My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/31/1970 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1970
>
08/31/1970 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 12:12:37 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:05:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/31/1970
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ I <br />'JZ."f(j.,.:?~ - <br />----~~\~ ., <br /> <br />8/31/70 <br />- . . . <br />- - <br />.. .... <br />~~.,- - - -~..- - - -.- <br /> <br />r ~ 1 <br /> <br />I Council Bill No. 9257 - Amending Eugene Sign Code Section 6 (billboards) was submitted and I <br />I read in full. <br /> <br />I Mr. Gleaves urged that the third reading not be given this bill, since the Council had previously . <br />I adopted a motion which affirmed their belief that the ordinance did not allow billboards in the 15' <br />setback area. If the City Attorney had construed the meaning correctly, this amendment would do <br />nothing. Mr. Gleaves urged that the appeals po~tion be amended to allow an overall appeal so that <br />I the entire sixty-two nonconforming signs could be dealt with at one time. This would be less <br />time-consuming and less expensive. <br /> <br />I Councilwoman Hayward asked if it was Mr. Gleaves opini~n the wording did not' change the intent of <br />the ordinance. Mr. Gleaves said it did not. That the Council had previously adopted a motion <br />II which is an indicati::on to staff of Council thinking as to how the ordinance should be interpreted. <br />II In Mr. Gleaves opinion the amendment would add problems. He did not believe the ordinance said <br />what the Council believed, but the amendment would do nothing to alter what it said. <br /> <br />I In answer to Mr. Mohr, Mr. Gleaves said his proposal would not require appeals. If an existing sign <br />created no problems, let it stand. If a complaint was made on a particular sign, a decision could 4It <br />be made through the hearing process. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson could see no reason to refrain from updating the ordinance to take care of an admin- <br />I istrative problem. <br />I <br /> <br />I Mr. Gleaves was concerned there would be a greater emphasis on getting compliance. <br /> <br />II I <br />I' <br />I Vote taken on sign amendment. " '. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the bill be read the second time by council bill <br />I number, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read <br />I the second time by council bill number OnlY.,. _' . _ ~ ~ < _, ~ ~ <br /> <br />I Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Teague that ~he rules be suspended andthe,'-tTill read the third <br />I time by council bill number only. All voted in'''i'avor e.xceflt-~Mri.''Teague who was opposed. The bill <br />II was held. <br /> <br />I Mrs. Hayward moved request Planning Commission to consider appeals procedure in sign ordinance and <br />consider the proposal of Obie Sign Company made at this meeting, and report back to the Council a <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />I Dr. Purdy seconded with the provision the Planning Commission consider class appeals or group <br />appeals. The Planning Director said the Planning Commission would hold a public hearing on this <br />matter at its meeting of October. <br /> <br />Mr. Leonard Frojen appealed to the Council to refrain from tampering with the appeal section of the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Vote taken on motion as stated. Motion carried. <br /> <br />RESOLUTIONS I <br /> <br />Res. No. 1851 - Granting permit to R. N. Taylor for trailer for night watchman at 1165 Ocean <br />Avenue was submitted and read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 1852 - Making application for certain traffic signal construction under Urban <br />Traffic Operations Program was submitted and read i~ full. ~ <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried. <br /> <br />I' Resolution No. 1853 - Urging support of Oregon Congressional District for Federal Revenue <br />Sharing program with local governments~ was submitted and read in full. <br /> <br />I Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 1854 - Urging congressional support of federal grants for urban mass transit <br />facilities was submitted and read in 'full. <br /> <br />Mr. McDon~ld moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Resolution No~ 1855 - Transmitting to Planning Commission request for amendment of zoning <br />ordinance and calling public hearing September.l, 1970 at 7: 30 p.m. was submitted and read in full -- <br /> <br />! Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried. III <br /> <br />II Resolution No. 1856 - Initiating minor boundary change for annexation to the city of Eugene and <br />I transmitting to the Boundary Commission (Ogle) was submitted and read in full. <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Mcdonald moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the resolut~on be adopted. Motion carried. <br /> <br />\ Resolution No. l857 - Calling public hearing re: barricading south end of Old County Road ~ <br />l running diagonally from Country Club Road to Coburg Road was submitted and read in full. ,., <br />I. . <br />1\ 8/31/70 - 21 : <br />~ :! ~ <br /> <br />L -----" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.