|
<br />"Ill
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />1-5~
<br />
<br />1/11/71
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />1\
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />11
<br />Ii
<br />i,
<br />,I
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />
<br />with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the third
<br />time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />ij
<br />I,
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. 'Rollcall vot1i.
<br />All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16132.
<br />
<br />COUNCIL BILL NO. 9328 - Amending Section 1.14 entitled "Reading of ordinance prior to final
<br />passage" contained in the code of the city of Eugene, as amended, was submitted and read in full
<br />the first time on December 28, 1970, and upon failure to receive unanimous consent for second reading,
<br />is brought back at this time for further consideration.
<br />
<br />'I
<br />1 ~
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. ,Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br />only. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bfull be read the third time by council bill number only
<br />wi th unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the tIii"rd"
<br />time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be pp~roved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16123.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />COUNCIL BILL NO. 9329 - Amending Section 2.1 of the Code relating to conditions required in
<br />labor contracts excecuted by the city of Eugene was submitted and read in full the first time on
<br />December 28, 1970, and upon failure to receive unanimous consent for second reading, is brought back
<br />at this time for further consideration.
<br />
<br />Mr., Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br />only. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the third time by council bill number only~
<br />wi th unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the third 'i
<br />time by council bill number only.
<br />,', .
<br />k,
<br />
<br />';
<br />c,
<br />I:.
<br />
<br />. . . . --
<br />The Assistanf'dity 'Manager' explained the bill, how>' it originated, and what the Council hoped. to'
<br />clCcomplis,h ,.in, n=lation, ~to the contractor' and workmen ;
<br />
<br />"
<br />"
<br />"
<br />
<br />:1
<br />Mr. Ken Bylund, Lane County Labor Council, asked for clarification, and said he could see no reason for
<br />"
<br />the ordinance to be passed.
<br />
<br />The Assistant City Manager explained that there had been a problem concerning payment of wages. This
<br />ordinance would not set aside the state law, but would give the Council remedies in the e~~~t a
<br />contractor failed to perform his obligations.
<br />
<br />Mr. Bylund felt the Council was evading its responsibility. He voiced concern that the ordinance
<br />might create a hardship for workers. He felt there was a need for enforcement, rather than an
<br />additional law.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />The City Attorney said the City complies completely with the laws of the State regarding payment of
<br />minimum wages. He explained the basis for the ordinance and that the ordinance makes certain condi-
<br />tions specific, especially regarding violations regarding payment of wages and equal opportunity.
<br />
<br />Coqncilman Williams was concerned that the rights of individuals might be wornged, and felt that
<br />there were already adequate statutes. He felt that, not only the contractor would be put out of
<br />business, but the employe would also be put out of business.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr said the City was trying to accomplish something other than what he had suggested shou'ld
<br />be accomplished, and that another layer of penalty would be added to State law. He noted that this
<br />ordinance would not directly help the workman, as did the Human Rights Ordina~ce, by having the
<br />City Attorney prosecute the workman's case.
<br />
<br />Councilman Hershner was concerned that the penalty appeared to be mandatory. For the City to have an
<br />option to review, the ordinance would need amendment.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16124.
<br />
<br />COUNCIL BILL NO. 9334 - Amending sections of Eugene Ordinance pertaining to licensing of
<br />dogs, to bring into conformance with County ordinance, was submitted and read in full.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bilili number
<br />onlv, with unanimous consent of the Council. Mo~'Hon carried unanimously and the bill was read the
<br />sec~nd time by council bill number only. '
<br />
<br />~ - - ....
<br />Siilte'there- wa~ s01!le qtie;ti~n reg~rding. se~tions- of this orq,~';1ance, the City, Attorney
<br />he"Y;edraft it ,an(f'submit it at. ,the:-next'-meetihg. Council consensus was that all would
<br />. wn'l~,soll!~'. ch~~ve~;":-Th~-~b,ipwill.~be 's~mitt~d at the next regGlar Gouncil meeting.
<br />
<br />suggest.ed'that
<br />be' happier'
<br />
<br />.,' I'
<br />
<br />.~ eOJ:JN9lL BILL NO. 9335 -~Accepting'--'jurisdiction'~oy~r ,certain. CouT1.t.~.roads now, ~o.g.at,ea._wi:thin !\
<br />:dorporate Ilmits~f the. city oLEugene~ ~s,ubffii~t'-e-d - and: r,~ad in full. . " "
<br />. .~. .~ '.~.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved see ~ded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by ccouncil bill number
<br />only~ with unanimous consent of tbe Council. Motion -carried unanimously and the bill was read the
<br />
<br />1-11-71 -13
<br />
<br />...,j
<br />
|