|
<br />e
<br />
<br />""III
<br />
<br />SOG
<br />
<br />3/8/71
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />, Ii
<br />I:
<br />I
<br />,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />:1
<br />I
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />U
<br />Ii
<br />I!
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I,
<br />I ~
<br />
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />Councilman McDonald said he felt this was a good project ~ and that the Planning Commission had
<br />assured the Council that it would be a wellpplanned development. Mr. McDonald expressed concern
<br />that persons with incomes under $3,000 shouilidbeprovided for. _ Mrs. Smith explained that the
<br />income limit was $~,OOO,_but 20% of the units could be rented..underrent supplement. In these
<br />cases, persons would pay only 25% of their income -in rent.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague was concerned over neighborhood feeling, and said that, in correspondence he had
<br />received, those in favor were not members of the neighborhood.
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr moved secorred by Mrs. Campbell that the appeal be denied based upon consideration of
<br />the presentation of all witnesses and persons who appeared and spoke for and against the proposal
<br />at the Planning Commission meetings of December 1, 1970 and February 2, 1971, as appears in the
<br />minutes of these meetings furnished to the City Council and based upon the information submitted
<br />to the City Council this evening, both by proponents and opponents to the application for a
<br />Planned Unit Development, the City ~uncil finds and determines that the proposal-conforms
<br />to the applicable criteria and standards of Ordinance #15158, and approves all the findings and
<br />the action of the Planning Commission granting preliminary approval to the PACT Action for
<br />Development of Planned Unit Development as shown on Page 25 of the minutes of the Planning
<br />Commission of its meeting of February 1, 1971. '
<br />
<br />Messrs Teague Gribskov and McDonald voted against the motion. Mr. Mohr, Mr. Williams and
<br />Mrs. Campbell voted in favor. The tie was broken by Mayor Anderson, who voted in favor. Motion
<br />carried.
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson explained that Eugene has long been dedicated to a housing policy spelled out by
<br />a resolution adopted by the Council a number of years ago, and it was his feeling this plan, as
<br />presented, was a fulfillment of that policy. He thought judgments of the Planning Commission
<br />were sound, based on arguments presented to them, and that there had been no attempt-to miscon-
<br />strue information or to subtract anything. He believed the project was well-planned, and said
<br />he had high hopes for it. Mayor Anderson was sure the-project would work, because of the nature
<br />of the opposition. This was a neighborhood with a ,lot of pride, and presented with the real
<br />challenge of making the housing policy of the city work, he thought they could do so. This has
<br />been a difficult decision, and the Council hopes that the people recognize that it was done
<br />for what the Council feels is the best for our City.
<br />
<br />A short break was taken.
<br />
<br />III. Assessment Ordinances, Public Hearing
<br />
<br />COUNCIL BILL NO. 9353 - Levying assessments for sanitary sewer in area bounded by 28th
<br />Avenue on the north, Lincoln Street (extended) on the east, 160' south of that portimof Crest
<br />Drive (extended) which lies on the south line of the NW~ of Section 7 Twnship 18 South, Range
<br />4 West, WM, on the south and 400' west of the north/sourfuhportion of Ingalls Way extended on the
<br />west, was submitted and read in full the first time on February 8, 1971, held over to this
<br />meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties, and
<br />brought back for consideration with two written protests on file.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill
<br />number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously
<br />
<br />A letter of protest was received from Phyllis G. Wald, 2973 Portland, in which she maintained
<br />that the sewer was not close enought to her property to ever be of use. Dr. Schellman
<br />requested a deferred assessment, but his property does not meet the criteria, since part of
<br />the lot has frontage on an existing dedicated street.
<br />
<br />An administrative public hearing was held in the City Hall Council Chambers on March 1, 1971
<br />at 7:30 p.m. All involved owners were given notice of the meeting and notice of the- proposed
<br />assessment.
<br />
<br />Three requests were received f~D deferment of assessment, and it is the staff recommendation
<br />that this privilege be extended. They are:
<br />
<br />Mr., Bushey - $1,842.50
<br />Mrs. Davis - 1,842.50
<br />Mr. Guse 921.25
<br />
<br />Tax Lot 7400 18-04-01-4-4
<br />Tax Lot 7200 & 7300 18-04-01-4-4
<br />Tax Lot 7400 18-04-01~4-4
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. All councilmeB ppesent voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16168.
<br />
<br />COUNCIL BILL NO. 9354 - Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer and storm sewer
<br />within 2nd addition to Churchill Highlands was submitted and read in full the first time on
<br />February 8, 1971, held over to this meeting to allow proper notice of~assessment to be given
<br />owners of affected properties, and is brought back for consideration with no written protests
<br />on file.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill
<br />number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unaimously and the bill
<br />was read the second time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />3/8/71 - 5
<br />
<br />...
<br />
|