My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/27/1972 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1972
>
03/27/1972 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 4:28:00 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:09:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/27/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mrs. Campbell remarked that the 1990 Plan should not be adopted without some comment as to <br />the years of study in bringing it about. She said she feels it very worthwnile when something of <br />this nature is accomplished; that this Plan does establish priorities for use of tax dollars and <br />natural resources; that it is important to realize the Plan is flexible and the urban service <br />boundary is subject to change, but it also presents the opportunity to fill in land within the <br />boundary where services are already available. She noted that because of the change in attitude <br />of the public brought out at the Plan hearings, the ESATS plan will now be restudied; and that <br />hopefully a Citizens Advisory Committee will be s~t up for the 1990 Plan to assist the Council <br />wi th review. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />At Councilm9D Hershner's request, Resolution No. 2028 was read. <br /> <br />'Mayor Anderson said that, assuming Springfield and Lane County also adopt the Plan, it is <br />the most significant step yet taken in intergovernmental co-opaation on area-wide concerns. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to refer to the Eugene Planning Commission two <br />items for recommendation concerned with the 1990 Plan (1) possible inclusion of the <br />LCC valley area within the urban service boundary, (2) definition of statements with <br />respect to the Bethel School District boundary. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell wondered if the motion referred to the Oregon Research Institute. She said one of <br />the points of the Plan is to establish priorities, and that that area has a low priority. She <br />asked clarification of intent of the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr noted that <br />committee meeting, <br />Commission feels. <br />handled - referred <br />recting the Eugene <br />other agencies. <br /> <br />there has been no testimony before the Council, other than presentation at a <br />of the areas in question and said that he would like to know how the Planning <br />He said he is not quite clear on how amendments to the 1990 Plan should be <br />by County Commissioners, or joint Planning Commissions and he suggested di- <br />Planning Commission to find a way for referral to this Council and to the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"'"", <br /> <br />Considerable discussion followed on clarification of the motion, with Mrs. Campbell and Mrs.Beal <br />asking about.-..-the responsibilities of the Citizens Advisory Committee ~ <br /> <br />Manager said the process of considering amendments to the Plan has not been thoroughly explored, <br />and referring these questions to the Eugene Planning Commission would give them a vehicle for <br />working out a procedure whereby any suggested amendment would be unified consideration by all <br />three agencies.' <br /> <br />Planning Director said the Citizens Advisory Committee has not been appointed but that it will be <br />active in reviewing the Plan. Some issues have been discussed and will be taken back to the <br />other agencies on a continuing basis, but this has not'yet been worked out. <br /> <br />In response to question from Mr. McDonald, Manager explained the makeup of the co-ordinating <br />subcommittee which worked on amendments proposed at commission hearings. He said it worked very <br />well in resolution of problems, resulting in uniform acceptance by all three planning commissions. <br /> <br />Further discussion revolved around the intent of Mr. Mohr's motion. Mrs. Beal said the process <br />of review and constant updating of the Plan should be established at this time so that the Plan <br />qaes remain flexible. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion as stated, and motion carried, all councilmen present <br />voting aye, except Mr. McDonald and Mrs. Campbell voting no. <br /> <br />-~"""c <br />Resolution No. 2029 - Calling hearing April 10,1972 re: Withdrawing from Oakway ~a!er~Dis- <br />trict that area annexed north of Goodpasture Island Road, west of Delta Highway (Moyer Theatres), <br />was submitted. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to adopt the resolution. Rollcall vote. All councilmen <br />present voting aye, motion carried. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2030 - Transmitting to Boundary Commission annexation of area east of Valley <br />River (W. H. Shields), was submitted. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to adopt the resolution. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all <br />councilmen present voting aye. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2031 - Transmitting to Boundary Commission annexation of area between Delta <br />Highway and Goodpasture Island Road (K-Mart, Inc.), was submitted. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to adopt the resolution. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, <br />all councilmen present voting aye. <br /> <br />~ <br />r <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2032 - Transmitting to Boundary Commission annexation of area on Sarah Lane <br />north of Crescent Avenue (York/Bendix), conditional, letter requesting larger area be included, <br />was submitted. (See Council minutes March 13,1972.) <br /> <br />(j ~J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.