Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r- <br /> , . <br />different code provisions covering safety requirements could apply to buildings <br />thought worth .saving. Councilman ~ohr sugge~ted sch~duling a sho~ing of ~rofes- I <br />sor Dole's sl~des at a future coml7llttee meet~ng to g~ve the Counc~l help ~n under-, <br />standing Eugene's heritage in terms of older buildings. <br /> - <br />Alan Seder, architect, suggested appointment of a conmdttee to act in an advisory . <br />capacity to the Planning Conmdssion to be concerned not only with architectural <br />.structures but also with use of space. He referred to the park blocks, the pro- <br />:posed civic center, and other public projects and suggested such a group could <br />possibly lighten the load of PUD design reviews confronting the Planning Conmds- <br />sion and staff. Mayor Anderson remarked that the Council and Planning Commission <br />are charged with the decision making and will have to accept responsibility re- <br />gardless of recommendations made by any design review group. He said this report <br />points up the problem but legislation or appointment of a committee will not <br />necessarily provide answers; it is co-operation of people knowledgable in this <br />area, suggesting standards to be adopted and how best the situation can be handled <br />through the existing structure. He suggested the Southwest Oregon Chapter of AIA <br />would be a most capable group to recommend how this might be accomplished. <br />Councilman Bradshaw thought Professor Dole's slide show should be scheduled with <br />the idea of having a proposal made at the same time for a program to follow. <br />Councilman McDonald asked whether older buildings, if retained, will be listed <br />on the tax roll in view of the purpose of urban renewal to increase the valuation <br />in the downtown area. <br />It was understood Professor Dole would be asked to present his slides at a future Comm <br />committee meeting with the hope that interested groups in the communitq will bring 6/21/72 --' <br />suggestions as to how the Council might proceed. Affirm ~......." ." " <br /> -;f;.,:' '. <br /> "-- <br />M. -Historic Building Preservation, AIA Subcommittee - Councilman Mohr asked for <br /> scheduled time on a future committee agenda for report from an AIA subcom- <br /> mittee on preservation of historic buildings. Mrs. Campbell suggested that <br /> copies of a model ordinance prepared some time ago by the Ci ty Attorney's Comm <br /> office be made available for consideration at the time the matter of historic 6/14/72 <br /> buildings is discussed. File <br />N. ,Public Hearings Procedure - CoUncilman Mohr requested that the Council give <br /> its immediate attention to the matter of public hearings, asking that research <br /> material and memoranda prepared by the City Attorney's office and the Intern <br /> working in the Manager's office be considered as soon as possible. Assistant <br /> Manager said a report is in the City Attorney's office for legal review and <br /> will be ready soon. The report covers the area of public hearings held in the <br /> past to give the Council background for consideration of those things on which <br /> they may wish to change the hearing procedure. I <br /> At the request of the Mayor, Mr. Mohr reviewed his concerns with regard to <br /> the present hearings procedure. He feels most of those now held are required <br /> by Council ordinance, therefore can be changed by the Council, to a less time . <br /> consuming procedure. It is recogni zed the procedure cannot be changed for <br /> those hearings required by Charter or State law. He suggested use of Council <br /> subcommittees for hearing appeals which do not entai1po1iby matters. The <br /> subcommittee duty would be rotated, perhaps on a monthly basis, among members <br /> of the Council, wi th oral testimony taken;--~hen~9..-~ort wri tten report to the <br /> full Council, along wi th information gathered. In. that- way tlie-eouncil would <br /> have the necessary information on which to base a decision prior to regular <br /> Council meetings, as is the case on consent calendar items n'ow. More oral <br /> testimony at the time of the Council meeting could be taken, but with consent I <br /> of two-thirds or more vote of the Council. Mr. Mohr's coroerns stem from his <br /> feeling that the Council is not really addressing itself to citizens' concerns <br /> because it is so enmeshed in hearing appeals. <br /> Mayor Anderson favored the idea and suggested discussion at the next committee <br /> meeting. Mrs. Campbell noted that the Board of Equalization concerned with <br /> County matters is similar to the procedure suggested. Also that members of Comm <br /> that Board are paid. Councilman Hershner commented favorably, saying he would 6/14/72 <br /> rather the Council met each week than continue with present lengthy sessions. File <br /> , <br />O. Improvement Project Bid Procedure - Councilman Hershner asked for information <br /> with regard to bidding policy where separate bids are taken on sewers and . <br /> paving on the same project. He referred to bids considered at the June 12 <br /> Council meeting resulting in higher cost because of receipt of qualified bids <br /> (contract for low bid on sewer not accepted unless that contractor's bid, <br /> higher than the low bid, is accepted on paving), and the comment made at that Cornm. <br /> time that separate bids were taken to encourage bidding by smaller contractors. 6/14/72 <br /> It was understood the matter would be scheduled at a committee meeting. File <br /> 1'17 6(26(72 - 14 <br />