|
<br />r .s':)~
<br />
<br />5/24/71
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> Ii
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> I:
<br /> II
<br /> 'i
<br /> I,
<br /> Ii
<br /> I:
<br /> ,I
<br /> 11
<br /> Ii
<br /> "
<br /> II
<br /> "
<br /> ii
<br /> I:
<br /> I,
<br /> I'
<br /> ! I~
<br /> Ii
<br /> 'I
<br /> "
<br /> I.
<br /> "
<br /> I!
<br /> ii
<br /> ,
<br /> ii
<br /> Ii
<br /> "
<br /> ,I
<br /> Ii
<br /> :1
<br /> li
<br /> il
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> !I
<br /> I'
<br /> I'
<br /> II
<br /> I'
<br /> ,I
<br /> :i
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> [i
<br /> I
<br /> Ii
<br /> 'I
<br /> II
<br /> i
<br /> I
<br /> ,f
<br /> 'I
<br /> 11
<br /> "
<br /> II
<br /> I ~
<br /> I:
<br /> Ii
<br /> 11
<br /> "
<br /> :j
<br />"
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />"
<br /> I
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I ~
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />11
<br />,:
<br />,I
<br />i'
<br />II
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />Ii
<br />it
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />il
<br />11
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />:1
<br />':
<br />ii
<br />ji
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />\1
<br />I,
<br />i
<br />II
<br />,
<br />~
<br />
<br />In answer to Mrs. Campbell's concerns about financial reimbursement for the disturbances
<br />last year, City Manager informed the Council that HB 2006 is before the Ways and Means
<br />Corrmlittee, and that appropriation of this amount has the support of the Governor's office.
<br />File
<br />
<br />Y.
<br />5/19/71
<br />
<br />Policy re: Use of Tennis Courts - Councilwoman Campbell had received complaints about
<br />priorities in use of the tennis courts, and that none were left free when school classes
<br />were in session.
<br />
<br />Bob Mazany, Administrative Assistant, read the Park's Department directive concerning
<br />such uses, and said the problem sometimes arises from individual teachers not strictly
<br />adhering to the policy. File
<br />
<br />Z.
<br />5/19/71
<br />
<br />Air Pollution Authority, Haze Index - Councilwoman Campbell had received an inquiry
<br />from Mrs. Lois Jackson regarding the haze index, and requesting that it be published
<br />with the weather report in the daily paper. Mrs. Beal explained that instruments used
<br />for this reading had not been established for any length of time in a single location.
<br />They were hoping to cccomplish some type of public notice soon. Mrs. Beal will check
<br />into it. File
<br />
<br />v .- ._.~.
<br />
<br />City Ha~lcDpen House - Councilman Mohr congratulated the city staff for arranging
<br />an open house, and said he judged it had been very successful. He was surprised at
<br />the number of people who attended and the response it got.
<br />
<br />AA.
<br />5/19/71
<br />
<br />File
<br />
<br />BB.
<br />5/19/71
<br />
<br />S.B. 38, Field Burning Bill - Councilwoman Beal attended a hearing of the house supcommittee
<br />on this bi 11 and was very concerned wi th proposed amendments. As it stands, the ci ty
<br />would be better off with no bill at all.
<br />
<br />the tactical approach of the committee, and said
<br />any possibility of legislation this session. This
<br />(See below for comments at regular meeting)
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson was concerned with
<br />there was a real threat of losing
<br />is a must bill for Lane County.
<br />
<br />File
<br />
<br />CC. Court Sui t, Houlegaard vs. Teague et al, in regard to PACT Acti on for Development
<br />PUD application matter.~ City Attorney announced that the City was involved in the
<br />above law suit, and that Mr. Zook was p~:;i,ent to serve papers on individual councilmen.
<br />~ -,--"",,,
<br />
<br />Councilman Hershner asked the City Attorney whether his office would represent the
<br />Council in this sui t. He was assured this would be so.
<br />
<br />File
<br />
<br />Regarding BB. above,Mayor Anderson reported that he had held a press conference with regard
<br />to SB 38, the field burning bill. Amendments have been proposed by Representative Gwinn
<br />which would provide for absolutely no regulation. Attempts are being made through Represen-
<br />tat~ve Nancie Fadeley to nullify these amendments, and to accomplish an orderly phase-out
<br />of burning. The picture at this point is not very bright. '
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal said that the only way the city
<br />good backing for Representative Fadeley.
<br />the bill will be worse than nothing. She
<br />
<br />could possibly have any effect would be to have
<br />If Representative Gwinds amendments are adopted,
<br />asked that people join in the trip to Salem.
<br />
<br />Regarding CC. above, in response to Mr. Mohr the City Attorney explained ab~u~the;hearirig
<br />on a writ of review and that he must provide certified copies of documents .considerea-b1{.
<br />the Planning Commission and Council. Unfortunately, there is no provision in the writ
<br />of review proceedings for taking of additional testimony. He said he was confident the
<br />Court would uphold the Planning Commission recommendation andthe.Clty Gourtcil's affirm-
<br />ation of that decision in the case. '
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to. approve, affirm or file the items listed above, with
<br />the exeeption of Item G which should be 'b\.o,ught to' afl~~h-~r conifnl"tf~e:~:meeting.:'~oikal:l vote.
<br />All councilmen present voting aye, the motion-carried. .- - . ., ':',' - ----
<br />
<br />Minutes of the meeting of April 26, 1971 as circulated, were approved.
<br />
<br />v. Congressional Bills Establishing Noise Limits for Jet Aircraft, Request from Inglewood,
<br />California (Committee meeting of May 19, 1971)
<br />The city of Inglewood California has requested support of , Federal legislation which would
<br />help free communities from aircraft noise pollution.
<br />
<br />Counciwwoman Beal said since she has meetings at the airport, she has a personal interest
<br />and would support the request.
<br />
<br />Councilman Williams said he would support a request for a reduction in aircraft noise
<br />pollution, but he could not specifically support the two federal bills. No action taken.
<br />
<br />Copies of the proposed bills were previously circulated to Councilmen.
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson pointed out that the city of Ing~ewood, California had requested Council
<br />support in securing relief to a very acute problem. He felt the Council should support
<br />them, even though it did not approve of all aspects of the legislation.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the City Council officially support the Resolutions
<br />drafted by the City of Inglewood, California. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />5/24/71 - 9
<br />
<br />i'
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I
<br />;i
<br />I;
<br />I,
<br />'I
<br />!I
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />il
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I
<br />I'
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />,
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />1\
<br />:r
<br />I:
<br />I!
<br />II
<br />;1
<br />II
<br />"
<br />
<br />JI
<br />:i
<br />I
<br />iI
<br />iI
<br />~ I
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />11
<br />ii
<br />!I
<br />!I
<br />il
<br />i'
<br />il
<br />q
<br />I,
<br />iI
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />I,
<br />rI
<br />:1
<br />i:
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />~ !
<br />I,
<br />i:
<br />"
<br />II
<br />"
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />:!
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />^I"
<br />
<br />~ '
<br />
<br />II
<br />i
<br />II
<br />
<br />"
<br />i:
<br />il
<br />r ~
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|