06/26/1972 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Bill No. 9738 - Rezoning to C-2 SR p~ope~ty at 1755 West 18th (Daggett), was submitted and ~ead the fi~st time by council bill numbe~ . and title only, the~e being no councilman p~esent ~equesting that it be ~ead in full. Councilman Williams noted that this o~iginally was a conditional use ,but is now being ~equested fo~ ~ezoning. Manage~ said the laund~omat o~iginally at this location existed unde~ t~ansitional use when the~e was no conditional use p~ovision in the zoning o~dinance. M~. Moh~ moved seconded by M~s. Beal that the bill be ~ead the second time by council bill numbe~ only, with unanimous consent of tlE Council, and that enact- ment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was ~ead the second time by council bill number only. M~. Moh~ moved seconded by M~s. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was de- clared passed and numbe~ed 16534. 'D. Levying Assessments Council Bill No. 9699 - Levying assessments for sanitary sewe~ in Crest Heights Sections G & H (a~ea bounded on north bynne 300 feet north of that por- tion of C~est D~ive extended which lies on south line of NW\, '. Section 7, T18S, R3W, W.M., on east by a line 200 feet east of Law~ence St~eet extended, on south by 40th Avenue extended, and on west by a line 800 feet west of Blanton Road), submitted and read the frist and second times on May 22, 1972 and held to this date to allow prope~ notice of assessment to~be given owners of affected prope~ties, was brought back for consideration yith letfi:f. b"f"::p:rotest frb.:n__MjTr~-Garnet Estate noted. .. "<--.. . , -- Public Wo~ks Di~ecto~ showed Council members the lots involved on a map. He said the City could be challenged if standard assessment procedure is not followed. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by M~s. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All-councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16532. E. Annexation - Oakway Golf Course I Annexation, Oakway Golf Course - Planning Commission May 9, 1972 recommended approval, including the Cal Young home site opposite the intersection of Ca1 Young Road and Norkenzie, subject to the condition that the owners agree not to request sewer service for the southwest portion of the property until City sewers are on Country Club Road, and subject to the suggestion that the developer . ,consider the need of a school site and a variety of housing types to comply with :the City's housing policy. Also, subject to deeding of additional right-of-way for Oakway Road as the development progresses. It is the understanding that :the applicant for rezoning proposes to develop the property through combination of a smaller golf course, different densities and conformations of residential ( I use through PUD procedure. Councilman Williams expressed concern with the amOunt of multiple housing in the area and additional traffic load crossing the Ferry Street bridge if the proposea housing is added. Manager said as a matter of interest an annexation request coming to the Boundary 'Corrunission in July, if approved, will result in complete encirclement of that : area ~round the Valley River and the entire Wi1lagi11espie area. This Oakway annexation is a part of that area. Boundary Comndssion, in considering its posi- tion, has asked whether the City favors this encirclement. Staff discussion leads to belief that this area does belong in the City and that any further annexation of property within that island area should only occur as the City Comm is in position to provide services and initiates such annexation itself, lead- 6/14/72 ing to a series ,of ~ctions rather than the entire area being annexed a~_one time. Pub H~ng Annexation, OakWay Golf, Course '"":" C-ouncilmarf'McDonald questioned the reason -for - annexation of the Oakway Golf tourse property. "Assistant Manager explained that the annexation was petitioned for housing development. Mr. McDonald ex- pressed concern with resulting traffic in view of the present load crossing the Comm Ferry Street bridge. Mayor Anderson noted that these questions would be brought 6/21/72 out in public hearing (scheduled for Monday, June 26,1972). Pub Hrng '-' .~- ~ jgl. 6/26/72 - 3