Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 309~ <br /> . <br /> 8/5/68 <br /> . A vote was taken on the amendment to Section 10.12. Motion carried. <br /> A vote was taken on the amendment to Section 10.13. Motion carried. <br /> The question was called for on the adoption of the new Section 10.3 <br /> Councilman Wingard expressed concern about the six-month removal period for signs under <br /> Section 4.5 and 4.8 and the five-year period for string lights. <br /> Dr. Purdy moved to amend the new Section 10.3 A to exclude Sections 4.5 and 4.8. There was no second. <br /> Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to amend the new Section 10.3 A to change the three-year <br /> period to five years, delete all language contained in parentheses beginning, "(The added time...)," <br /> and to exclude Section 4.8. Motion carried. <br /> A vote was taken on adoption of the new Section 10.3 as amended, and motion as amended carried. <br /> .. A vote was taken on the motion to adopt Section 10 as amended. Motion as amended carried. <br /> Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to adopt Section 11 - Definitions - including the correc- <br /> tions listed on the Summary of Changes to Sign Ordinance to August 5, 1968. Motion carried. <br /> . Mr.Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to adopt Section 12 - Enforcement and Administration. <br /> . Mr. Fadeley requested the section be amended to allow the Appeals Board a method of pre- <br /> venting hardship with regard to specific signs. <br /> Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr. Anderson to amend the last sentence of Section 12.21 to read "...re- <br /> lated to the cost, size, or location of a new sign.... " Motion carried. <br /> Councilman Wingard asked the City Attorney for his opinion with regard to the provisions <br /> of Section 12.22 A which excludes members of the sign industry from the Board of Appeals. <br /> The City Attorney said it was legal as written. Considerable discussion followed with <br /> the main point being the numerous times a member would be abstaining from voting because <br /> of conflict of interest should he have financial interest in the sign industry. The City <br /> Attorney was asked what constituted financial interest, and he replied it would be same- <br /> t one connected with the sign industry - a manager, stockholder in a corporation, an employe, etc. <br /> Hal Cross suggested appointment of a member of the sign industry to the Board with an <br /> alternate member to serve in the event of abstention. <br /> Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. McNutt to amend Section 12.22 A to provide for appointment of a <br /> member of the sign industry to serve as adviser only to the Board of Appeals and without a vote, the <br /> term to be for three years. <br /> Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward to amend the amendment making the term of service one year. <br /> Motion defeated, Councilwomert Lauris and Hayward voting yes. <br /> . A vote was taken on the amendment to Section 12.22 A as originally stated, and motion carried, <br /> Councilwomen Lauris and Hayward voting no. <br /> A vote was taken on the motion to adopt Section 12 as amended, and motion as amended carried. <br /> Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to adopt Section 13 - Conflict and Severability. Motion <br /> carried. <br /> &- Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to adopt Section 14 - Amendments and Change in District <br /> Boundaries - including the addition to Section 14.02 recommended by the Planning Commission arid <br /> listed on the Summary of Changes to Sign Ordinance to August 5, 1968, giving notice of public hear- <br /> ing of any proposed change in district boundaries. Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to adopt Section 15 - Penalties. Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to adopt Section 16 - Effective Date. Motion carried. <br /> It was agreed that final action on Sections 6 and 17 would be delayed until the final ordinance <br /> document incorporating the amendments is prepared and brought back for consideration. <br /> . Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to reconsider Section 4.5. Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Wingard moved seconded by Mr. Lassen that Section 4.5 as originally recommended and presented by <br /> ., the Planning Commission be adopted. Motion carried, Mrs. Lauris voting no. <br /> On motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the meeting was adjourned. <br /> ~L~ <br /> H McKinley <br /> ~. City Manager <br /> 8/5/68 - 5 .... <br />