06/28/1971 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r'"" ' I ~31 e il I' I II Staff recommends these petitions be accepted and engineering department proceed to hold d a public hearing at the time bids are opened. " ,I Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that Petitions 1 through 5 be accepted. Motion I. carried. 'I I: C. Quitclaim Deed Request, Gary Bernik - A memo was previously circulated to Council out- ': 'i lining this request. A strip of land between 26th Avenue and 27th Avenue is not i claimed. This strip was created by surveying errors. The City has no title interest " in the property, but has accumulated charges in -paving and sewer assessments in the " amount of $188.88. It has been suggested that the city quitclaim the land in exchange for its investment. This has been done in other portions previously. Staff recommends that a quitclaim deed to Mr. Gary Bernik be signed in exchange for the fee of $188.88 and that the City retain the right for utility easements over said strip. , I Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Council accept the recommendation of . " administration and a deed be exchanged for the amount outlined above. R~11ca~15loKe~._~~ e All councilmen present voting aye, the motion carried. D. Liquor Licenses approved by Police Department - RMBA and PB Licenses for Jack's Tavern, 24 West 8th (Bud Nixon) (Change of ownership) Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the request be granted. Motion carried. I ORDINANCES COUNCIL BILL NO. 9442 - Relating to nuisances caused by dogs and amending Section 4.365 of the Eugene Code, and deeil:aring an emergency was submitted, andd)1)2.~'~.[C5h;b:,~~:<qJ1esting,' i;jf;:-was read' iriJ,);;il}l?5.' ': ,_:~;"_ __ ' .,,'~ ;-:,_.~.':~: . :~~"::~ _ ._",,;~.-::.:c~,--~~-__ ~".J - '- - c -- --,.;.-.. .- ,- i II Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only ! Hith unanimous consent of the Council. I Mr. Williams suggested that it might be well to include an appeal provision for neighbors. He felt this provision should only apply when neighbors did not object. City Manager explained that one of the reasons this matter was before the Council was because one of the neighbors did object to a situation of this sort. A judgment will have to be made whether the objection is reasonable or whether use of the animal is reasonable. An appeal procedure could probably be added which would put this matter before the City Council. Permits could be issued subject to discussion with neighbors, if that appeared appropriate. Mr. Mohr explianed that the nuisance portion of the ordinance would still be in effect so that the matter could be brought before the Court. Mr. Williams asked that this bill be read separately from the unanimous consent. Mr. Mohr agreed. Mr. Williams felt there might be some overriding reason the Council should grant permission for I this type variance, but he felt the fact a person lived in an industrial area would not give I license for that dog. Mr. Mohr explained that this amendment was a compromise, that the dog would still have to be confined, but when acting as a watchdog, could bark to protect property. Mr. Hershner asked how long the permit would be in effect. Manager explained that it would be revocable. e 'Y,b~ife"::'take].1i:;:6n~"motion as stated. A~l-_cotmcilinen voted aye exce<pt Mr,:...~ Williams, who voted no. e ,.-ih~~b:i:Ti"wj.sJ};el(i to the n'ext meeting for second reading. -' .--- COUNCIL BILL NO. 9443 - Pacific Northwest Bell Franchise was s'wmi tted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. - - C-~pies oLa Pacific Northwest Bell Franchise- (CouDcli,-Bill'No. 944'31 ha~e."cbeeI.1. dist-J;'ibute,d_~'to . - . . -~ - -- - ---- -' Councilmen. This should only be given first reading at this time so that notice of public hearing may be given and advertised before the meeting of ~uly 12. There is still one minor disagreement between the phone company and city staff, which it is hoped may be resolved before the next meeting. The point of disagreement is whether the telephone company should pay for permits to cut the street. The ordinance has been distributed to permit the Council to study it for the ne<.t two weeks. I, I' The bill was held. I I! COUNCIL BILL NO. 9444 - Paving alley between Grant Street and Chamber Street from 11th Avenue I to 12th Avenue was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. I' !: 1'\ e ~ 6/28/71 - 9