Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />:. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ber 20, 1971) and memo from City Finance Director commenting on findings listed by <br />auditors (dated January 18, 1972). The item will be brought to a future committee <br />meeting for discussion. <br /> <br />Comm <br />1/19/72 <br />File <br /> <br />U. Parks Department Award - Manager announced the Eugene Parks and Recreation Depart- <br />ment received the highest award of the Parks Maintenance Magazine for the combina- <br />tion parks maintenance building and restroom in ,Hendricks Park. <br /> <br />COllllJl <br />1/19/72 <br />File <br /> <br />V. Kathleen Thomsen letter re: Street lights and police costs was distributed to <br />Council members with the January 19, 1972 Committee agenda. <br /> <br />1/19/72 <br />File <br /> <br />A rollcall vote was taken on the motion to approve, affirm, or file as noted Items A through V <br />above. Motion carried, all cOWlcilmen present voting aye, except Mrs. Campbell voting no. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson said he appreciates the people's concern on lighting and said the Council is going <br />to be faced often with decisions which will call upon them to be environmental specialists taking <br />into account timing and safety, and it will not always be possible to achieve a balance. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell questioned procedure, asking how a Council member could have referred the matter <br />of mall loop street lights to the Design Review Committee with a motion on the floor to approve, <br />and the Mayor said she could moved to table or to amend. <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />e <br />i <br /> <br />III - TOPICS (Traffic Operation Program to Improve Capacity and Safety) - Copies of the Plan- <br />ning Commission recommendation for adoption of the TOPICS plan were distributed to <br />Council members together with copies of the Plan itself, with the understanding the item <br />would be brought up for discussion at the January 24, 1972 Council meeting. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />~' <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Mrs. Canlpbe11 inquired if funding for TOPICS was cut off and whether 11th Avenue project <br />was cut out. Traffic Engineer explained that local on-going projects already approved <br />are still bUdgeted and funded. After the approved on-going projects are completed, money <br />for Eugene-Springfield projects will be combined and apportioned on a priority basis; <br />that the 11th Avenue project will be completed under this program. Assistant Manager <br />cOlr.mented that $166,000.00 was budgeted for local matching funds for TOPICS, anticipating Comm <br />funds from unused projects in the rest of the State which. did not materialize. 1/19/72 <br /> <br />Traffic Engineer explained that the purpose of this plan is to increase capacity and facilitate <br />flow of traffic throughout the area. Eugene has joined with Lane County and Springfield for <br />funding under the Federal Highway Safety Act, and two projects are now Wlderway with this fund- <br />ing. He referred to specific portions of the plan and explained priority ratings on various <br />projects. The L-COG Transportation Committee and a citizens advisory committee have also <br />:recommended adoption. Because of cutbacks in Federal spending future funding will be shared <br />jointly by Lane County, Springfield, and Eugene and projects authorized on a priority basis; <br />those projects now underway will be completed under the present fWlding. <br /> <br />Mrs: Beal said that since Council members have had the report only three days she doesn't <br />feel they can be expected to make a decision on adoption of a plan of this magnitude without <br />'t'i:me for thorough review and study. She was told that the plan has been under consideration by <br />various agencies involved which accounts for the time elapsed since it was originally frewarded <br />by Cornell, HOwland, Hayes & Merryfield. Further discussion revealed no specific deailine for <br />a decision on the plan, and it was understood it would be carried over to a later meeting. <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />,18 <br /> <br />1/24/72 '- 11 <br />