Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r328 <br />e <br /> <br />__ 6[24763 -- . <br />""",.... . ...-..::0-_ T'-_~''''''''''''''''''''--_ ~ ~",~....._,. "" .....-;~;.o_. ."-'~' .r~~_"""_,""","""';.:;:-"..__-_"';',,,",''''_ "C"'"","~~__._, ~._~~-:,--:"~~~~""-,,~_---=_..._-~--,,,,,--~..:.--.---... ....",.~~,,;.-;;::.~.._.._-.;..~;:_~-~~,-:;_~"::...-.--..: ,"",."'_...,,-c. <br /> <br />. ~ _ . ..... . . -.. . .'.~ .... .,...... .... ... '" ....... .... '..".. ..'., .....,. ,u.~-""I ..-...... . .. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I, ! I <br /> <br />, I <br />SAN ITARY SEWERS CONTRACT COST/ I <br />NAME OF PROJECT AND BIDDER COST ZONE FT. ~ <br />AREA WITHIN KUYKENDALL SUBDIVISION II <br />NORTHWAY CONSTRUCTION CO. (Low) $ 1,971.25 . $ 4.58 I <br />GEORGE MOORE & ASSQCIATES, INC. 2,130.50 ~ <br /> <br />WILLAKENZIE AREA SEWERS r <br />. ." . I <br />IMPRQVEMENT- DISTRICT No. WS-63-2 I <br />GEORGE MOORE & .ASSOCIATES, ,INC. 36,773.00 4.26 I <br />NORTHWAY CONSTRUCTION CO. 53;912.00 J <br />M & S CONSTRUCTION CO.54,048.00 !i <br />I WILDISH CONSTRUCTION CO. 56,198.30 ~ <br />'I II <br />I, MRS. LAUR I S MOVED SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT THE CONTRACTS BE AWARDED TO THE LOW i; e <br />i BIDDER ON EACH OF THE PROJECTS. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, II <br />11 M<llTI<ilN CARRIED. Ii <br /> <br />I 'j TH I S BE I NG THE DATE SET FOR THE AWARD OF' CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCT ION OF 8TH Ii <br />I AVEN_ U~ TRUNK SEWER, THE FOLLOWING ~ABULATION WAS PRESENTED OF BIDS OPENED AT.~O:OO A.M. 'I' <br />I .JUNE ,24, _ 1963: I <br /> <br />I:! I- <br />,. , I' <br />I CONTRACT ENGINE~RS'CON~ULTANTS' 1 <br />I NAME OF PROJECT AND BIDDER "" PRICE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE Ij_d <br /> <br />I 8TH AVENUE TRUNK SEWER LINE '1 <br />I M & S CONSTRUCTION CqMPANY, (Low) $789,228.60 $711,581 ~45 $673~ 161.4', !I <br />. - .. . . j <br />I TEEPLES & THATCHERJIND. 907,453.50 Ii <br />I ' II <br />1 LORD BROS,.CONTRACTORS, INC. .9~4,171.00 I; <br />1 .. <br />Ii MRS. LAURIS MOVED SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT THE CONTRACT BEAWARDED TO M'& S CON- '111 <br />, I <br />I STRUCTION COMPANY ON THEIR LOW BID PRICE OF $786,898.00, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF U.S. q <br />! PUBLIC HEALT~:SERVICE. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION ~ <br />I CARRIED. Ii <br />j _ 1i <br />i . . COMMITTEE REPORTS "' I~' <br />I \: <br />I COMMITTEE MEETING HELD JUNE 20, 1963:!1 <br />I; '" ' I! ~ <br />j I'PRE~ENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN CHATT"SWAN~ON, CHRISTENSEN, DEVERELL, C~AKES, Ii <br />I HAWK, AND PURDY; CITY MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; CITY ATT6RNEY; ADMiN~~ U <br />i STRAT I VE Ass I STANT CASTNER; 01 RECTOR OF PUBL I C WORKS; AND OTHERS. !I <br />I I' <br />I \': <br />2 I I. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT - MAY 27, 1963 ! <br />i A. ANNEXATION BOY 'Scour: PROPERTY ;2525 CENTENN I AL BOULEVARD - THEil'. <br />! PLA,t:4NING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE 100% CONSENT PETI- I 1 <br />" TION FOR ANNEXATION OF THIS PROPERTY. MR. CHRISTENSEN MOVED SECONDED _~ <br />BY MR. CHATT TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIE.D. 1:__ <br />j . ' , Ii <br />I I[ <br />: MRS. LAURIS MOVED SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT ITEM IA OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE AP- 'II <br />I PROVED. MOTION CARRIED. I <br />I :1 <br />! ' <br />3 I 2. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT - JUNE 10, 1963 II <br />Ii A. REZO.NING, TO R-3G PROPERTY ON 3RD WEST OF PEARL, FRANCIS .AND AMVBROOKS,' ,I A <br />I No. 63-048 - THIS ITEM HADBEE-N REFERRED BACK TO' THE PLANNING COMMI,S- -. I!. <br />. , , , ,. 'I <br />SION BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR Co.NS/DERATION AS R-3G, AND THE PLANNI'NG I' <br />I COMM1SSIONNOW RECOMMENDS DEN'~L ~F THE REQUEST. MR. CHRISTENSEN MOVED l <br />I T>OCURHOI:D THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMLSS/ON. MOTION WAS 1'1 <br />II NOT SECONDED. - I I <br /> <br />I . , I: <br />I BOTH MR. A~D MRS.'~ROQKS WER~PRESENT, AND MRS. BROOKS, SPEAKING ~lriST -~ <br />I ON BEHALF OF' THE -SUGGE,STED RE.Z,ON/NG, STATE'D THAT THE AREA NEEDS SOME. '! <br />'! NEW BU I LD I NGS AND 'THAT SEVERAL OF THE NE I GHBORS ARE VERY MUCH -. N AP-' II <br />I PROVAL OF THE BROOKS IMPROVEMENT TO THE AREA. MR. BROOKS THEN SPOKE r <br />I IN BEHALF OF THE REZONING PROPOSAL STATING THAT IT IS THEIR INTENTION Ii <br />TO ~IVE APPROXI:MATELY.16 FEET -TO THE Cn'y, :AS A _ STREET DEDICATION TO Ii <br />WIDEN THE PRESENT STREET. MR. CAMPBELL WAS ALSO PRESENT AND SPOKE I <br />AGAlN~T ,THE PROPO~ED ~EZONIN~, HIS ARGUMENT BEING,MORE OR LES~,CON- _ ~ <br />CER-NE.D WI,TH THE PARKING AND ~RAFF'C PROBLEMS WHICH WOULD BE ENGENDERED If <br />1 BY THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PROPO~ED BUILDING. 1 <br />i II <br />, MR. SWANSON MOVED SECONDED BY MR. CRAKES TO REZONE THE ENT I RE AREA TO i! ,,~, <br />! R-3G AS OR I G I NALL Y PRESENTED TO THE PLANN I NG COMM I SS I ON AND RECOMMENDED :' ~ <br />I BY THEM. MOTION CARRIED, MESSRS. CHRISTENSEN AND DEVERELL VOTING NO. ~ <br />I I, <br />! 6/24/63 - 2 !I <br />, I' <br />I I <br /> <br />1\ I . <br />1\ ,I <br />~L Ii <br />