My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 08/11/08 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:27:37 PM
Creation date
8/8/2008 9:59:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in addition to just the pavement. She said the River Road area was interested in good roads, no sidewalks <br />and preserving bioswales. She hoped that the City’s policies could be examined for the purpose of allowing <br />some flexibility to tailor improvements to a neighborhood’s wishes. Mr. Ruiz said the subcommittee would <br />be useful to address those types of policy questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor determined that there was agreement among councilors to re-establish a subcommittee on <br />transportation system funding. Ms. Solomon, Mr. Clark, Ms. Taylor and Ms. Bettman volunteered to be on <br />the subcommittee. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark said the City’s policies driving infill and increased density had created some of the problems by <br />taking unimproved roads and forcing increased capacity onto them without paying for it. He said Bond <br />Lane was an excellent example; side streets and cul-de-sacs had increased the number of houses and the City <br />as a whole bore the responsibility for what increasing density had done to Bond Lane. He was troubled by <br />the issues of Crest Drive and questioned why the City’s share of only that project might be included in the <br />bond measure. He hoped the subcommittee would address those equity issues. He agreed with Ms. Ortiz’s <br />comments regarding design concerns in River Road. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said she could not support including improvements to unimproved streets in the CIP because <br />that was a caveat that would force people on those streets to pay assessments without any say in the matter. <br />She said creating travelshed LIDs should apply to new subdivisions and traffic impact analyses should take <br />into consideration the cumulative impact on access streets. She pointed out that half of the unimproved <br />streets were accepted as transfers from the County, which had over $40 million in a Road Fund reserve. She <br />said the City should request some of those funds to offset the obligation it assumed with those roads. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said the reason for doing the Crest Drive, Storey Boulevard, and Friendly Street project first was <br />because they had been working on the design issue for years. She commented that some people in River <br />Road area were pleased that the Crest Drive design project was setting a precedent. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Jon Ruiz <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Lynn Taylor) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 23, 2008 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.