<br />e
<br />
<br />"'IIIl
<br />
<br />i8
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />-I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />.e
<br />
<br />r
<br />(
<br />11
<br />Ii
<br />.1
<br />I;
<br />I:
<br />I; Adjourned meeting of the Common Council of the city of Eugene, Oregon was adjourned from the meeting
<br />:i of February 23, 1970 and called to order by His Honor Mayor Lester E. Anderson at 7:30 p.m. on I'
<br />I: February 24, 1970 in the McNutt Room of City Hall, wi t.h the following councilmen present: Mr. McDonald'~
<br />il Dr. Purdy, Mr. Williams, Mrs. Hayward and Mr. Mohr; Councilmen BeaI, Teague and Gribskov were absent.
<br />
<br />
<br />I,
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />I.
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />ii
<br />Ii
<br />i ~
<br />i:
<br />It
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />I;
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />ii
<br />i!
<br />I;
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />['
<br />iI
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />McNutt -Room
<br />Eugene, Oregon
<br />February 24, 1970
<br />
<br />Members of the Employe Relations Committee present were, Chairman, Robert Fraser, Attorney; Eaton
<br />Conant, Assistant Director of Institulion of Industrial and Labor RelatiDBs, University ?f Oregon;
<br />Kenneth Tollenaar, Director, Bureau of Governmental Research, University of Oregon; John Boyer,
<br />Association of General Contractors. S. T. Ford, Assistant Director of Oregon Civil Service Commission
<br />was absent.
<br />
<br />1.
<br />
<br />Initiative Petitions ~ The City Recorder reported that
<br />signatures on petitions circulated by the Future Power
<br />place the matter on the ballot.
<br />
<br />the City had, received 4640 certified
<br />Committee. This is sufficient to
<br />
<br />Council Bill No. 9097 - Ordering a special election for purpose of submitting to electors
<br />of City on May 26, 1970, concurrently with regular primary election for Lane County and State of Oregon
<br />amendments to the Charter of the city of Eugene proposed by initiative petition of the Electors, and
<br />adopting the polling places and using the clerks provided and appointed by Lane County for said
<br />election, and providing for all acts necessary for carrying on of said election, and declaring an.
<br />emergency was submitted and read in full.
<br />
<br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded
<br />only with unanimous consent
<br />second time by council bill
<br />
<br />by Dr. Purdy that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br />of the Council. 'Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the
<br />number only.
<br />
<br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded
<br />by council bill number only.
<br />council bill number only.
<br />
<br />by Dr. Purdy that the rules be suspended and the bill read the third time
<br />Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the third time by
<br />
<br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 15890.
<br />
<br />The City Attorney explained that the City Council has thirty days to take action on an initiative
<br />measure to put it on the ballot. Without this action, the measure would not go on the ballot for this
<br />election. In answer to Dr. Purdy's question, the City Attorney said it would be necessary to ~ass
<br />anotner ordinance if the firemen submit a petition for charter amendment.
<br />
<br />2.
<br />
<br />Anderson explained that
<br />which would assist the
<br />The Committee had asked
<br />
<br />Report, Advisory Committee on Emplqyer-Employe Relations - Mayor
<br />this committee had been appointed some time ago to report facts
<br />Council to make decisions regarding employer-employe relations.
<br />to meet to exchange ideas and present an interim report.
<br />
<br />,
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />I:
<br />I,
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />.,
<br />
<br />
<br />I:
<br />
<br />I'
<br />I:
<br />I'
<br />"
<br />II
<br />!i
<br />
<br />Mr. Robert Fraser, Chairman of the committee, said they had requested this meeting to
<br />report to the Council and perhaps put in perspective their thinking, and get clarifi-
<br />cation, particularly of the language of the Council which asked that the committee not
<br />make specific recommendations. The report submitted by the Committee was intended to
<br />be a foundation for discussion between the Council and the committee. Mr. Fraser read
<br />the report, which recommended that the City declare itself a "public employer" to bring
<br />itself under the State Public Employes Relations Board employe relations system. (PERB)
<br />The PERB could assist in determining which empl~ye groups would be formally recognized
<br />by the City,in fact finding and mediation if negotiations reached an impasse. The
<br />committee recommended procedures to combine new city rules with PERB rules. It antici-
<br />pated that a local ordinance would be enacted allowing for a procedural meshing and
<br />ultimate resolution of the impasse procedure. Consideration should be given to:
<br />
<br />a. Exchange of information on initial positions some weeks prior to opening
<br />negotiations. These negotiations should begin several months prior to
<br />deadline for resolutions in the City Budget.
<br />b. If either party declares that negotiations are deaalocked within an
<br />appropriate pe~iod of time, PERB would be asked to assist. A mediation
<br />committee could be appointed, which would mnclude one private citizen
<br />from Lane County. The committee could make non-binding recommendations
<br />for settlement to parties. It could arbitrate the dispute and return a
<br />decision before the end of two weeks. This decision would be binding
<br />upon the City Manager and the employe bargaining agent. However, it would
<br />not be binding upon the City Council.
<br />
<br />At that juncture the ~ouncil would have the option of accepting or rejecting the arbitratmDs
<br />decision on a yes or no basis. It would not have the option of approving or rejecting a de-
<br />cision in part, unless the arbitrator requested the city council to make such/appropriate
<br />decisions.
<br />
<br />The Committee requested that (a) The Council adopt "in principle9 the interim report
<br />with instructions to the committee to formalize its recommendations; (b) the City
<br />Attorney or his staff be instructed'to provide drafting assistance and such further
<br />legal assistance as might be required by the committee; (c) in event City Council
<br />adopted the report in principle, the Council should go on record as opposed to the
<br />
<br />present charter amendment proposed by the Eugene Firefighters Association, as an
<br />
<br />2/24/70 - 1
<br />
<br />...
<br />
|