|
<br />(-.~ -<' ;"i;
<br />~lo
<br />
<br />4/10/61
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />
<br />87% OF THE TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE OF THE PROPERT I E,S TO, BE ASSESSED WAS REP,RESENTED.
<br />WAS PO I NTED OUT THAT TH I S COMPLETED THE STREETS "I N THE FA I R OAKS SUBD I V I SON, AND
<br />COMMITTEE, RECOMMENDED THESE STREETS BE PAVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT
<br />THE
<br />
<br />, "
<br />14. PAVING CARMEL AVENUE, LONG ISLAND DRIVE, MONTEREY LANE AND DIANE LANE - A: PETITION
<br />WAS PRESENTED TO THE GROUP ON WHICH 94% OF THE TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE OF THE PROPERTY TO
<br />BE ASSESSED WAS REPRESENTED FOR THE IMPROVING OF CARMEL AVENUE FROM EAST BOYNDARY OF
<br />MEADOWLARK TO NORTH BOUNDARY OF MEADOWLARK ADDITIONj LONG ISLAND DRIVE FROM SOUTH
<br />BOUNDARY OF MEADOWLARK TO NORTH BOUNDARY OF MEADOWLARKj MONTEREY LANE FROM WEST
<br />BOUNDARY OF MEADOWLARK TO LONG ISLAND DRIVE; AND'DIANE STREET FROM SO~TH BOUNDARY
<br />MEA,DOWLARK TO 'CARMEL AVENUE. THE COMM ITTEE RECOMMENDE,D JHAT THESE STREETS BE 'PAVED.
<br />MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />2
<br />
<br />15. PAVING ALDER STREET FROM NORTH BOUNDARY FIRST, ADDIT,ION TO P,NECREST ESTATES TO 43RD
<br />AVENUE,'AND HILYARD STREET FROM ALDER STREET TO, EAST BOUNDA~Y OF UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS
<br />ADD I T I ON - A PET I j,l ON WAS PRESE:NTED FOR PAV I NG. THE ABOVE DESCR I BED STREETS ON WH I CH
<br />100% OF THE TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE OF PROPERTIES TO BE ASSESSED WAS REPRESENTED. IT WAS
<br />POINTED,OUT THAT THIS PRO:JECT'TIES IN WITH A, PREVI,OUS PETITION W,H,ICH HAD .BE~N APPROVED
<br />EARLIER, AND IT WOULD BE BEST TO REVOKE THOSE ORDINANCES AND ADOPT NEW ORDINANCE? COVER-
<br />ING BOTH PETITIONS SO THAT WORK COULD BE DONE UNDER ONE CONTRACT. THE COMMITTEERECOM-
<br />MENDED THE,SE,' STREE,TS BE PAVED AND THAT THE- REPORT OF THE, 01 RECTOR 0 F PUB.L I C WORKS BE
<br />ACCEPTED. MOT ION CARR I ED UNAN IM00S,L Y.
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />16. PAVING McMILLAN STREET FROM 27TH TO 28TH AVENUE - A PETIT,ION WAS PRESENT,ED TO :THE .COM-
<br />M I,TTEE ON, WH I CH 64% OF THE :TOTAL FRONT, FOOT,AGE OF T,HE PR,OPERT I ES TO BE ASSESSED W!,-,S RE-
<br />PRESENTED. THE COMM I TTEE RE,COMMENDED THE A~OVE DE,SCR I BE,D STREET BE PAVED. MOT I ON
<br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />4 I 17. SEWER AND PAVING ON FILMORE STREET FROM LORANE HIGHWAY TO NORTH BOUNDARY LOT 4, BLOCK 3,
<br />1ST ADDITION TO SOUTH SIDE HILLS - A PETITION WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE ON WHICH
<br />100% OF THE TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE OF THE PROPERTI ESTO BE ASSESSED WAS ,REpRESENTED, AND
<br />THE ,COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED: THAT 'THE .SEWER CONSTRUCTION ,AND :STREET PAVING 'BE UNDER,TAKEN.
<br />MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SEC,ONDED BY MR~ CHATT TH,AT ITEMS II, THROUGH 17 ,OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br />APPROVED. MOTI~N CARRIED.
<br />
<br />5
<br />
<br />lB. CONDEMNATION SUITS FOR WEST SIDE TRUNK SEWER CONSTRUCTION - THE CITY ATTpRNEY STATED
<br />THAT SOME DIFfiCULTY HAD ARISEN IN SETTLING THE CHRISTOFFERSON CONDEMNATION SUIT FOR
<br />THE CONSTRUCT ION :OF THE WEST S I DE TRUNK: SEWER, ,ANQ T,HAT -.IT W,AS QUEST 10NAB_LE, WHETHER
<br />A 60' ROAD DEDICATION WAS NEEDED FOR THE ACCESS TO THE PUMPING STATION SITE. IT, W,AS ,
<br />HIS RECOMMENDATION AND THAT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THAT THE EARLIER AUTHORIZA-
<br />T I ON OF THECOMM I,TTEE BE REV I SED TO -I NCL UDE THAT T,HE: CHR I STOFFERSON CONDEMNAT I ON SU IT
<br />BE ATTEMPTED TO BE SETTLE OUT' OF COURT' FOR AN AM,o.UNT Of '$ 1060 - I F 'THE CHR,ISTOFF,ERSONS
<br />WOULD AGREE ,TO DEDICATING A 40' RIG,HT-OF-WAY FOR, ROAD PURPOSES. IF THECHRISTOFFERSpNS
<br />FA I L TO OED I CATE THE R I GHT-Of-WA Y F.OR STREET PURPOSES, THAT .THE C I,TY A-r:TORNEY BE
<br />AUTHORIZED TO SETTLE THE CONDEMNATION SUIT FOR $800. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY ~HAT
<br />THE COMMITTEE RECOMMEND APP.ROVAL OF THE CITY'ATTORNE.Y'S RECOMMENQATION.
<br />
<br />THE CITY ATTORNEY STATED THAT THE LOMBARD CONDEMNATION SUIT WOULD BE HEARD IN CIRCUIT
<br />COURT I N THE ,NEAR FUTURE. HE PO I NTED OUT THAT, THE C I TYHAD PASSED THROUGH THE LOMBARD
<br />PROPERTY FOR'A DiSTANCE OF-437"DURiNG'THE'CONSTRUCTioN'OF THE 'WEST SiDE'TRuNK SEWER
<br />AND WE.RE SE.EK I NG AN E.ASEMEN"T FOR'"TH 1 SOl STANCE. HE FURTHER' STATED THAT THE CITY HAD
<br />TENDERED IN COURT $4BO ,WHEN THE CONDEMNAT'ION SUnS WERE ,F.lL.ED., ,THE LOMBARDS WERE; CLAIM-
<br />ING .DAMAGE OF $1740. THE CITY ATT;ORNEY, pOI"!TED OUT THA1 IT W,AS ,HIS C~LCULATIONS THAT
<br />COURT COSTS COULD RUN AS HIGH AS :$2490. HE STATED THAT HE ,WOULD RECOMMEND THA.T HE,' BE
<br />AUTHORIZED TO SETTLE "THE LOMBARD CONDEMNATION~UIT- ,OUT OF .C()URT F.OR AN AMOUNT OF ,~950.
<br />THE COMMIT"TEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE CIT:Y ATTORNEY BE; AYTHORIZED TO SETTL,E THE, LOMBARD
<br />CONDEMNATION SUIT OUT Of COURT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $950. MOTION C~RRI~D UNANI-
<br />MOUSL Y.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. CHATT, THAT ITEM 18 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE 'APPROVED.
<br />ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />6
<br />
<br />19. PARKING DISTRICT ,PETITION -,VINCENT FARINA, CHAIRMAN OF'THE RETAIL. MERCHAtilTSD.VISION
<br />OF THE CHAMBER .OFCOMMERCE AND A MEMBER OF ~H~ EUGENE,PL~N~ING COMMISSION, p~Ea~N~ED,
<br />A PETITION ASKING THE CITY COUNCIL TO INITIATE A PARKING DISTRICT THROU~H SPEC.IAL
<br />ASSESSMENT FOR A PARKING LOT WHICH IS A PORTION OF THE OLD ELKS LODGE PROPERTY. HE
<br />POINTED OUT THAT T~E PETI~ION REPRESENTS OVER 50_ Of THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ToaE ASSESSED
<br />FOR 'THE PARK i NG DI STR ICT ~OVER 5Q% OF THE NUMBER ,OF P~RCELs' ro BE, ASSESSED, AND OVER
<br />56% OF- THE ASSESSED VALUAT ION OF THE pROPERTY TO BE 'ASSESSED. ,MR. FAR I NA F,'AVORED THE
<br />PROPOSED PARK I NG 01 STR 1 CT A~Q :;URGED TI-!E. GOMM.I TTEE TO SUPPORT STRONG~ Y TH I S PROGRAM.
<br />HE HOPED THAT' THE COUNC I L COULD EXTEND ,SUCH A PARK I NG 01 STR' cr' TO OTHER :AREAS OF THE
<br />CITY. THE CITY MANAGER POINTED OUT THAT NO CI~~HAD ~S~D 1H~ STATE ENABLING LEGISLA-
<br />TION FOR PARKING' DISTRIC'TS, AND THAT SUCH A P~RKING DISTRICT COULD BE TESTED IN THE
<br />COURTS. THE COMMtTTEE RECOMME~DE~THAT THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR PARKING
<br />PROCEED, ALL PRESENT VOTING,AYE, EXCEPT MR. CHRISTENSEN VOTI,NGNAY.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />if
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />,;
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />-
<br />
|