|
<br />r~J5 .
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />6/15/71
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />made mandatory, he would be in favor of it. II I
<br />
<br />,I Vote taken on motion to amend. Mr. McDonald, Mr. Williams and Mr. Teague voted in favor. j
<br />II Messrs. Gribskov, Mohr and Hershner, Mrs. Bea1 and Mrs. Campbell voted against. Motion I[
<br />I failed. II
<br />I,
<br />
<br />Ii Vote taken on main motion to adJpt goals as outlined in interim report of the bicycle I'
<br />I study conmrrttee. Motion carried. I
<br />II t
<br />;! Mayor Anderson t~anked Il}embers ?-ff the co~ ttee for a fine report and said it would I
<br />II be very helpful In worklng out a program In the future. approve
<br />
<br />'I II
<br />ii G. Request for Public Hearing, Mayor's Committee for International Cooperation - The chairman I
<br />,I 6/9/71 of the Committee, Mrs. Ruth Carson, presented a recommendation for a hearing in the !i
<br />ii fall of 1971 on a topic of World Order and Peace. II
<br />
<br />III Mrs. Lois Barton, member of the committee, outlined the committee's projects during il a
<br />I. the year, and reasons for this proposal. The commi ttee has asked that, at the hearing, II ·
<br />II testimony be received from organizational representatives and individuals of the community! III
<br />I '
<br />Iii on world order and peace, and that Senator Fulbrigh,t; and Senators and Representati ves !II
<br />I from Oregon, along with Council members, be invited to preside over the hearings. II
<br />I,
<br />
<br />! Mayor Anderson said he had discussed this with Mrs. Carson and Mrs. Barton and that he II h
<br />! certainly endorsed the program. He suggested endorsement from the Council. il I
<br />
<br />I Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov that the Council endorse the program outlined I
<br />Ii by the Mayor's Conmrrttee for International Cooperation, and that a public hearing he I
<br />II held in the fall. Motion carried. approve I
<br />I II
<br />II '
<br />II H. Relaxation of Restriction, Barking Dogs - Request has been made for liberalization of :1
<br />I 6/9/71 the policy regarding use of _dogs in an industrial zone for protection against burglaries :1
<br />II and prowlers. Mrs. Donald Ridenour submi tted a letter and peti tion signed by residents !I
<br />I of the neighborhood asking consideration of this request. Staff has not written an II
<br />I, ordinance for consideration, but is requesting Council direction whether it is interested II
<br />II . 'I
<br />I In such an amendment. i!
<br />i' :1
<br />I'll Coundilman Mohr suggested a variance might be granted for specific cases. In many II
<br />, parts of industrial zones there are many residences, and this might be a practical i
<br />I sc'ill uti on . ,I
<br />
<br />Ii Manager agreed this might be a solution, but suggested it should be done administrati vely. II
<br />I; :
<br />i Mrs. Ridenour felt something could be worked out,and suggested something might be done II
<br />I about those who teased a watchdog. il
<br />i I
<br />[i Mr. Gribskov agreed with Mr. Mohr's suggestion, and said those with a problem could :
<br />Ii apply for a permi t of some sort. ! .
<br />
<br />, ! I
<br />Ii Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov that the staff prepare a proposed ordinance \1
<br />!',: amendment which would provide for an administrative procedure to issue watchdog permits. II "
<br />II Motion carried. approve I .
<br />il II
<br />Ii There was some discussion whether the relaxation of restriction on barking dogs- would pertain i'l'
<br />Ii to residential areas. It was explained that there are some residences in the industrial ;,
<br />1:1 area, and this was the concern expressed in the minutes. The consideration of allowance of j:
<br />I permi ts had pertained only to industrial zones. Ii It
<br />' I,
<br />II
<br />II I. Fee Schedule, FHA Housing Inspections - A letter was recei ved from Mr. Robert Suess of il
<br />Ii 6/9/71 the Homebuilders Association requesting a change in the inspection fee to $15.00 on ;
<br />II the first dwelling and $10.00 on each unit thereafter, at the same street location. Ii
<br />!I He felt the fee should apply only to previously occupied uni ts. The Building Inspector ,I
<br />:i agreed with the recommendation and an amended resolution will be prepared. :1
<br />Ii "
<br />" 'I
<br />!i Mr. Gribskov moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to authorize staff to prepare aresolution.i
<br />I - I
<br />ii Motion carried. appro veil
<br />
<br />ilil d" t 'b k l' d th k f h ' d !l
<br />J. Awar s Rev~ew Com ttee Repor - Mr. Gr~ s ov out ~ne e wor 0 t e com ttee an :'
<br />i 6/9/71 its recommendations. Rather than a certificate, the committee suggested that visi~~~=ng - II
<br />[I digni taries, members of Boards and Commissions, etc., be presented wi th an engraved II
<br />II plaque. For younger people, a key ring ounted on a card might be a sui table memento. i
<br />II I
<br />Ii , I I
<br />'i Mayor Anderson suggested that some administrative procedures might be necessary to I
<br />:1 establish a poli cy for desi gnating those to recei ve awards. He reques ted Mr. Gribskov I
<br />11 to work wi th staff on this. I "
<br />II I .
<br />! I,
<br />,; Mr. Gribskov moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to accept the report of the conmrr ttee. Motion Il
<br />1'1 carried. approve~'l
<br />I I'
<br />
<br />;i K. Appeal from Planning Conmrrssion Action (Set Hearing) - W. H. Rappel appealed a con- III
<br />\\ 6/9/71 ditiona1 use approval by Planning Commission to permit expansion of ASUO Child Care ,I e
<br />
<br />\1 Center at 1533 Moss Street "
<br />" 'I
<br />
<br />~ 6/15/71 - 7
<br />
|