Laserfiche WebLink
<br />""lIIIII <br />183 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3/13/61 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TERMINATION OF EMPLOYEES' SALARIES AND WORKING CONDITIONS AND PUTS, THE AUTHORITY IN THE <br />HANDS OF AN OUTSIDE STATE AGENCY AND THUS DILUTES THE ABILITY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY <br />TO GOVERN THEMSELVES. THE BILL WOULD BE LESS OBJECTIONABLE WERE BOTH OF THESE SECTIONS <br />MADE PERMISSIVE RATHER THAN COMPULSIVE. <br /> <br />~ <br />Ii <br />I' <br />: <br /> <br />THIS BILL IS TO BE DISCUSSED BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT AT 8:00 AM <br />THURSDAY, MARCH 16. <br /> <br />THE OTHER (2) IS SB 406 AND WOULD LIMIT THE POWER OF THE CITY TO ISSUE BONDS TO THE <br />EXTENT THAT IN THE BOND ELECTION THE ELECTION WOULD BE INVALID UNLESS MORE THAN 25% OF <br />THE LEGAL VOTERS VOTED UPON THE QUESTION~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />SB 406 IS DESIGNED TO MAKE MUNICIPAL ISSUANCE OF BONDS MORE DIFFICULT AND COULD <br />RESULT IN THE LOSS OF BOND ELECTION EVEN THOUGH THE MAJOR~TY OF THOSE VOTING FAVORED <br />THE PROPOSAL. THERE ARE MANY INSTANCES IN THE PAST WHEN SPECIAL ELECTIONS TO AUTHORIZE <br />THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS HAVE BEEN FULLY EXPLAINED AND WELL ADVERTISED AND YET THE VOTERS <br />HAVE NOT SHOWN ENOUGH INTEREST FOR 25% OF THEM TO GO TO THE POLBS. THIS IN EFFECT WOULD <br />HAVE THE RESULT OF MAKING THE FAILURE TO VOTE A 'NO' VOTE. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MEASURE WILL BE AT '100 PM, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 15. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />SHOULD THE COUNCIL WISH TO TAKE ACTION ON EITHER OF THESE MATTERS AND BE REPRE- <br />SENTED IN SALEM AT THE COMMITTEE MEETINGS, THE REPRESENTATION BY ELECTED OffiCIALS <br />WOULD PROBABLY BE MORE EFfECTIVE THAN BY APPOINTED OffiCIALS OR CITY EMPLOYEES." <br /> <br />~ <br />0=: <br />C\J <br />~ <br />~ <br />c:.c <br /> <br />THE COUNCIL DISCUSSED HB 1466 AND MAYOR CONE STATED HE OBJECTED TO THE BILL ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE <br />COUNCIL WOULD BE SUBJECTED TO PRESSURES WITK REGARD TO EMPLOYEES' SALARIES AND WITHO~T REGAR~ TO <br />LOCAL CONSIDERATION. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LAURIS INDICATED SHE DOES NOT DESIRE TO TAKE A STAND ON THIS <br />MATTER AND GENERALLY WAS OF THE OPINION THAT GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES SHOULD HAVE SOME RIGHT Of REDRESS <br />WHERE THEY BELIEVED IT TO BE NECESSARY. <br /> <br />SOME CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THE QUESTION AS TO WHETHER THE BILL SHOULD BE MANDATORY OR <br />PERMISSIVE. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM .THAT THE COUNCIL SUPPORT HB 1466 PROVIDING IT IS <br />AMENDED SO AS TO MAKE IT PERMISSIVE RATHER THAN MANDATORY. MOTION DEFEATED WITH MRS. LAURIS, MESSRS. <br />MOLHOLM AND CHATT VOTING AYE; MESSRS. SWANSON, CHRISTENSEN, DEVERELL AND MAYOR CONE VOTING NAY. <br /> <br />IT WAS NOVEDBY MR. SWANSON SECONDED BY MR. CHRISTENSEN THAT THE MAYOR BE ASKED TO APPEAR BEFORE THE <br />LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE IN OPPOSITION TO HB1466. MOTION CARRIED WITH MAYOR CONE CASTING THE DECIDING <br />AYE VOTE. <br /> <br />IN REGARD 10 S8 406 IT WAS NOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THE COUNCIL OPPOSE THE <br />PASSAGE OFITHIS BILL. MOTION, CARRIED. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />THE CITY MA AGER ALSO INTRODUCED THE SUBJECT Of SB 449 WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT CITIES FROM CHARGING OUT- <br />SIDE WATER SERS A HIGHER RATE THAN CITY .RESIDENTS. IT. WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOL- <br />HOLM THAT T E COUNCIL GO ON RECORD IN OPPOSITION TO THIS BILL. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />" <br />THE CITY MA AGER ALSO INTRODUCED THE SUBJECT OF SB 488 WHICH WOULD AUTHORIZE COUNTIES TO PROVIDE WATER <br />SUPPLIES A~ 'WATER DRAINAGE SERVlcES IN UNINCORPORATED URBAN AREAS. <br /> <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />IT WAS STAT D THAT THE CITY OF SALEM IS DESIROUS OF SEEING THIS BILL PASSED BECAUSE OF A PROBLEM IN THE <br />SALEM AREA; IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF POSSIBLE ADVERSE CONSIDERATIONS TO THE PAS- <br />SAGE Of THI BILL IN THAT IT WOULD MAKE ANNEXATION LESS ATTRACTIVE, WOULD MAKE fOR A POSSIBILITY Of A <br />LARGE DISTRICT TO SURROUND THE CITY WITH WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE SERVICES THUS THROTTLING THE CITY <br />AS A TYPE 0 ' ANOTHER SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT. <br /> <br />IT <br /> <br /> <br />BY MR. CHATT SECONDED ,BY MR. CHRISTENSEN THAT THE COUNCIL OPPOSE SB 488. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />COUNCIL SWA SON INDICATED HE ~AD PROPOSED MA~l~GGA MOTION REGARDING THE LOCATION OF THE EUGENE MISSION <br />AT THIS MEE 'NG BUT AT THE REQUEST OF AN ATTORNEY REPRESENTING CERTAIN INTERESTS IN THE WEST 2ND AVE- <br />NUE AREA AN AT THE REQUEST Of SOME.OF THE COUNCIL, HE WOULD WITHHOLD MAKING SUCH A MOTION AT THIS TIME. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. FRANK A BRIGHT, WHO LIVES ON THE SOUTH SIDE Of WEST 2ND AVENUE APPROXIMATELY ONE AND ONE~HAlF <br />BLOCKS fROM THE LUTHERAN CHURCH WHICH ,IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED AS THE LOCATION FOR THE EUGENE MISSION, <br />APPEARED BEFORE THE COUNCIL AND REQUESTED TO BE HEARD, STATING THAT HE HAS fOUR HOUSES IN THE AREA <br />WHICH HE RE TS. AT ~RESENT, HE STATED, HE IS A RAilROAD EMPLOYEE AND IS IN fREQUENT ASSOCIATION WITH <br />TRANSIENTS' OMING THROUGH TOWN AND HE BELIEVES THE LOCATION Of A MISSION AT 1492 WEST 2ND AVENUE WOULD <br />BE VERY BAD INFLUENCE ON CHILDREN IN THE AREA. MR. ALBRIGHT fURTHER STATED HE HAS ATTEMPTED TO IM- <br />PROVE THE H USES WHICH HE OWNS BUT HAS BEEN TOLD BY HIS TENANTS If THE MISSION LOCATES THERE THEY WILL <br />BE FORCED T MOVE; HE ALSO STATED HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT fOR THE CHILDREN, ABOUT THE <br />ANNUAL ECON MIC-LOSS Of $500 TO $1000 fOR RENTS, AND ABOUT A GENERAL DEVALUATION Of HIS PROPERTY. HE <br />PLEADED THA THE COUNCIL RECONSIDER THIS MATTER AND TAKE INTO CONSI,DERATION THE HOME OWNERS SIDE. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MR. HUGHES F THE WHITEAKER PTA STATED THAT HE HAD PRESENTED THE QUESTION OF THE EUGENE MISSION BEFORE <br />A LABOR ORG NIZATION TO WHICH HE BELONGS WHO DO PLASTERING, BRICKLAYING AND OTHER ALLIED CRAFTS, INDI- <br />CATED THE B ICKMASONS HAVE STATED THAT If THE:MISSION CAN FIND A PLOT Of GROUND, THEY.WILL DONATE THEIR <br /> <br />LABOR TO 'CO PLETE A BUILDING; HE FURTHER STATED THAT THE OWNER OF W,LLAMETTE GRAYSTONE PRODUCTS HAS <br /> <br />.~ <br />