My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Minor Code Amendments and Land Use Regulations
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 08/11/08 Meeting
>
Item 3: Minor Code Amendments and Land Use Regulations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:43:33 PM
Creation date
8/8/2008 10:40:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and zoned as nodal areas for purposes of the 2015 performance measure. The transition requirement <br />applies only to the R-3 Limited High Density Residential and R-4 High Density Residential zoned land <br />just south of the University, within the area bound by Hilyard Street to the west, Agate Street to the <br />east, E. 18th Avenue to the north and E. 20th Avenue to the south. Further, the building heights in the <br />R-3 and R-4 zones would be restricted to 35 feet only for that portion of a building located within 160 <br />feet from the abutting boundary of, or directly across an alley from, land zoned R-1, and building <br />heights in the R-4 zone would be restricted to 50 feet only for that portion of a building located within <br />175 feet of land zoned R-3, and to 75 feet for a portion of a building greater than 175 feet and up to <br />225 feet from land zoned R-3. DLCD has not identified a basis for concluding that the proposed <br />height transitions will unlawfully interfere with the region’s ability to meet its 23.3% performance <br />standard and the City finds no such basis. Further, the City finds that the modest parking requirements <br />are necessary to address excessive demand for on-street parking resulting from the increase in multi- <br />family developments in the area and finds that the requirements do not conflict with any nodal policy, <br />standard or criterion. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.