06/22/1970 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

"... I 2- / 7 e 6/22/70 I 4./ Social Survey in Neighborhood Development Area - A requirement of the Neighborhood I I Development Project is a socia-economic survey in the area. It has been proposed that the city staff work under contract with the Eugene Renewal Agency. The Planning Director explained that besides relocation and housing assistance, assis,;hance is needed with economic and social problems. $7,000 has been budgeted for the project. I i Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to authorize the staff to enter into contract with the II II Eugene Renewal Agency regarding a socio-economic survey in the Danebo Neighborhood Development I Proj ect, for the amount of $7,000. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the motion I t carried. I I 'I 5. Transfer of EWEB property to Lane County - Property was purchased jointly by EWEB I, and the County for highway and transmission line. Certain parcels should now be I, transferred to Lane County. ,: I ,I Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov to adopt a resolution deeding certain e II real property to Lane County. Motion carried. Ii Mr. Teague moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to approve Item 5 of the Committee report. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the motion carried. I t 6. Planning Commission Report of June 2 - The Planning Commission has recommended acchange I of the sign code district boundaries to include both sides of 11th Avenue between Mill I II Street and theaalley east of Ferry Street in the Outlying Commercial District. This II will permit signing in primarily commercial areas. II A hearing will be called for Monday, June 22, 1970 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. l' d The City Manager read the description of the area the Commission has proposed to change, because [' uses of property are commercial, and as property changed hands could not put up signs because this is designated as a residential area in the sign code. The Planning Commission 'proposes to change this , I area to an outlying commercial district, which will permit signing. !I Mr. Teague moved sec9nded by Dr. Purdy to approve the recommendation of the Planning Commission II regarding the change of the sign code district boundaries. Motion carried. II 7. Segregation of Assessment - Kenneth D. Gilbert, 1189 Fairfield Street - Total Assessment I, $15,559.45 Amount to be segregated from Tax Lot 1900, $4005.96. I, Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve the segregation of assessment for II K.D. Gilbert at 1189 Fairfield Street. Motion carried. II Mr. Teague moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to approve Item 7 of the Committee report. Rollcall vote. Ii All councilmen present voting aye, the motion carried. ;1 8. Option to Purchase, Norkenzie Road Right of Way - Russell E. Donovan, 2293 Norkenzie, II $ 300 .00 . Authorization is required to exercise option. I II il II Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to authorize the purchase of the right of way II from Russell E. Donovan, 2293 Norkenzie for $300.00. Motion carried. 'I I' II Mr. Teague moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to approve Item 8 of the Committee report. Rollcall vote. /' All councilmen present voting aye, the motion carried. II ,I II 9. City Symbol - In past years many city symbols have been proposed, and agreement has -- never been reached. The Parks Department has proposed a symbol which would be easily .. ,I II readable. I' II 'I The Council consensus was that the design was pleasing, and that it should be up to the II City Manager and his staff to decide suitable symbols, and their use. " 10. Transfer of County Roads to City Jurisdiction - By resolution the City will assume i, Ii jurisdiction of county roads now in the City by virtue of annexation. The maj ority II are roads included in the Crest Heights Annexation. One is in the Norkenzie area which was never assumed by the City. Ii No action taken. I 11. Requirement of Apartment House Developers to Assume Costs of Alley Pavement - From a City Attorney opinion it would appear that a charter amendment would be necessary I to require apartment house developers to assume the entire cost of an alleys shared I ~ I 'I by residential lots. Mayor Anderson recommended that no action be taken which would II involve a charter revision for this issue. , Ii The question was raised whether a new rule could be adopted which would require a .I different percentage of property owners to petition. It was pointed out that the il Council may change this. il II e i' !; ~ " 6/22/70 - 10 I ~' L