Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT C <br /> <br /> JOINT ELECTED OFFICIALS MEETING <br /> April 19, 2005 <br /> 5:30 p.m. (Commissioners' Conference Room) <br /> <br />City Councilor John Woodrow called the meeting of the City Council of Springfield to order. <br />Present: Anne Ballew, Joe Pishioneri, and Dave Ralston. Sid Leiken and Tammy Fitch were <br />excused. <br /> <br />City Councilor George Polling called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. Present: <br />Bonnie Bettman, George Poling, Andre~. Ortiz, Chris Pryor, Gary Pape, David Kelly and Betty <br />Taylor <br /> <br />Commissioner Anna Morrison called the meeting of the Lane County Board of Commissioners <br />to order. Present: Bill Dwyer, Bobby Green, Faye Stewart and Recording Secretary Melissa <br />Zimmer. <br /> <br />1. SECOND READ lNG AND PUBLIC HEARING/Ordinance No. PA 1221/In the Matter <br /> of Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) to <br /> Clarify and Provide Greater Flexibility for Public Safety Service Delivery in the Eugene- <br /> Springfield Metropolitan Area (Metro Plan, Growth Management, Policy 15) (NBA & <br /> PM 4/5/05). <br /> <br /> Kent Howe, Land Management, explained the purpose of the proposed plan amendment <br /> is to clarify the formation of a Public Safety District that would be consistent with Metro <br /> Plan policies. He noted there are no policies in the Rural Comprehensive Plan or other <br /> small city plans thataddresses special district formation. He said it was only the Eugene <br /> Springfield Metro Plan that has policies that address district formation. He indicated at <br /> the time the Metro Plan was developed, it didn't contemplate the need for special service <br /> districts that would be providing public safety services nor did the Metro Plan <br /> contemplate the financial constraints that would be placed on local government. <br /> <br /> Howe noted the Metro Plan has policies that specifically limit the formation of special <br /> service districts regardless of the nature of the services provided. He added the Metro <br /> Plan contemplates special districts for urban services and growth management. He <br /> indicated that Policy 15 appropriately limits their formation and links them to future <br /> annexation requirements in order for cities to measure growth-reducing services. He <br /> explained the services are limited to and consistent with benefits in reaction to public <br /> safety services to provide context for determining services that would be consistent. He <br /> noted the proposed amendment does not weaken the position of Eugene and Springfield <br /> or their ability to annex land or to control the proliferation of other growth inducing <br /> special districts. He said there were two criteria that were applicable to the authorization <br /> of the Metro Plan amendment: that the amendment is consistent with the statewide <br /> <br />Page 1 - Joint Elected Officials Meeting - April 19, 2005 <br />WD bc/m/05035/T <br /> <br /> <br />