|
<br />0166
<br />
<br />5/12/69
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />.... 'I
<br />!I
<br /> II
<br /> ,I
<br /> 'i
<br /> ii
<br /> ;1
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> i!
<br />
<br />e. EmerEu1Jd" BasebalLCliib - A letter has been received regarding parking requireme~ts for
<br />the Emerald Baseball Club. To comply with requirements of the Building Dep~rtment,
<br />a variance to, exceed permissable parking requirements arid to 'allow 'full ,use of the J
<br />stands, has been requested for the game to be played on June'9.
<br />. .
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov to grant a Variance for the Emerald
<br />Baseball Club to allow full use of the stands and to waive parking requirements
<br />on June 9. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />..A vote was taken on the motion as stated..
<br />
<br />Motion carried.
<br />
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />i
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />
<br />behalf of the Council support- III,'
<br />Council had gone on record
<br />/:
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />il
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />I'
<br />'j
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />it
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />d
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />)
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />'IJ
<br />!:
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve Item Ie of the Committee report.
<br />carried.
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />
<br />'I
<br />!!
<br />I,
<br />:1
<br />,j:
<br />q
<br />..1:
<br />
<br />In answer to a question from Mr. Teague the Manag~r said when a building permit was requested for
<br />improvement of civic stadium, the request included addition of a number on seats. The Building
<br />Code required there be a certain number of off-street parking spaces per seat in the stadium. Be-
<br />..cause of the shortage of, off-street parking spaces, ~ an~L.~~~ f~ct that the old stadium had been in
<br />this location before adoption of the new zoning ordinance-; "the interpretation was" that the require-
<br />ments would only have to be met by the new building. This could be accomplished by cordoning off
<br />existing stands. They have requested a waiver to t~is requirement for the night of June 9, since
<br />an overflow crowd is anticip?ted at that time.
<br />
<br />f.
<br />
<br />Underground Wiring Bill -,The Manager sent a telegram on
<br />ing amendments to the underground wiring bill, since the
<br />as supporting these amendments.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that Item If of the Committee report be received and
<br />placed on file. 'Motion carrieq.
<br />
<br />2.
<br />
<br />Bids, Public Works pro;ects - The Director of Public Works has analyzed the unit bid
<br />prices relating to 1969 paving contracts. A normal increase of 2% per year was "experienced
<br />on paving projects, and since this is nominal, it may explain the added costs of approx-
<br />imately 15% and 20% being attributed to the fricr'e"ase'dc'ostof const'ruction by the cont-
<br />ractor.
<br />
<br />Mr. Allen explained the bids, stating that No.1, Capitol Drive, had been entirely ini-
<br />,tiated by the City, and since owners had expressed a feeling that the estimated assess-
<br />ment was too high, it is anticipated they will object to the new prices, under the low
<br />bid. The other projects ar~ subdivision projects, and .Public Works Department recommends
<br />the low bid in each case, subject to the approval of the subdivider and signing of a
<br />contractual agreement that he will accept the project assessments.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to award the contract to the low bidder in each
<br />of these six projects., Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Copies of the bid tabulation covering paving and sewer projects were distributed"to Council members,
<br />at the Committee meeting.
<br />
<br />Becaus'e'of the _h~g~,cps.t" o.:t~: bids on these items,
<br />Works'Department has rec'eived many phone calls.
<br />the reasons' for high bids.
<br />
<br />affected property owners were contacted. Public
<br />Public Works Director explained the project and
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to award the bid to the low bidder in each of the three
<br />schedules, of item 1.
<br />
<br />,I
<br />~ !
<br />
<br />II
<br />:'
<br />ii
<br />II
<br />il
<br />\i
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />II
<br />il
<br />il
<br />I'
<br />Mr. Lou Farnsworth, 2480 Malabar Drive, questioned the Direct~r of Public Works concerning retain- - il
<br />ing walls, and whether the city or the property~'owner w,ould be responsible for payment for construc- Ii
<br />tion of any required. The Director of Public Works said none were planned for that area, but if I!
<br />they were necessary, the property owner had the responsibility to pay the cost. ii
<br />
<br />:i
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />ii
<br />11
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />:1
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />"
<br />
<br />Mr. John Cook, 2830 Capitol Drive, objected to this bid, saying he would have,a double assessment,
<br />since he had a double-frontage lot. He suggested that the street continue with an asphalt apron,
<br />and delete curbs and sidewalks. Mr. Allen explained the reason for city specifications, especially
<br />in areas such as this with steep grades. Mr. Coo~ said his driveway would be ruin~d with a 20'
<br />wide street, and Mr. Allen said they would"try to work this out.
<br />
<br />Mis Kenar Charkoudian, 2503 Capitol Drive, asked that the Council not postpone action on this
<br />project any longer. She said the street is in very bad'condition, and should be improved.
<br />
<br />A vote was taken on the motion as stated.
<br />
<br />Rollca 11 vote.
<br />
<br />Motion carried with Mr. Mohr voting No.
<br />
<br />..
<br />II
<br />
<br />On bids on Items 2, 3, 4~ 5 and 6, Mr. Allen reconunended award
<br />subject to receiving the contractual agreement required of the
<br />of both paving and sanitary and storm sewer. The Public Works
<br />No.4 for Churchill ,Highlands, the agreement received had been
<br />that the.Council not accept.it.
<br />
<br />of all projects'to low bidder,
<br />subdividers accepting assessments
<br />Director explained that, on Bid
<br />altered, and he would reconunend
<br />
<br />"
<br />I
<br />,.
<br />'I'
<br />"
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mrs'. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald th<;1t the contracts be awarded to the low bidders in
<br />each of these five projects, subject to receipt of proper contractual agreements.
<br />
<br />Mr. Duane Pin~erton, 1653 Walnut, ~ttorney represen~kng owners of property in Project No.4, gave
<br />.
<br />
<br />~,
<br />
<br />5/12/69 - 3
<br />
<br />-I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|