Laserfiche WebLink
price differential is due to the difference in time. Sale 1 sold for $11,722 per acre in 11/93 <br /> and Sale 3 sold in 2/97 for $22,300 per acre, a compound rate of increase of almost 22% per <br /> annum. However, while this rate of increase may be applicable between late 1993 and early <br /> 1997, it is not considered applicable between 1993 and 2000. The rate of increase over this <br /> longer period is significantly smaller. Even so, it is apparent from these two sales and other <br /> data that land values in the south hills have increased significantly between late 1993 and <br /> early 1997. Based on this reasoning, Sale 1 suggests a value for the subject land parcel of <br /> more than $20,000 per acre. <br /> <br /> Sale 2 is similar to the subject with regard to size and general location, but it has better <br /> access. However, the sale took place in early 1993 and values have increased significantly <br /> since that time. Based on the reasoning recited above, Sale 2 suggests a value for the subject <br /> of significantly more than $18,244 per acre. <br /> <br /> Sale 3 involved a 91.71 acre land parcel which sold in early 1997 on the basis of $22,300 per <br /> acre. This sale is similar in size to the subject, but is better located and has better access. <br /> Overall, taking into consideration the time factor, this sale suggests a value for the subject <br /> of less than $22,300 per acre. <br /> <br /> Sale 4 took place in mid-1997 and involved a 19.69 acre parcel of land in the south hills, <br /> which sold for $24,378 per acre. It is significantly smaller than the subject, but otherwise <br /> similar. However, it is considered superior with regard to access (long frontage on Dillard <br /> Road). On balance with time, this sale suggests a value for the subject of less than $24,378 <br /> per acre~ <br /> <br /> Sale 5 involved a failed sale of a land parcel near the subject, which sold in late 1995 for <br /> $19,905 per acre. This property contained approximately 65.31 acres. The price and terms <br /> had been agreed to, however reportedly, the purchasers did not follow through and the sale <br /> did not close. This transaction indicates a value for the subject of mot than $19,905 per acre. <br /> <br /> Sale 6 - In mid-1998, the City of Eugene purchased 35 acres of the 65.31 acres for a park. <br /> The price was equivalent to $18,571 per acre overall. However, 12.30 acres were outside the <br /> UGB. The price per acre for the 22.70 acres inside the UGB was $25,925 per acre. This sale <br /> suggests a value for the subject of more than $18,571 per acre and less than $25,925 per acre. <br /> <br />Sale 7 involved a 43 acre land parcel which was assembled in two parts in mid- 1997. The <br />total purchase price for both parcels was $430,000 or $10,000 per acre. The parcel had steep <br />portions, significant wetlands, and relatively poor access. A plat was submitted and denied <br />by the City. Then, in 1999 the City purchased 16 acres of the steep portion for a price of <br />$180,000 or $11,250 per acre. The remaining 27 acres was subdivided into 59 lots, which <br />is only 2.19 lots per acre. The lots were situated on a 14 acre portion and a 13 acre portion <br />was left as open space to accommodate the wetlands. A simplified analysis of the seller's <br />effective price per acre is as follows: <br /> <br />Charles P. Thompson & Assoc., Inc. <br />C-McDougalLand.300 20 <br /> <br /> <br />