<br />r'
<br />
<br />151
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I,
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />Council Chamber
<br />Eugene, Ope.gon
<br />May-li, 1970
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Regular meeting of the Common Council of the city of
<br />Lester E. Anderson at 7: 30 p. m. on. May 11, 1970 ,q in
<br />Councilmen present: Mr. McDonald; Mrs. Hayward; Dr.
<br />and Gribskov were absent.
<br />
<br />Minutes of meetings held April 13 and April 20, 1970, as mailed to Council members, were approved.
<br />
<br />Eugene, Oregon was called to order by His Honor
<br />the Council Chamber, with the fol~o~ing
<br />Purdy; Mrs. Beal; Mr. Mohr.. Teague, W~lliams
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,i
<br />il
<br />'I
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />11
<br />il
<br />il
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />11
<br />
<br />Public Hearing, Employe Relations Ordinance - Copies of the proposed ordinance were distributed
<br />at the committee of the whole meeting, and copies of proposed amendments were distributed at this
<br />meeting. On Page 4 a suggested Section 6c has been proposed which would provide that all expenses
<br />of the impasse committee should be shared evenly by the City and the labor organization, and on
<br />Page 5 a new Section 8 has been suggested, which was recommended by the City Manager to remove
<br />ambiguity. Section 9 has been written to prevent the City Attorn~y's ,office from having to bring
<br />suit against the City Manager's office. The new section provides for a method of enforcement, and
<br />is recommendeq by the committee in its present form. Section 10, standard severability clause,
<br />has been added.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Mr. Fraiser, chairman of the Mayor's Committee, commented that the committee was concerned about a
<br />sharing of expenses provision. Throughout the work on the ordinance th~ committee was conscious
<br />of the fact the bargaining representative might not be organized labor, and that the employe might
<br />be forced to go to a union for funds. Otherwise, they were in favor of the amendments.r
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr requested that Council Bill 9152 (Vacation of 13th Avenue), be discussed before
<br />completing this testimony, since there were many perSGns present on this item.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />City Manager said the public hearing had been held on closure of 13th Avenue, and that the Council
<br />wuld vote again tonight on the reading of the Ordinance.
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr 'moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that the Council consider the third reading of Council
<br />Bi,ll No. 9152.
<br />
<br />Councilman Purdy was concerned that the Council had not finished the hearing on the collective
<br />bargaining ordinance, and felt this should be continued before entering into another item.
<br />
<br />-Mrs. Hayward clarified what Council action would be on this item. She too felt it should have been
<br />handled in the proper place, but as long as the Council was into it, they could handle it now.
<br />
<br />Vote taken on motion to take out of order. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />,I
<br />il
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />il
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />11
<br />II
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />)1
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />!l
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />I'
<br />
<br />:1
<br />Ii
<br />11
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />"
<br />"
<br />i!
<br />
<br />Ci ty Manager read Council Bill No. 9152, ,calling, pub1i.-.c hearing June, 1970 re: Vacation of 13th
<br />Avenue East between Alder Street and Agate Street: the-second time. This bill was submitted and
<br />read in full the first time at the meeting of May 4, 1970, and held over upon failure to receive
<br />unanimous approval for second reading at that meeting.
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward,that the bill be read the third time by council bill number
<br />only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Mr. McDonald was opposed so the bill will be brought
<br />back for third reading at the next Council meeting.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />The City Manager reported that the Planning Commission had met with the University Planning
<br />personnel at noon, and that a joint meeting with the Planning Commission, City Council and Univers-
<br />ity personnel has been suggested for Monday, May 18 at noon. Council consensus was that this
<br />time would be satisfactory for such a meeting.
<br />
<br />Employe Relations Ordinance, Continuation - Mr. Conant said sharing equally in cost of impasse
<br />procedure would appear."to be equitable, but in this setting, employe groups will not have volun-
<br />tary participation to agree to and draw up ppovisions. Small employe organizations may not have
<br />resources, and would have to join a national organization to be able to share in expense of
<br />impasse procedures.
<br />
<br />--
<br />
<br />City Manager asked if the committee would object if, in the section pertaining to local represen-
<br />tation on the impasse committee, the words "at least" were added. Also,,,it is suggested dead-
<br />line dates be moved back one month to give more time for the various procedures.
<br />
<br />Mr. Fraser said the committee would have no objection to these changes.
<br />
<br />Mr. John Rowley, President of Eugene Police Benevolent Association, said he was not sure whether
<br />he was speaking for or against the ordinance. He asked if the ordinance wuld allow a contract
<br />or working agreement to be written between the Police Benevolent Assocation and the City which
<br />could be renegotiated each year. The City Manager said the Public Employe Relations Board would
<br />designate bargaining units.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />In answer to Mr. Rowley's question concerning fringe benefits, Manager said these could be part of
<br />the contract. On binding arbitration the City Council would have veto power.
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson pointed out one of the features of this ordinance was that it allowed flexibility
<br />in collective bargaining, and gave the opportunity to make changes as found necessary.
<br />
<br />Mr. rraser pointed out that, regarding a labor contract, Public Employe Relations Board would hold
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />5/11/70 - 1
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />an election to establish each bargaining unit.
<br />
|