Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~., <br />13~ <br /> <br />1/9/61 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />11 COUNCIL BILL No. 5173 - LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR INSTALLATION OF SIDEWA.LKS ON .26TH AVENUE FROM <br />I LAWRENCE TO WASHINGTON STREET WAS SUBMITTED AND READ THE FIRST TIME IN FULL. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED.BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THE SILL BE HELD OVER AND PROPER NOTICE <br />OF ASSESSMENT GI~EN OWNERS OF AFFECTED PROPERTY. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />2 <br />I' <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN WILSON REMARKED HE,HAD SOME QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CITY~S SEWER PROGRAM. HE STATED <br />IT HAD BEEN INDICATED TO HIM THAT BUILDING INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS HAD BEEN HELD BACK DUE TO A LACK OF <br />, . <br />SEWERS. HE SUGGESTED THE CITY MIGHT PROPOSE A BOND ISSUE TO ACQUIRE FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NECES- <br />SARY SEWER LINES AND PLEDGE A PORTION OF THE PROCEEDS qF THE WATER;USER CHA~GE TO PAY SUCH BONDS. HE <br />FURTHER STATED HE DID NOT BELIEVE A CRASH PROGRAM~AT THIS TIME WOULD COST MORE THAN BUILD~NG THESE <br />SEWERS OVER A NUMBER OF YEARS~ SINCE IT APPEARS THAT COSTS WILL CONTINUE TO RISE. MAYOR CONE REMARKED <br />IT HAD BEEN HIS THOUGHT THE WATER USER CHARGE WOULD BE US~D TO RENOVATE ~XISTING LINES IN THE CITY AND <br />THAT A BOND ISSUE WOULD BE USED FOR FINANCING THE WILLAKE;NZIE AREA. ,COUNCIL~AN WILSON STA"fED HE WAS <br />NOT REFERRING TO THE WILLAKENZIE AREA BUT WAS REFERRING TO CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE OLDER PART OF THE <br />CITY~ <br /> <br />3, <br /> <br />AT THIS POINT THE COUNCIL GAVE SOME ATTENTION TO SOME PROPOSED BALLOT MEASURES ON WHICH AN ELECTION <br />WOULD.BE NECESSARY AT SO~E TIME IN:THE FUTURE. THESE PRO~OSE~ MEASURES iNCLUDED INITIATIVE PETITIONS <br />REGARD I NG STREET ROUT' NG AND F I NANC I NG~ WH I CH MUST GO ON .ANY BALLOT AFTER MARCH 27 ~ I 96Ql!1 I T FURTHER <br />INCLUDES A BOND ISSUE FOR CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION, POSSIBLE SERIAL LEVY FOR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT <br />CONSTRUCTION~ A POSSIBLE BOND' ISSUE FOR'THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD, ~ POSSIBLE ~ERIAL LEVY FOR <br />SALARIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES, AND, DEPENDENT ~PON THE OYTCOME OF CERTAIN LITIGATIONS, THE POSSIBILITY <br />OF A NEW LEVY FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION. <br /> <br />SOME CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS GIVEN AS TO WHETHER THESE ITEMS SHOULD ALL BE CONTAINED ON ONE BALLOT <br />OR WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE TWO GROUPS OF MEASURES AT DIFFERENT ELECTIONS. ONE THOUGHT EXPRESSED WOULD <br />PROVIDE FOR AN ELECTION 'ON,PA~KS~ SALARIES~ EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD AND.THE INITIATIVE PETITION <br />FOR STREET FINANCING~ TO BE HELD IN T~E SPRING OF 1961 .WITH THE CITY HALL MEASURE TO.BE HEL~ IN THE <br />FALL. VARIOUS OTHER PROPOSALS WERE ADVANCED AND IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT THE ADMINISTRATION SHOULD <br />MAKE A RECOMMENpATION AS TO WHAT M~ASURES MIGHT APPEARON:THE BALLOT, WI!H_A SUGG~STED DATE OR DATES. <br /> <br />UPON MOTION DULY MADE~ SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE MEKT/NG WAS ADJOURNED. <br /> <br />. ' <br /> <br /> <br />~;;;~EO <br /> <br /> <br />. . <br />HUGH MCKINLEY <br />CITY MANAGER <br />. . <br /> <br /> <br />J <br />C-D <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />\ <br />I, <br />.\ <br />': <br />i; <br />.. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ ; <br />I <br />11 <br />\\ <br />'I <br />I! <br />" <br />I' <br />:i <br />Ii <br />'I <br />I, <br />" <br />.' <br />Ii <br />II <br />!i <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />I, <br />, <br />Ii <br />i <br />I: <br />'I <br />,. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />,I! <br /> <br />e <br />