Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />-t <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br />45- <br /> <br />2/10/69 <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the progress payments as presented and read be allowed <br />and proper City officials draw the necessary warrants. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting <br />aye, motion carried. <br /> <br />ORDINANCES <br /> <br />1 Council Bill No.J8692 - Amending Code re: Loitering or Prowling and Repealing present Section <br />32.65 was submitted and read the first time in full on January 13, 1969 and lacking unanimous consent <br />on second reading by council bill number only was held over to the meeting of February 3, 1969, and <br />lacking unanimous consent was held over for further consideration to the meeting of February 10, 1969. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the council bill be read the third time by council <br />bill number with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read <br />the third time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be approved and given final passage. <br /> <br />A memorandum was read from the City Attorney in answer to questions asked previously by Councilman <br />Mohr. Mr. Mohr did not want his motives misunderstood, and stated that it had been his intention <br />to explore all aspects of the bill berore passing such an Ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Les Swanson, a Eugene attorney, commented that ordinances of this type give the police power <br />which may be unnecessary. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued regarding the ;need for an ordinance which allowed a police officer to question <br />persons under unusual circumstances at unusual hours. The Police Chief stated the city's officers <br />are well enough trained to be able to ascertain what constituted such circumstances and to protect <br />citizens rights. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr asked the City Attorney if the present Ordinance was not sufficient for this purpose, and <br />the Attorney replied that the present Ordinance should be repealed and a new one substituted. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to table action on this Ordinance until the next regular <br />Council meeting. A vote was taken, with Mrs. Beal and Mr. Mohr in favor, Mrs. Hayward, Dr. Purdy, Mr. <br />McDonald, Mr. Wingard,?Mr. Gribskov and Mr. Teague voting no. The motion failed. <br /> <br />A rollcall vote was taken on the motion for final passage of the ordinance. All councilmen voted aye <br />except Mrs. Beal who voted no. Motion carried. Bill declared passed and numbered 15531. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mr. Wingard that a committee of four persons, to study revision of the <br />criminal code and to act in an advisory capacity to the Council, be appointed by the Mayor, with :-. - ,'t'".. <br />recommendations for appointments from the Council. <br /> <br />There was a discussion of revision of the Code by the Bureau of Governmental Research, 'and whether <br />the suggested committee should be formed before or after the Code revision is completed. The City <br />Attorney stated that such a committee could be very helpful to the codification staff of -the Bureau, <br />and should, upon appointment, meet with the staff to determine the ~best method of proceeding to <br />accomplish its purpose. <br /> <br />The question was called on the motion, and the motion as stated carried unanimously. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 8698 - Readopt Section XVI, Ordinance No. 10691 City Code. (Fencing certain <br />business operations) was submitted and read the first time in full on February 3, 1969, and lacking <br />unanimous consent on second reading by council bill number only, was held over to this meeting for <br />further consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be read the third time by council bill <br />number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was <br />read the third time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall <br />vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 15532. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 8725 - Creating an Airport Commission was submitted and read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by <br />only, with unanimous consent. <br />by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy that the bill be read the second time by council bill number <br />Motion carried unanimously and the bill was reaa the second time <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the rules be suspended and <br />time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the CounciL <br />and the bill was read the third time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />the bill read the third <br />Motion carried unanimously, <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall <br />vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 15933. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 8726 - Amending Sections 28.40 and 28.41 Code of the City of Eugene 1955 <br />Providing Penalties and Declaring an Emergency (Providing for temporary stops in bus zones and <br />parking of two wheel vehicles in certain areas) was submitted and read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be read the second time by council bill number <br /> <br />2/10/69 - 8 <br /> <br />..... <br />