|
<br />~
<br />
<br />1..f8
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br /> I
<br /> i
<br /> Il
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> I:
<br /> ,
<br /> I
<br /> i
<br /> i
<br /> Ii L.
<br /> I
<br /> i:
<br /> I:
<br /> [
<br /> I:
<br /> I:
<br />!!
<br />I:
<br />I;
<br />I,
<br />I'
<br />I:
<br />r
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />,!
<br />Ii
<br />iI
<br />I,
<br />Ii
<br />1
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />I;
<br />'I
<br />I.
<br />I
<br />"
<br />;.
<br />i,
<br />I,
<br />I
<br />I;
<br />
<br />"
<br />"
<br />I:
<br />!'
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />i:
<br />"
<br />r
<br />I,
<br />I.
<br />"
<br />I' M.
<br />"
<br />I.
<br />i
<br />"
<br />j:
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />I,
<br />I
<br />I:
<br />!i
<br />!:
<br />I,
<br />r
<br />I
<br />11
<br />Ii
<br />H
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />I:
<br />I'
<br />
<br />I ~
<br />I:
<br />I,
<br />
<br />r
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />\l
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />
<br />~,
<br />
<br />part 6fthe hearing it would be a factor. The Planning Director said the 1990 Plan
<br />can be considered an " umbrella" which fits over all the individual local plans; there
<br />are qualified statements on ESATS in the General Plan but no details.
<br />
<br />Comm
<br />2/23/72
<br />Affirm
<br />
<br />It was understood that one comndttee meeting would be set aside for briefing on the
<br />General Plan before the hearings commence.
<br />
<br />Res6lut,f,on, World 'Citizenship (Mundialization) ~ Kevin Cape" member of the Interna-
<br />tional eo-operation 'Comndttee, reviewed the Comndttee's action in bringing this resolu-
<br />tion to the Council. The resolution would recognize Eugene citizens' right to declare
<br />that bheir citizenship responsibilities extend beyond the city and nation and pledge
<br />efforts'as world citizens to the establishment of permanent peace based on just world
<br />law, and authorize the display of the united Nations flag on suitable occasions at
<br />City Hall. Mr. Cape said that adoption of the resolution would not entail expense to
<br />the City in displaying the UN flag, only authorize the International Co-operation
<br />Committee to do so. He cited reasons for'joining the world citizenship movement
<br />(mundiaLization): The UN flag would be a reminder to Eugene people of strong support
<br />which'!rr..~uld be given that organization, Eugene should be on record in saying that a
<br />world consciousness is an urgent necessity and a realizable goal, more public attention
<br />would be focused on the financial problems of the UN and the need for teaching foreign
<br />languages and affairs in schools at a time when interest seems to be declining, atten-
<br />tion would be focused on the problems faced by the Uni versi ty' s foreign students in
<br />the possible cutoff of funds from the State Legislature, and a method of revitalizing
<br />Eugene's Sister City Comndttee.
<br />
<br />Mr. Cape introduced Rev. Norman Leach of San Anselmo, California, executive secretary
<br />of World Youth Federation and advisor to the National Presbyterian Church on World
<br />Affairs. Rev. Leach distributed to Council members copies of a state f5f Minnesot,a
<br />statement on world citizenship. 'He explained the concept of "mundialization" and how
<br />it is beginning to be accepted in this country as a concepp of citizenship on a global
<br />level in areas of economics and social,'political, and idealistic issues. He ,reco~
<br />mended adoption of the resolution on a local level as a model for recommendation to
<br />the state level.
<br />
<br />Councilman Williams wondered whether adoption of the resolution would conflict with
<br />statement already 'made that the Viet Nam conflict is not in the' Council's sphere of
<br />responsibility. Rev. Leach replied that the viet Nam conflict is only one world prob-
<br />lem, and that a global perspecti ve is the aim of this movement. Councilman Williams,
<br />in answer to Mrs. Beal's question, said the people of Eugene indicated their position
<br />in the peace vote last year. Rev. Leach commented that students at the migh school
<br />level are in agreement with the ideals but differ on techniques.
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr said it would seem'the resolution could be used as an educational tool
<br />and if the trend of some citizens is toward isolationism then it would be even more
<br />reason to make more people aware of the international scene and how to fit into it.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Campbell 'moved seconded by'Mrs. Beal that the proposed resolution be scheduled
<br />for public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
<br />
<br />Comm
<br />2723/72
<br />Affirm
<br />
<br />It was agreed that a public hearing on the resolution would be scheduled for the
<br />March 13, 1972 Council meeting.
<br />
<br />Amendment Dog Control Ordinance - The proposed amendment would make the owner or
<br />person in charge of a dog responsible for keeping it from running' at large. The present
<br />code does not pinpoint the responsibility. Also, a quarantined dog would have to be kept
<br />out of contact with animals or people. The owner would be responsible for the cost of
<br />confinement, whereas,/,' now if the dog is confined at the Humane Society facili ty the cost
<br />has not always been collectable: At the present time if a dog has rabies there is no
<br />way the owner can be forced to keep the dog confined wherei t cannot coine into contact
<br />with other animals or people.
<br />
<br />Councilman Hershner questioned the wording of Section 2 saying he thought it would be
<br />difficult for an owner to keep a dog on the premises so as not to come in contact with
<br />any other animal or any person. If a dog does bite someone, the only way to comply
<br />would be to send it to the Humane Society facility or keep it caged in the home where
<br />there may be other animals or people other than the owner. '
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal said an owner might be completely unconcerned if a dog is rabid and suggested
<br />some addi tion might be' made to the amendment to ensure that premises where a dog is
<br />confined are adequate. Manager said the dog control officer in following up'on a biting
<br />incident would make sure the dog is confined in a safe place or take kt to the Humane
<br />Society since that authority is in the existing code.
<br />
<br />Councilman McDonald asked for definition of the term "running at large." Manager said
<br />the present code provides that "at large" means off a leash or outside a fenced area.
<br />Complaints'with regard to dogs running loose are referred to the Lane County Sheriff's
<br />office which provides control service to the City on a contractual basis.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal -said, she thought the ,ordinance was changed to provide a dog' could be under
<br />voice controL" of the owner. Mayor Anderson replied that it was felt voice control
<br />is not sufficient. Further discussion centered around length of time for confinement
<br />in relation to tests for rabies, and method of testing for rabies.
<br />
<br />2/28/72 - 12
<br />
<br />I'
<br />\1
<br />!l
<br />:'
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />"
<br />"
<br />I;
<br />'I
<br />1'1
<br />
<br />"
<br />"
<br />i;
<br />I,
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />I:
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />I:
<br />
<br />ii
<br />!!
<br />,I
<br />i!
<br />Ji
<br />:1
<br />'I
<br />,I
<br />;1
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />11
<br />:i
<br />'I'
<br />I,
<br />:1
<br />il
<br />1
<br />:j
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />;t
<br />I'
<br />:1
<br />
<br />I,
<br />
<br />;1
<br />!I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />'I
<br />'I
<br />'I
<br />Ii
<br />:1
<br />;~
<br />"
<br />"
<br />!I
<br />:1
<br />1\
<br />:i
<br />':
<br />:i
<br />'i
<br />"
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />;,
<br />q
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />:1
<br />
<br />:1
<br />
<br />"
<br />ii
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />-~
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|