<br /> "... 9 0
<br /> NOVEMBER 28, 1960 e
<br /> COUNCIL CHAMBER
<br /> 11/28/60 EUGENE, OREGON
<br /> I , II
<br /> I
<br /> THE REGULAR MEETING or THE COMMON COUNCIL or THE CITY or EUGENE WAS HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1960
<br /> AND ADJOURNED TO NOVEMBER 28, 1960 AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO I, I
<br /> ORDER BY HIS HONOR MAYOR E. E. CONE WITH THE fOLLOWING COUNCILMEN PRESENT: I'
<br /> , MR. SHEARER, MRS. LAURIS, "
<br /> ,
<br /> MR. MOLHOLM, MR. MCGA~FEY, MR. CHATT, MR. MOYER, MR. WILSON AND MR. SWANSON.
<br /> '. II
<br /> Ii
<br /> THE INVOCATION WAS GIVEN BY REV. DAVID WHITE. I'
<br /> THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD NOVEMBER ,I
<br /> 17, 1960 WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR APPROVAL AS :i
<br /> OF THIS DATE AND WERE HELD OVER UNTIL THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. :1
<br /> Ii
<br /> INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS I,
<br /> I'
<br /> Ii "
<br /> 'i
<br /> I i: COUNCILMAN SHEARER STATED AT, THE RECENT LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES MEETING HELD IN SALEM, A NUMBER
<br /> If d
<br /> II OF PAPERS WERE PRESENTED AND A NUMBER or INDIVIDUALS SPOKE ON THE SUBJECT OF ANNEXATION. HE SUG-
<br /> I
<br /> GESTED THAT COPIES or THESE PAPERS BE OBTAINED FROM THE LEAGUE OF OREroN CITIES orFICIALS ANO THAT
<br /> SUCH COPIES BE rORWARDED TO THE LANE COUNTY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION, IN HOPES THAT SOME ACTION ON THE
<br /> ANNECATION QUEST~S MIGHT BE TAKEN BY THE LEGISLATURE, WHI~ CONVENES IN JANUARY, 1961.
<br /> COUNCILMAN SHEARER SUGGESTED THAT EXISTING STATE LAWS ARE SOMEWHAT ARCHAIC. HE ALSO PROPOSED p
<br /> THAT A MEETING BE HELD WITH THE LEGISLATIVE DELtGATION ON THIS AND OTHER SUBJECTS, A~~HAT THE " e
<br /> I:
<br /> SPRINGrlELD CITY COUNCIL BE INVITED TO THIS MEETING. IT WAS rURTHER SUGGESTED THAT THE MEETING NOT "
<br /> "
<br /> I,
<br /> BE CONFINED TO PROBLEMS OF ANNEXATION, BUT THAT IT COVER A NUMBER OF THE PROBLEMS CU~~ENTLY BEING
<br /> rACED BY THE CITIES, SUCH AS ANNEXAT~, FINANCING AND OTHER AREAS THAT MIGHT BE REMEDIED BY STATE-
<br /> WIDE LEGISLATION.
<br /> THE MAYOR,SUGGESTED THAT SUCH A MEETING BE SET UP.
<br /> No rORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL.
<br /> 2 THE CITY MANAGER REPORTED HE,HAD HELD DISCUSSIONS WITH REPRESENTATIVES or SCHOOL DISTRICT #4 I
<br /> ON THE POSSIBIL'ITY Of ACQUIRING SOME PORTION or THE SO-CALLEO FRANCIS WILLARD PROPERTY LOCATED
<br /> IMMEDIATELY SOUTH or THE LIBRARY BUILDING. HE STATED THE WHOLE OF THE PROPERTY HAD BEEN PRICED AT
<br /> $125,000 AND SUGGESTED THAT A 60 FOOT PARCEL IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE LIBRARY AND RUNNING FROM
<br /> OLIVE TO CHARNELTON STREET MIGHT BE OPTIONED AT A PRICE OF $35,000 TOTAL PRICE, WITH THE OPTION TO
<br /> BE EFFECTIVE UNTIL NOVEMBER OF 1962. THE COUNC I L HELD SOME 0 I SCUSS 10 N ON TH I S PRO POSAL.
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THIS ITEM BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE
<br /> OF THE WHOLE. MOTION CARRIED. I,
<br /> ,.
<br /> "
<br /> I'
<br /> "
<br /> 3 SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD AMONG VARIOUS OF THE COUNCH MEMBERS WITH REGARD TO THE CONTINUATION II
<br /> OF nE CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING FOR AMAZON CREEK. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATION HAD HAD !!
<br /> VARIOUS DISCUSSIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS ON THIS SUBJECT BUT THAT NOTHING HAD THUS FAR BEEN ACCOMPLISHED
<br /> IN CONGRESS TOWARD THE EXTENSION OF THE CHANNEL LINING.
<br /> FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED By'MR. MCGAFFEY THAT THE ADMINI- "
<br /> STRATIVE STAFF BE INSTRUCTED TO PURSUE THE SUBJECT or ADDITIONAL CHANNEL LINING ON AMA~N CREEK AT 'I
<br /> BOTH ENDS OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL LINING, AND THAT THE CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION BE CONTACTED TO THIS il
<br /> END. MOTl ON CARR I ED.
<br /> 4 THE CITY MANAGER REPORTED ON A VARIANCE WHICH HAD BEEN GRANTED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 18TH AVENUE
<br /> AT PIERCE STREET FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A LAUNDROMAT. HE STATED THAT THE HOLDER OF THE VARIANCE
<br /> ;i HAD COMPLIED WITH THE TERMS OF THE VARIANCE WITH REGARD TO A SETBACK FOR A FIVE FOOT PLANTING STRIP
<br /> I;
<br /> II ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. IT WAS FURTHER INDICATED THAT THERE MAY BE SOME QUESTION AS
<br /> "
<br /> TO THE SETBACK' FROM THE STREET, THAT THIS MATTER WOULD BE VERifiED AND REPORTED ON. No FORMAL ACTION
<br /> WAS TAKEN ON THIS SUBJECT. I
<br /> 'I
<br /> REPORTS OF COMMITTEES I'
<br /> .!
<br /> "
<br /> Ii
<br /> I: A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 23, 1960 i!
<br /> ii I
<br /> PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS,MoLHOLM, MOYER, WILSON, SWANSON; COUNCILMEN
<br /> ,/ELECT CHR I STENSEN ArID DEVERELL; C I T Y MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; DIRECTOR OF PUBLICWORKS; CH EF OF POL ICE;
<br /> TRAFFIC ENGINEER; PLANNING CONSULTANT; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; CITY ATTORNEY; LT. SMARTT; MESSRS. e
<br /> JONES AND LINDSTROM FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON; MRS. NIVEN; MRS. BUTLER; DAN WYANT OF THE EUGENE
<br /> REGISTER-GUARD AND WENDY RAY OF RADIO STATION KUGN.
<br /> ,:
<br /> I'
<br /> 5 !! I . REQUEST FOR CURB CUT EXTENSION ON CHARNELTON STREET AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 220 WEST 7TH -
<br /> REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COMMITTEE OBSERVED THE REQUESTED CURB CUT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF i'
<br /> I
<br /> I "
<br /> " CHARNELTON STREET, JUST SOUTH OF 7TH AVENUE, WHICH THE PROPERTY OWNER REQUESTED FOR APPROVAL. HE ,I
<br /> II
<br /> ASKED THAT AN EXISTING CURB CUT BE EXTENDED FROM 37 FEET TO 45 FEET. THE REQUEST STATED IF SUCH I:
<br /> I CURB CUT WERE ALLOWED IT WOULD BE EASIER FOR CUSTOMERS TO ENTER THE STATION FROM CH~RNELTON STREET
<br /> THAN IT IS AT THE PRESENT TIME. THE COMM I TTEE CONS I DERED THE MATTER AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXTENS I eN ii:
<br /> BE GRANTED, WITH THE EXTENSION TO BE TO THE NORTH Of THE EXISTING CUT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL~. ~ :
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR'S THAT ITEM I OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE I'
<br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. ,
<br /> I' :i
<br /> "
<br /> I: :
<br /> 6 2. REQUEST FOR CURB SIDEWALKS -
<br /> I
<br /> A. FRIENDLY STREET BETWEEN 24TH AVENUE AND 25TH AVENUE. A REQUEST FROM A PROPERTY OWNER LOCATED I
<br /> AT 2467 FRIENDLY STREET FOR A CURB SIDEWALK WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE WITH A RECOMMENDATION II
<br /> i OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT SUCH CURB SIDEWALKS BE ALLOWED. THE PUBLIC WORKS DEP~TMENT ALSO
<br /> H RECOMMENDED THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE ALLOWED ON BOTH SIDES OF FRIENDLY STREET BETWEEN 24TH AVENUE AND
<br /> ,: I
<br /> 28TH AVENUE. THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE REQUESTED CURB SIDEWALK AT 2467 FRIENDLY STREET, AS WELL AS ,I
<br /> ;i'
<br /> THE WHOLE OF FRIENDLY STREET BETWEEN 24TH AND 28TH AVENUES AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE CURB SIDEWALK BE "
<br /> 'I
<br /> ALLOWED AT 2467 FRIENDLY STREET AND THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE APPROVED ALONG BOTH SIDES OF FRW,ENDLY il
<br /> STREET BETWEEN 24TH AND 28TH AVENUES. MOT'ON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I: e
<br /> :,
<br /> ~
<br />
|