Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />ready existing problem, and that he fel.t the problem should be resolved once <br />and for all. He said there doesn't appear to be a need for that .type of serv- <br />ice in that area and elimination of the club will not handicap the communi ty <br />although it is recognized it will handicap Mrs. Johnson. <br /> <br />Comm <br />3/1/72 <br />File <br /> <br />Manager, said in answer t.o Mr. Mohr.'s question ,that the ,Laurelwood lease would expire on <br />April 10,' 1972. And that a ~hange' of ownership of ~n establishment having a liquor li- <br />cense must be approved by the Oregon Liquor Control Commission. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />M. Meeting re: Closure Por.t1and at 30th - Manager announced a me~ting. scheduled <br />to further d1.sCUSS closure of .Portland Street at 30th Avenue. The meeting <br />will be held on Thursday, March 16, 1972, at 7:30 p.m. at Francis Willard School. <br /> <br />Comm <br />3/8/72 <br />File <br /> <br />N. 1990 General Plan - James Pearson"president of the Eugene Planning COmnUssion <br />gave a brief history of the Plan from the time of the first Plan Advisory Com- <br />mittee'meeting in 1968 to the present time. He said the greatest change in <br />the draft presented at the first public hearings is the result of the change <br />in concept of' grow.th and of the entire area of t.ransportation. He said an <br />extensi ve land inventory of the urban area was taken and it was found an ex- <br />cess of industrially zoned land exists, considering development to the year 2050. <br />Also, there iss,ufficient undeveloped land zoned' for residential use of all densi- <br />ties to' satisfy the projected' population growth for 50 years wi thout expanding <br />present areas to which urban services have been extended. Approximately 40% of <br />all land zoned for residential use at the present time is unimproved. <br /> <br />, - , <br />Mr. pears'on said that as a iesu~t ',of, the analysis of development of the, com- <br />munity it was concluded that urban, sprawl which was developing was detrimental <br />to livability and very important with regard to tax monies expended for public <br />facilities which 'were not being used through development of land. Also, revi- <br />sions of the plan were made after the public hearings based on wri tten compila- <br />tions of testimony, which will be made available to the Council, and an oppor- <br />tunity was given to 're-evaluate specific areas of the Plan. A co-ordinating <br />comnU ttee was formed comprised of two members from each of the three planning <br />commissions (Lane County, Springfield, and Eugene) with the objective of compar- <br />ing changes suggested by each, cOmnUssion in an attempt to reach agreement on a <br />single plan which could be adopted by each corrunission. Concern wi th regard to <br />adoption of a single plan stemmed from experience with development in the Willa- <br />kenzie area and the adoption of an interim plan, resulting in divided opinion <br />between the County"and City relative to land uses in that area. Mr. Pearson <br />said the co-ordinating corrunittee process was very successful resulting in agree- <br />ment on revisions at the cOmnUttee level which were recommended, to the individual <br />comnUssions. Then in a final series of public hearings one plan was adopted by <br />the three corrunissions .He recommended this procedure in deliberations by the <br />County COmnUssioners, and Eugene and Springfield Councils in the hope that an <br />identical plan will be adopted by the three jurisdictions. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Howard T. Bonnett, member of the Eugene Planning Corrunission, read definitions <br />of the proposed Urban Service Area (USAL and said it was included in the Plan <br />Diagram. He said it was crucial and a cornerstone to the Plan, and is the actual <br />geographical area in which a minimum level of services would be available. There <br />is also a projected USA which is the estimated geographical area in which a full <br />range of services will need to be provided to accommodate development at any <br />future point in time. Mr. Bonnett said the USA is a flexible concepti there is <br />criteria in the Plan for its adjustment. It is hoped through the USA to achieve <br />preservation of prime agri cul tural land and development of undeveloped areas <br />for compact growth and utilization of public facilities which would not otherwise <br />be used efficiently. It would also make urban mass transit more economically <br />feasible. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Pearson described the transportation, element. He said the ESATS (Eugene- <br />Springfield Area Transportation Study) plan, prepared by professionals, was in- <br />cluded in the 1990 Plan arid guidelines of that plan followed until the time of <br />the first public hearings. Then it was found the ESATS plan was the most criticized <br />element of the General Plan. As a result the transportation element is the most <br />changed and revised from its initial publication by the Plan Advisory COmnUttee. <br />He said in his opinion the ESATS plan was conceived and formulated in the best <br />technical sense at the time it w.as put together, but because of the changes in <br />attitudes toward growth and transportation elements and as a result of the public <br />hearings, different conclusions were reached. As a result there will be an en- <br />tire restudy of the transportation element. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Bill Sugaya, planning staff, reported on the Citizen Participation element of <br />the Plan, and referred to it as a long process of attitude changes. He said the <br />Plan should be viewed as a process subject to change and not as a static Plan. <br />He said it is recommended for annual review with a major updating on a five-year <br />basis. It i~ also recommended that a citizens corrunittee be established to act <br />in an advisory capaci ty in implementing the plan and keeping it up to date. <br />',1j <br />\,J \:} <br /> <br />3/13(72 <br />