My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/22/1972 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1972
>
05/22/1972 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:07:03 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:09:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/22/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />'. <br /> <br />Viola Sears, 660 East 22nd Avenue, thinks the area ~ould not be in competition to <br />other recreational facilities because they are usually crowded and need added space. <br />She said a survey of the neighborhood showed no object~on to use of the Y property for <br />bikes~ and' that she did not believe there is a need for additional housing in the area. <br />'I.' '.. , .,- <br /> <br />Michael Sprague, 231 East 12th Avenue, said he was aware of a number of organizations <br />within the community needing financial assistance more than the YMCA, and that the <br />proposed apartment development would only increase crowding an~ problems associated <br />wi th it. ' <br /> <br />Bryce Ringsdorf, 2172 Hilyard Street, asked that the rezoning request be denied and <br />more planning given to the area to see if something petter can be done wit~ the property. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson asked for a show of hands in the audience in favor and against the re- <br />I'zoning, and it' appeared to be about even. <br /> <br />'Mr. Richards, in answer to Councilman Hershner~'said theS'chool' District lease to the <br />Y is for 75 years from August 1953, and that during only one year, the 5lst, is there <br />an absolute right to purchase the property. Mr. Hershner asked the estimated life of <br />the building proposed for the property, and Mr. Richards replied that asa requirement <br />of the j oint venture the building must be kept in good repair and returned at the end <br />of the lease without any liens or encumbrances. He believes' it will be' a valuable <br />improvement at the end of that time. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Councilman Mohr asked about the argument made :that the Council has the responsibility <br />of protecting land in t,he public trust. Mr. Richards said other Century Fund lands <br />conveyed with intention of hO,lding' in public trust very clearly state the inte~ded <br />restrictions. However on this parcel no such restrictions appear in the deed. <br /> <br />In answer to Councilman McDonald, Mr. Richards said this land is not now on the' tax <br />rolls but will be upon 'completion of the 'development. He cited State law which requires <br />public land leased to private parties to be subject to taxation in the full amount - <br />this development it is believed will pay in excess of $20,000 at the current rate. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald commented on the number of units (46) and the developer's plan for four <br />'bedrooms per unit, 'saying that in light of the Uni versi ty' s cos:ts in keeping their <br />units filled it seemed' quite a numb'er ',of units. ,Mayor Anderson said the issue is <br />whether there are basic questions with regard to land use, whether the proposed use <br />will create undue problems for the area or particular hardship on the neighborhood. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on: motion to read the bill,the second time by council <br />bill number only. Motion carried, all councilmen present voting aye, <br />except Mr. McDonald voting no. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal'that the council bill be approved and <br />given final passage. 'Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, <br />except Mr. McDonald voting 'no, ,the bill was declared passed and numbered 16478. <br /> <br />B. Vacations <br />Council Bill No. 9689 -Vacating easement at Sylvan Street (20th) and Fircrest <br />Drive (Chamness), was sUbmitted and read the first' time by council <br />bill number and title only, there being no councilman present <br />requesting that ,it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seco~de~ by Mrs. Beal that the bill be read the second time by council bill <br />number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at <br />this time,. Motion carried Unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council <br />bill npmber only. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. <br />Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the ,bill was, declared passed and <br />nurTIbered l6479. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 9690 - Vacating easement between Mill and Ferry Streets from 2nd Avenue <br />south (Witzig), was submitted and read the first time by council <br />bill number and title oniy, there being no councilman present <br />requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mr~. Beal that the bill be read the second time by council bill <br />number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and fuhat enactment be considered at <br />this time. Motion carried unanimously andlthe bill was read the second time by council <br />I , <br />bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. <br />Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and <br />numbered 16480. <br /> <br />13; <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />5/22/72 - 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.