03/27/1972 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

WI Manager asked for clarification of whether the motion meant to refer the appeal to the Commission or is a request for better definition of the ordinance. Mr. Mohr said he would ask postponement of a decision on the appeal and refer the matter of definition to the Commission. In further clarification of what was being sent to the Planning Commission, the Building Superintendent read Section 4.6F of the Code to which Mr. Mohr referred. Mayor Anderson said he would deny the appeal because it is the Council's determination of what it seeks in proper signing in the community. He recalled lengthy debate at time of adoption of the language in the Sign Code and said it is possible the Council will have to make aesthetic judgment as to what constitutes a sign. Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion defeated, Councilmen Mohr, Beal, and McDonald voting 'aye; Councilmen Teague, Campbell, Bradshaw, and Mayor Anderson voting no; Councilmen Williams and Hershner abstaining. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to deny the International King's Table appeal of Sign Code Board of Appeals decision on use of flags at 25 Silver Lane. Motion carried unanimously. j B. Abatement, 3815 Willamette Street (Piller) Building Department inspection report was read recommending that the building be razed. (See Resolution No. 2036 page ~86.) . ,,-,~. ... C. Levying Assessments Council Bill No. 9600 - Levying assessment for paving, sanitary and storm sewers within Lakecrest Park Subdivision (71-29), submitted and read the first time on February 28, 1972 and held to this date to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties, was brought back for considerati~n with no written protests on file. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the council bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be appro-ved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16409. D. Rezoning Reque~ts - Planning Commission Report March 7, 1972 Recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. Council Bill No. 9609 - Rezoning to R-4 area 'at 1148 and 1154 Ferry Street (formerly C-2), Knox, was submitted and read by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present asking that it be read in full. -.. " , Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the council bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was de- clared passed and numbered 16410. Council Bill No. 9610 - Rezoning to C-2 SR area at southwest corner of 27th and Oak (formerly R-l) Baker, was submitted and read by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present asking that it be read in full. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the' council bill be read the second time by council bill number only , with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. .. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the. council bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16411. Council Bill No. 9611 - Rezoning to RG SR area at 2094 Roosevelt Boulevard (formerly M-2) Morgan, was submitted and read by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council,' and that the 'it) 3(27(72 = 2