WERE I'
<br /> THE ANNEXATION OF ~ROPERTY ,I
<br /> I'
<br /> RECOMMENDED' 'TO ri'IE,'COUNC:'L- WI T~OUT' __RE~OMME'NDAT:I CN '.', MOT ION ,CAR~.IED,., . , , ' - ' " - - - . " , !I
<br /> - - - - . . .. -------------- ---..
<br /> , ' ;,
<br /> I: I T' WAS MOVED, BY. MRS. LAURIS AND SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM II OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT I
<br /> "
<br /> MOTION CARRIED. ", , Ii
<br /> ,I BE APPROVED. 'I
<br /> .'. . . i:
<br /> REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS "
<br /> A REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 2, 1960 - RE: VACATION OF UTILITY' ii I
<br />4 I'
<br /> "
<br /> LOT 8, BLOCK 4, 1ST AD~IT10N CAL YOUNG 80MESTEAD, WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: "
<br /> EASEMENT, "
<br /> "A.UGUSJ 2, 1960 I
<br /> II
<br /> TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR,AND I
<br /> COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE II
<br /> "
<br /> :i
<br /> II LOT .S, BLOCK "1, I'
<br /> SUBJECT: VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT, ;(
<br /> I,; !I
<br /> 'i .. . .. - FIRST ADDITION TO'CAl.: 'YOUNG ,HOMESTEAD' - - - . e
<br /> I: 11
<br />~
<br />
|