|
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />2it~
<br />
<br />6/10/68
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />Bids - Public Works, Opened June 7,
<br />PAVING, SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS
<br />Project and Name of Bidder
<br />1,F1intridge 3rd Addition
<br />McKenzie Road & Driveway
<br />Bostick & Sons Construction
<br />Wi1dish Construction Company
<br />
<br />1968
<br />Contract
<br />Cost
<br />BASIC
<br />$ 117,763.68
<br />No Bid
<br />126,801.40
<br />ALTERNATE
<br />117,353.25
<br />119,371.94
<br />122,659.85
<br />
<br />$13,050.00
<br />per frnt ft
<br />levy
<br />
<br />Cost Per
<br />Sq/Frnt Ft
<br />
<br />Cost to
<br />City
<br />
<br />Amount
<br />Budgeted
<br />
<br />Sntry Swr
<br />$ 3,960.00
<br />0.075
<br />0,005
<br />Strm Swr
<br />$ 3,558.00
<br />374.48/lot
<br />
<br />McKenzie Road & Driveway
<br />Bostick & Sons Construction
<br />Wildish Construction Company
<br />
<br />10.43-36'Pvng
<br />7.90-28'Pvng
<br />6.64-24'Pvng
<br />4.ll-l6'Pvng
<br />
<br />Completion Date: October 1, 1968
<br />
<br />2.Churchill Highlands Addition
<br />Bethe1-Danebo Sand & Gravel
<br />Eugene Sand & Gravel
<br />McKenzie Road& Driveway
<br />Wildish Construction Company
<br />
<br />BASIC
<br />37,201.10
<br />No Bid
<br />37,327.01
<br />38,636.70
<br />ALTERNATE
<br />35,138.39
<br />35,637.30
<br />35,953.40
<br />37,127.72
<br />
<br />7.l3-28'Pvng
<br />8.76-36'Pvng
<br />0.04168 Sntry Swr
<br />0.005 Levy
<br />
<br />Completion Date: October 1, 1968
<br />
<br />McKenzie Road & Driveway
<br />Wi1dish Construction Company
<br />Eugene Sand & Gravel
<br />Bethel-Danebo Sand & Gravel
<br />
<br />The Public Works Department recommended acceptance of the low basic bid on Items 1, 3, 5,
<br />and 9 on the June 3 opening; low alternate bid (deep strength asphalt) on Items 2,4,6, and
<br />10; low bid on Items 8 and 11; low alternate bid on overlay on 1st between Lawrence and
<br />Adams under Item 7, and low bid on the balance of the overlay projects (whether basic or
<br />alternate) subject to successful outcome of the June 18, 1968 election; and with award of
<br />contract on Items 5 and 6 to the second-low bidder if the City Attorney rules unbalanced
<br />bids were submitted by the low bidder.
<br />
<br />With regard to the bid tabulation of June 7, 1968, the Public Works Department recommended
<br />acceptance of the low alternate bids on each project, with the award of contract on the
<br />F1intridge 3rd Addition project to the second-low bidder if the City Atrorney rules the
<br />low bidder submitted unbalanced bids.
<br />
<br />Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mrs. Lauris to award contracts as recommended.
<br />
<br />With regard to paving Olive and 34th, a representative of Lenord Cowley, owner of property at 124 West
<br />34th, protested inclusion of 34th Avenue in the project on the basis of limited benefit to the property
<br />and resulting narrow street with no general access. A letter of protest from Mr. Cowley was presented.
<br />Also, a letter of protest from Joseph and Rose Harl, 150 West 34th.
<br />
<br />The Public Works Director reviewed Council action at the time Olive and 34th petition was presented.
<br />He said at this time owners of a little more than 60% of the property to be assessed between McMillan
<br />and Olive on 34th are in favor of the paving.
<br />
<br />Mr. Lew Wright, 3393 Olive Street, restated his position in favor of paving 34th between Olive and
<br />MCMillan.
<br />
<br />On the Crest Drive paving, Willamette to Lincoln, Mr. Clarence Scott, 23 Crest Drive, questioned the
<br />desirability of paving since the street, he said, has been paved twice in the past 25 years. The
<br />Public Works Director said tests were taken and the street will be constructed to heavier than stand-
<br />ard design because of soil conditions. The Director also pointed out that previous surfacing was
<br />not paved- to' engineerd standards but was an oil mat done by Lane County.
<br />
<br />A letter was read from C. H.Strong, 1655 Prospect Drive, objecting to the Birch Lane project. The
<br />Public Works Director said a 24-foot street on a 30-foot right-of-way is proposed, with parking re-
<br />stricted. He said the right-of-way is not sufficient for sidewalks, nor would they be suitable from
<br />a topographical standpoint,
<br />
<br />A rollcall vote was taken on the motion as stated, and motion carried, all councilmen present voting
<br />aye.
<br />
<br />2
<br />
<br />Bills for the period May 28 through June 10, 1968 were submitted and read as follows:
<br />
<br />6/10/68 - 4
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|