|
<br />r 198
<br />
<br />1'-':"--
<br />
<br />1/28/63
<br />
<br />--- -~ "'=" - - ,.,...~. -,~.
<br />'""..-....'--,.,....,.....:_~- -""
<br />
<br />- ""-~!>r-"
<br />
<br />---~----~....---...--,.---
<br />....-_c-..",........''''" _,~ ___..:,... 'or- .,
<br />
<br />.~~~
<br />_~"'-:-:t_ ..."" .,,., -,.-_ ',._
<br />
<br />_ -..-.-...- ...--"---.. -
<br />''=-< "'" -,,--,~- -
<br />
<br />-- ......-._--- .....
<br />:..-.;;,.- ....- - .."'-.><= ".- ...~-
<br />
<br />I. BID OPENING SALE OF LOTS - A TABULAT,ION OF BlpS WAS PRESENTED COVERING BIDS OPENED AT
<br />10:00 A.M. ON,-JANUARY'2',3, 1963 O'N 'THE' SAL~, OF THREE LOTS AT 26TH AND JEFFERSON, 250' EAST
<br />38TH, AND 3050 F~RRY~ MRS. LAURIS M9VED SEC9ND~D,BY MR. HAWK TO ACCEPT THE HiGH BID IN
<br />EACH INSTANCE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />2. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, OCTOBER 12 STORM DAMAGE - A LETTER FROM THE OREGON STATE HIGH-
<br />WAY DEPARTM~NT WAS READ WHICH EXPLAINED THE BILLING ENCLOSE~ WITH THE LETTER WAS MARKED
<br />PAID FOR THE USE OF STATE EQUIPMENT USED IN CLEANUP WORK AFTER THE OCTOBER 12 STORM.
<br />MRS. LAURIS MOVED SECONDED BY MR. HAWK TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PREPAID BILLING FROM THE HIGH-
<br />WAY DEPARTMENT AND TO THANK THEM FOR THEIR'CO~OPERATION INTHE USE OF THE EQUIPMENT.
<br />MOT I ON CARR I ED..
<br />
<br />2
<br />
<br />3. O,VERPASS 30TH AND POTTER - AN EX,CERPTFROM THE, M,INUTES'OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT #4 BOARD
<br />MEET I NG HEL,D DECEMBER: J7, 1962 WAS READ WI TJ:i REGARD TO THE POS I T I ON OF THE BOARD ON A
<br />PROPOSED OVERPASS AT 30TH AVENUE AND POTTER ,STREp. TH'E SCHOOL DI S.TRI CT PROPOSED TO
<br />ASSUME .ONE-THIRD OF THE COST OF ~ONSTRUCTION OF THE OVERPASS WHEN IT IS JOINTLY DETER-
<br />MINED pY THE CITY,AND TH~ DISTRICT THAT rHIS )S,THE ADVISABLE SOLUTI9N TO THE PROBLEM
<br />OF PROVIDING SAFE PASSAGE ACROSS 30TH AVENUE. IT WAS ALSO RECOMMENDED BY THE BOAR'D
<br />, THAT THE CIT.Y AND SCHOOL DI'STRICT #4 CO-OPERATE IN A STUDY OF THE SCHOOL CROSSING PROBL:!E~S.
<br />. .. - ~ '. . . .. . . " . .. - . -....
<br />AT ALL SCHOOLS, I,N THE CITY .IN ORD~R TO. EST,ABL,ISH_PRI9RITY AND PRACTICES TO BE FOLLOWED IN
<br />FUTURE TIMES. MRS. LA,URIS MOVED SECONDED BY MR~ PEVERELL TOREFE:R THIS, PROPOSAL"TO THE
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION FO.R ,CO-ORDINATION A:ND RE,COMMENDATION~. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />" . / '
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />4. UNITED A.IRLlNESBuILD'ING ATMAHLON,SWEETAIRPORT - UPO,NI,NVES_TI~ATIO,N BY THE PUBL.IC
<br />WORKS DEPARTMENT, IT WAS REPORTED THAT IT IS VERY UNLIKELY THE UNITED AIRLINES BUILDING
<br />AT MAHLON SWEET FIELD CAN BE MOVED WITHOUT SEVERE DAMAGE TO THE STRUCTURE. THE HOUSE '
<br />MOVING.fIRM,OF,AHREAND,RJCHMOND CONCURRED.lN THIS CONCLUSION. 'jllHE REPORT WAS ACCEPT.ED;
<br />NO ACTION WAS TAKEN.
<br />
<br />MR. CHATT MOVED SEC.oNDED B'( MRS. LAURIS ,TO APPROVE ITEMS 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE COMMITTEE ,REPORT;. MOTION
<br />CARRIED.
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />5. UNI TED, A I RL I NES LEA,SE :AGREEMENT ,- A PRO~OSED ,AGREEMENT WAS ,PRESENTED, REGARD I NG LEASE OF
<br />SPACE AT MAHLON SWEE:T'AI~P,ORTBY UNiTED A'IRL.INES~ ',THE AGREEMENT 'WAS SIMilAR TO THE O'NE
<br />pREV:IOUSL'( SIGN.ED B'l'WEST'COAST AfRL'INES A~D,',I$-:TO fjE I,N EHECT UNTICMARCH 31':'964
<br />WHEN OCCUPANCY O~:THE NE~TERMINAL BUILDING WOULD NECESSITATE A NEW AGREEMENT: MR~.LAURIS
<br />MOVED SECONDED BY MR. DEVERELL TO ACCEPT THE TE'RMS OF' THE PROPO'SED LEASE. MOT ION' CARR I ED.
<br />. ." .
<br />
<br />MR. CHATT MOVED .SECONDED BY :MRS., .LAUR I, S THAT, ITEM:5 OF THE COMM I TTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. ROLLCALL VOTE.
<br />ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />5 6. SIGN VARIANCE 1849 OAK STREET, BRYCE NOSLER - MR. NOSLER WAS APPEALING A DECISION BY
<br />THE BOARD OF ApPEALS AT THEIR MEETING ON JULY I I, 1962 DENYING A REQUESTED SIGN AT
<br />1849 OAK STREE-T.: A ,LA,YQU,!' WAS PRESENTED SHOW ING ,T1~E,LOCAT ION' OF THE PR~POSED S r'GN T~ BE
<br />ERECTED ON POLES INSTEAQ OF: FLAT'AGAINST t.HE'~iJILDINGAsRtQUI,RED IN'"(HIS ZONE. DR.PURDY
<br />MOVED ,SECQNDED BY MR. :CRAKES TO TA,BLE THE MATTER UNTIL THE SITE COULD BE'VIEWED BY THE
<br />,'COUNCI,L. ,MOTION CARRIED. ,., '. ,,' .
<br />
<br />MR. CHATT MOVED SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS TO APPROVE ITEM 6 OF THE COMMI'TTEE REPORT. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />. ,
<br />6 7. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT - JANUARY 2, 1963
<br />A. REZONING TO C-3P AREA AT 3210 THROUGH 3340 ALDER, ALBERTSONS - THIS REQUEST 'WAS TO
<br />REZONE THE AREA FROM R~I TO C-3P,FQR THE P~RPOSE OF ESTAB~I~~ING,.AN ALBERTSONS MARKET,
<br />LOCATIONG OF WHICH WAS SHOWN BY SKETCH PRESENTED BY MR. DAVE KNOX, REPRESENTING ALBERT-
<br />SONS AND BENNETTS COMMUNITY BUILDERS. THE P~ANNING COMMisSION'HAD'R~COMMiNDED'DENI~L
<br />,0: THE REZONIN9 REQUEST. MR.. ~KNO~ INTRODUCED MR. DEWEY ,BILLS oFA':-BERTSON~~WH() P~E-
<br />SENTED REASONS FOR THE SELECT I O~ OF: TH-'-S ,PART I CULA~. 5 I TE OVER TWO .OTHER POSSI,BI LI TIES,
<br />AND ALSO PRESENTED AN ARCHITECT'S SKETCH OF THE PROPOSED BUFFER WALL ALONG ALDER
<br />STREET AND, THE INTENDED PLANT I NGS. , MR. DAN E3LUME, ARES I ~E~T OF TI:IE ARE~~ STA~ED THAT
<br />IN HIS OPINION THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE MARKET WOULD NOT LOWER PROPERTY VALUES AND THAT
<br />THE MARKET WOULD POSSIBLY BE AN ASSET TO THE AREA. STATEMENTS WERE ALSO PRESENTED BY
<br />MR. GEORGE E~ BOGGS, EVELYN PRUDEN AND CARL,E. SIEGEL INDICATING THAt IN THEiR Op!~-'
<br />IONS THE PROPERTY VALUES WOULD NOT' BE LOWERED BY THE ESTABL I SHME,NT OF THE, MARKET.
<br />A PETITION BEARING 33 SIGNATU~E; ~~S'ALSO PR~S~NTED fAVORIN~ TH~ZONE CHANGE.-
<br />
<br />MR. MA~ INGERSON, AN ~,TTORI':lEY,AND:ALSO,A, RE~IDENT<?~ THE AR~A,.SPOK~,OPPOSING THE.ZONE
<br />CHANGE, STATING THAT IN HtS O~INION THE ESTABLISHM~NT_O~ THE MARKET AT THIS PARTICULAR
<br />SPOT WOULD ~E HAZARDOUS: FOR MANY SMALL C~IL~REN IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREA, ADJACENT TO
<br />" ,
<br />THE LOCATION AND THAT THE TRAFFIC FLOW WOULD BE GREATLY INCREASED WHICH MIGHT CAUSE
<br />FURTHER. CONGESTION, AND ALSO STATING THAT, TH~ AREA.HAD BEEN. ZONED R-I RESIDENTIAL
<br />FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS. A PETITION WAS PRESENTED CARRYING' SIGNATURES OF 34 PERSONS
<br />OPPOSED TO THE ZONE CHANGE. OTHERS SPEAKING AGAINST THE CHANGE IN ZONE WERE MRS.lE6Nt
<br />EATON, MR. CARL BURTON, MR. ED ALLEN AND MR. C~ARL~S PORTER.
<br />
<br />MR.' VINCE F~RINE, A MEMBER O~ THE PLANNING COM~ISSION"THEN STATED THAT THE VOTE OF
<br />.,THE,PLANN1NG COMMISS10N HAD BEEN DEEMED PE$T FOR THE, ENTIRE COMMUNITY AND THE AREA
<br />IN WH IC H ALBERTSONS HAD PROPOSED TO ESTABL I SH A M~RK~T. IT WA~ THE FEEL I NG OF THE
<br />PLANNING COMMISS~ON THAT REZONING FOR THE SAKE OF COMPETITION SHOULD BE NO CRITERION
<br />FOR ACTION BY'THE PLANNJNG COM~IS~ION.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />...... _.. .:...._-..~-
<br />...." ._~..-._..,..,. ._"'~----~
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />!I
<br />
<br />'-
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />.--.-."--" -
<br />".-':"-.c:. .- ~ - .'_
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|