07/24/1972 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the application. Mrs. Bartels said location of a tavern here would not be in keeping with the residential neighborhood. Mayor Anderson arrived at the meeting. ~ Jeff Lynn, area supervisor for McDonalds' restaurants, objected to the tavern's location . in a residential and family-type business area. He also felt owners of a tavern would not observe landscaping and aesthetic values. John Langan, applicant, said he did not feel proximity to schools a problem since their customers were limited to 21 and over. He also stated his belief that there is not an oversupply of taverns in the River Road area. In answer to Councilman Mohr, Manager said the proposed location is in a C-2 SR zone, under which the Planning Commission can require staff approval of plans for buffering, landscaping, access, drainage, etc. Mr. McDonald said it was his understanding the zone was residential and wanted it made clear to those objecting to the tavern that it is a commercial zone. Manager said there is considerable residential use still in the area though it was zoned commercial shortly after its annexation to the City: At the request of Councilman Teague a show of hands was reqasted of those opposed to the tavern's location. Some of those responding also remarked on the length of time they have maintained homes in the area and felt a tavern in the neighborhood undesirable. Jan Turk, reisdent in the Riviera Village apartments, commented on the traffic situation ~ as it exists and opposed the tavern's location on the basis it would tend to increase ~ traffic congestion. Councilman Williams said it is his feeling the question is one of equity - City zoning ordinances prescribe the type of uses allowed in different areas and in this instance the zone is proper for this use. In no other instance is the Council requested to pass on whether a business should be allowed in a certain zone when it meets the criteria of that zone. He cited the areas of concern of the OLCC and said the applicant has met those requirements. So, he questioned whether it is proper for the Council to con- duct a "popularity poll"~ in its consideration of liquor license applications when there is no other business subject to the same consideration. Mr. Williams added that with respect to this location's proximity to residential areas it would seem of social benefit for customers to be close enough to walk to and from a tavern rather than having to drive. Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to recommend approval of the applica- tion for the Riviera Tavern. I Councilman Teague expressed the opinion that it is quite evident the people in that area I do not want a tavern there, and for that reason he would not vote in favor of it. Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried, Mr. Teague voting no. i~ Manager said OLCC has indicated they would make staff available to work with City staff , in developing criteria for use in consideration of future liquor license applications. Mayor Anderson assumed the Chair. I D. Bid Openings - Public Works 1. Paving and sanitary sewer alley l;letween Oak and High from 27th to 270 feet north (Opened June 20, 1972) - Considered at Council meetings on June 26 and July 10,1972 < '.-and'" heid:for~-c;o-lli1cil to view and to consider possibility of vacation (see tabula- tion iri -Juries"26' ;. 1972 Council minutes). Albert Cheevers, 135 East 27th Avenue, gave his reasons for opposing the paving as stated as previous Council meetings. Mrs. Beal reiterated her belief that Mr. Cheevers is in the position of other owners of small properties having to pay for alley and street improvements for the major benefit to apartment complexes. ,Manager explained in answer to Councilman Williams the process for vacating alleys should property owners consent, and the assessment pro rated to the abutting prop- :,erties should the alley in question be paved. ~ Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to award contract to the low Bidder . for paving the alley (Wildish Construction for $7,343.10). ! Mr. Williams said he could see no clear public purpose for alley paving as com- I pared to street improvement at the expense of abutting residential properties. I ,He suggested stating a policy that City will not use power of assessment to force I ,residential property owners to share cost of alley paving when it is of major : .benefit to other properties. Manager said such a policy would result in fewer! , ~ ~ -- - ------,.- .-:-~ _ ---.-,--....-.-. ;;.~,..... -:r!._ -~_~".._____' ~ ~..~__.__'" .__. ".......--..-~___~_r-- '_'_" ---,~__....J 02 , lD 7/24/72 - 2 ----