|
<br /> ~ 0
<br /> "1
<br /> '1 .
<br /> e
<br /> 12/27/60
<br /> . _. . -
<br /> li\
<br /> II I
<br /> SHUT THE DOOR ON THE MISSION AND THAT HE BELIEVED THE C,TY SHOULD HELP TO fiND A LOCATION fOR THE MIS-
<br /> SION, THAT THE PROPOSED NEW LOCATION AT 5TH AND W,LLAMETTE WOULD BE UNDULY DETRIMENTAL TO PROPERTY
<br /> I VAL.UES.
<br /> " MR. McGAFfEY QUESTIONED AS TO WHETHER THE ZONING COULD BE C-3 OR LESS. THE CITY ATTORNEY STATED
<br /> )!
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> THIS WAS HIS INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE.
<br /> I:
<br /> : MR. MOLHOLM QUESTIONED THE HOURS Of OPERATION Of THE MISSION WHICH HAD BEEN.6:00 PM TO 6:00 AM.
<br /> " A MISSION REPRESENTATIVE SAID THESE COULD BE ADJUSTED TO MEET PROBLEMS WHICH MI~HT OCCUR.
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> I'
<br /> MR. CHATT RELATED THE PROBLEM AT HAND TO THE fACT THAT 'NO PLAGE HAD BEEN fOUND EQUAL. OR BETTER I,
<br /> THAN THE EXISTING LOCATION. II
<br /> MR. SWANSON RELATED HIS EXPERIENCE IN BUSINESS ON 6TH AVENUE AND 7TH AVENUE AND W,LLAMETTE STREET, ,
<br /> WHICH fiNALLY CULMINATED IN THE MOVING Of HIS BUSINESS fR'OM THIS AREA. il
<br /> "
<br /> VARIOUS OTHER QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WERE GIVEN WHICH WERE,BASICALLY REITERATIONS Of COMMENTS PRE- I e
<br /> ,
<br /> 11 VIOUSLY MADE. (I
<br /> I
<br /> ,. IT WAS THEN MOVED BY,MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT THE fINDINGS Of THE PLANNING COM-
<br /> " MISSION BE UPHELD AND THAT THE COUNCIL fiNDS THE LOCATION Of THE EUGENE MISSION AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
<br /> I:
<br /> !:
<br /> OF 5TH AND.WILLAMETTESTREET WOULD 'BE -UNDULY DETRIMENTAL TO-PROPERTY VALUES IN THE AREA. MOTION CAR-
<br /> RI'ED, WITH MR. SHEARER, MR. MOLHOLM,.MR. .,MOYER AND MR. SWANSON VOTING AYE, AND MRS.,LAURIS, MR. MCGAFFEY
<br /> AND MR. CHATT VOTING NAY. I
<br /> MR. GODDARD THEN INQUIRED WHETHER THE MISSION SHOULD CONTINUE. LOOKING fOR A SITE. MRS. LAURIS
<br /> SUGGESTED THAT THEY APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION fOR HELP, AND A NUMBER Of PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE
<br /> VOLUNTEERED HELP. Ii
<br /> CHATT .SECONDED BY MR. MCGAffEY THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONDUCT A STUDY I;
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. ,
<br /> ;1
<br /> TOWARDS FINDING A SUITABLE SITE fOR A TRANSIENT HOUSE. MOTION CARRIED. 'I
<br /> I,
<br /> i, I:
<br /> I'
<br /> I " MAYOR CONE COMMENTED THAT COUNCILMEN SHEARER AND MCGAFfEY WERE WINDING UP THE1RTERMS ON THE Ii
<br /> '. COUNCIL AND COMMENDED EACH Of THEM 'FOR THE FINE WORK THEY HAVE DONE IN THE PAST YEARS.
<br /> I:
<br /> 2 COUNCILMAN SHEARER REMARKED THAT THE RECENT DEATH OF THE:POLICE CHtEf IN JUNCTION CITY AGAIN
<br /> ,
<br /> BROUGHT TO MIND THE fACT THAT POLICE PERSONNEL SHOULD NOT ATTEMPT TO DISARM INDIVIDUALS BY PEACEfUL ,
<br /> MEANS, AND THAT REPRESENTATIVES Of THE EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT SHOULD BE INSTRUCTED NOr TO HANDLE A I
<br /> SITUATION Of THIS TYPE WITH KID. GLOVES. ,
<br /> :!
<br /> -
<br /> I COUNCILMAN SWANSON COMMENTED REGARDING THE CONDITION Of SCAffOLDING AND PROTECTIVE COVERING AROUND
<br /> 3 I,
<br /> I THE HOffMAN HOTEL WHICH IS BEING DEMOLISHED. HE INDICATED NAILS PROTRUDING, THAT THE AREA IS DIRTY,
<br /> I
<br /> UNLIGHTED, AND THAT A NUMBER Of CITIZENS HAn COMPLAINED ABOUT THESE,CONDITIONS. THE CiTY MANAGER RE-
<br /> PORTED THAT THE BUILDING OWNERS AND WRECKERS HAD. BEEN CONTACTED REGARDING THIS MATTER AND THAT SOME
<br /> WORK HAD BEEN DONE BY'THEM, BUT THAT IT APPEARS THERE WERE SOME PROBLEMS AND THAT NOT ALL_ RECOMMENDA- I
<br /> I. TIONS Of THE CITY HAD BEEN CARRIED OUT.
<br /> " h
<br /> 4' MONTHLY PAYMENT ESTIMATES WERE SUBMITTED AS APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> WI LD'I SH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
<br /> 5TH - AIRPORT.CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ' 11,,945.58
<br /> BYRNES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY -
<br /> 4TH - DISTRICT JMPROVEMENT #875: 2,249.92
<br /> 'T WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT THE ESTIMATES AS SUBMITTED BE APPROVED H
<br /> " AND THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO DRAW THE NECESSARY WARRANTS. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL I:
<br /> I ~
<br /> COUN~ILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> "
<br /> , "
<br /> " ,
<br /> , ,I
<br /> I: REPORTS OF OFFICERS
<br /> !I
<br /> ,I
<br /> A REPORT FROM THE CITY RECORDER RE INITIATIVE PET.ITION. WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS fOllOWS: "
<br /> "
<br /> 51, liTHE LANE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION HAS fiLED AN INITIATIVE PETITION WI~H THE BA~LOT TITLE it
<br /> d
<br /> 'REQUIRING VOTE LIMITED ROUTE, STREETS, F,NANC,NG' WITH THE PURPOSE 'REQUIRING VOTER ~PPROVAL
<br /> Of ROUTES, PLANS AND SEPARATE APPROVAL Of fiNANCING BEfORE RIGHT-Of-WAY ACQUISITION OR CON- I
<br /> I:
<br /> STRUCTION, L1MITED OR CONTROLlEb, ACCESS STREETS AND CI~Y'. !i I
<br /> , !I
<br /> I! THIS PETITION HAS BEEN CIRCULATED AND MORE THAN THE REQUIRED 3,333 SIGNATURES HAVE BEEN
<br /> Ii
<br /> OBTAINED AND HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY THE LAN~ COUNTY ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT. Ii
<br /> '!
<br /> OREGON REVISED STATUTES REQUIRE THAT I TRANSMIT THIS PETITION TO THE NEXT SESSION Of I'
<br /> THE CITY COUNCIL. THE STATUTES FURTHER STATE AS fOLLOWS: ,I
<br /> ,
<br /> ,
<br /> 'THE COUNCIL SHALL EITHER ORDAIN OR RE~ECT IT, AS PROPOSED, WITHIN 30 DAYS. "
<br /> r If THE COUNCIL REJECTS i -
<br /> IT OR TAKES NO ACTION ON IT, THE . . . . . RECORDER . . . . . ,
<br /> ~
<br />
|