My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/10/1972 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1972
>
04/10/1972 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 4:33:34 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:09:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/10/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilman Bradshaw ~aid because of a proliferation of this type service in the <br />area, a person in the'advocacy area as proposed by the Child Guidance service <br />should be studied to avoid duplication"of services. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal expressed concern about the time element in an L-COG review before ap- <br />pI ying for Federal funds. Mrs. VanHouten s ai d it is her understanding under, the <br />recent reorganization of L-COG, the Mental Health Task Force is now functioning <br />and is responsible for setting priorities in the mental health field, and that they <br />will have to review any grant proposal. She said, in answer to Mr. Teague, there <br />are no firm commitments for funds from other agencies yet, and that local agencies <br />approached raised the same questions being raised by the City Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to refer the request to Lane Council of <br />Governments for recommendation on priority and indicate in so doing that if L-COG <br />sees this as a major priority and proper activity the Council will indicate its <br />willingness to include the $3,000 in next year's budget. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell said she feels the Council should indicate to L-COG that 'this is <br />considered a top priority item. Mr. Williams replied the intention of his motion <br />was to leave the priority determination to L-COG. <br /> <br />A vote was taken on the motion as stated, and motion carried Unanimously. <br /> <br />Comm <br />3/29/72 <br />Approve <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />D. Amazon Parkway West Right-of-Way - Manager explained that John Breske" owner of <br />two parcels of land necessary for right-of-way for Amazon Parkway West, delayed <br />development of that land until the ci ty h"3d the opportuni ty to purchase. Council <br />authorization for purchase of the property 'is requested so that funds may be <br />provided in the 1972-73 budget. The price agreed upon is $-7,768.32. <br /> <br />Manager further explained that'the route for, Amazon Parkway~~st was determined <br />some years ago as a facility to be constructed. Recent concern has been ex- <br />pressed with regard to environmental impact such facilities may have on the com- <br />munity. A map was displayed showing the properties protecting the right-of-way <br />of the route decided upon. At this time it ,is still planned to build on that right- <br />of-way. PubLic Works Department has been asked to outline a .procedure, for an <br />impact study on this,project, but at,this,time it has not been completed. Manager <br />said if it is ',decided not to go ahead with the project something else can probably <br />be done with land already in the City's ownership. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson urged the Council to authorize purchase of the right-of-way on <br />the' ,basis ,of policy. already established. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal inquired about the area involved, and it was determined the right-of- <br />way will be 220 feet wide to include the roadway and the Amazon ditch, and that <br />2.96 acres will be utilized for right-of-way. Public Works Director said option <br />was taken on the Griffith properties previously for $500 per year, and authoriza- <br />tion is also requested to exercise that option. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal drew a comparison between the $3,000 requested by the Child Guidance <br />group and the azrount to provide right-of-way for a highway. <br /> <br />COIl1IJJ <br />3/29/72 <br />Appro ve <br />Motion <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Williams to authorize purchase of land for <br />Amazon Parkway West as outlined and carry out policy previously established. <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />E. Audit Contract, 1971-72 - A p~9posed contract has been developed with the current <br />auditing firm" Lybrand, Ross Bros. & ,Montgomery; for the year ending June 30, <br />1972 which will allow more of the audit statement to be prepared by City staff. <br />The auditing firm would then review the City work instead of actually preparing <br />the statements. It i's,'anticipated this would result in considerable saving to <br />the Ci t Y . <br /> <br />Councilman Williams asked jf the Ci tyis buying more" auditing than is necessary; <br />whether there' CQuld be a reduction in~:thec_amount:of information as provided in ' <br />the 1970;..71 audit, thereby effecting a saving. " <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Assistant Manager said the audit is performed according to State requirements. <br />The 'proposed 'contract tries to'reduce the amount of direct auditing and book- <br />keeping with City staff making up more of the schedules. There is nothing <br />extra being added in the audit report. <br /> <br />Finance-Director'said the ,State sets,requirements;for municipal 'auditing and <br />the audi ting firm follows that' procedure qui te strlct:]':l"~" <br /> <br />,.Manager said effort is also made to meet standards of National Finance Officers <br />for governmental audits, and that' administrati vely the audit report is used <br />quite extensively. <br /> <br />CJ:t, <br /> <br />411()/72 _ h <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.