Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayor Anderson commented on the various ways in which board and commission members are <br />appointed. He said the Building superintendent is now preparing a recommendation with <br />the idea of attaining some uniformity in the appointments, and that this may be some- <br />thing Council members may wish to consider and determine how they want the appointments <br />made. <br /> <br />A vote was taken on the motion as stated, and motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Corom <br />2/23/72 <br />Approve <br /> <br />A, <br />., <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson announced further appointments to be added to those announced at the committee <br />meeting on February 23, 1972: <br /> <br />Human Fights Commission - Ron Couser, 2345 Patterson Street, replacing Rev. Lemuel McKinnie, <br />for the 3-year term ending January 1, 1975 <br /> <br />Michael V. Phillips, 545 Sweet Gum Lane, reappointed for the <br />3-year term ending January 1, 1975 <br /> <br />He also announced a vacancy on the Sign Code Board of Appeals and asked Council members for <br />suggestions. <br /> <br />C. Vacation Alley between 7th and 8th from Olive Street east 160 feet (Jacobs/ERA) - The <br />Renewal Agency requested the Council to set a hearing date on the vacation of this <br />alley at the February 28, 1972 meeting to avoid delay in consolidating two parcels <br />in the renewal area. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the hearing date be set at the February <br />28, 1972 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. (See C.B.9598 page 14.) <br /> <br />Corom <br />2/23/72 <br />Approve <br /> <br />D. Sign Code Appeal, International King's Table, 25 Silver Lane - Manager said the peti- <br />tioner asked for a two-week delay on the hearing set for February 28, 1972 on the <br />appeal of denial of use of flags as external decor at this location. Principals in <br />the IKT firm will be out of town. There are no legal publications of hearing dates <br />on this type of appeal. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to delay the hearing two weeks. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Manager said Mr. Cleveland, attorney for International King's Table, requested delay of their <br />appeal until the March 27, 1972 meeting since he will be out of town. <br /> <br />E. Realignment of Ward Boundaries - Copies of a map showing present and proposed ward <br />boundaries were distributed to Council members. Bill Sugaya, planning office, pointed <br />out the proposed boundaries on a wall map and explained that they followed as closely <br />as possible precinct lines set by the County. The only instance where they were not <br />followed is in Precinct 401 where the County lines were changed after ward boundary, <br />realignment WaS made. This involves about 168 people. <br /> <br />Manager pointed out the locations of residences of present Council and EWEB members <br />, and said the boundary changes will not affect any elected encwnbents. <br /> <br />Councilman Williams asked if this change will be in effect until the next population <br />count in ten years. Manager said the Council could change the boundaries at any time <br />when there is need to equalize because of population COunt made by the City, any <br />significant annexation or any other major factor. He said it is not clear whether <br />it is required or optional to equali ze, but if any action is taken wi th the ward <br />populations completely out of balance',' an action could be challenged. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />e; <br /> <br />Councilman Mohr commented on the limits on which a challenge would be valid, that it <br />ranges from 6% in some states to .2% in others; the proposed wards vary from .8% to <br />1% and give the one man/one vote representation as closely as possible. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell asked whether the change is recommended for immediate decision. Manager <br />said he knows of no reason to delay it. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve the proposed ward boundary <br />realignment. <br /> <br />Neil'Murray, 653 West Broadway, expressed his dissatisfaction with the proposed boundary <br />of Ward III. He said that ward is at somewhat of a disadvantage because of inclus.ion <br />of two fairly diverse neighborhoods in the ward but separated by the River Road area. <br />He said he thought it would be of benefit to Council members in representing citizens <br />if each ward is made up of neighborhoods sharing common interests. Mr. Murray expressed <br />the opinion that WUd III would be better. made up of the Bethi].-Danebo area and enough <br />area to the south to equalize its population with the other three wards. <br /> <br />Mayor Andez:son said that under the present system representation is based on mathematical' <br />considerations. If it were a type or neighborhood representation pzppostion that was <br />wanted then the City would be in position to create eight wards and bring actual neigh- <br />borhoods into wards. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Manager: said the WillaJeenzie area does not have enough population in itself and has to <br />be combined with the portion to the west or south. The wjJ.lamette River and North Bank <br /> <br />4,4 <br /> <br />2/28/71 . 8 <br />