|
<br />\
<br />
<br />
<br />Mrs. C.ampbell 'asked what effect inclusion of a deadline in the sign ordinance would
<br />have on the non-conforming notices to be sent out. Building Superintendent felt
<br />the Ci ty could assume responsibili ty of second notices. This would gi ve information
<br />as to whether the proper people were notified and some followup on attempts to
<br />'. :rectify non-conforming signs. ;
<br />
<br />Mrs. Campbell moved to instruct the staff to prepare an ordinance to include a dead-
<br />line date for an appeal within the next year. There was no second.
<br />
<br />Manager suggested rather than instructing preparation of an ordinance that the I
<br />staff be asked to review the problem to see if an ordinance is needed or what
<br />kind of procedure could be developed. I
<br />t
<br />Mrs. Beal asked about the penalties in the event of non-compliance with the Code.
<br />Building Superintendent said the ordinance, in addition to providing for a penalty,
<br />;provides for removal of signs by the City.
<br />
<br />Mr. Reeder asked whether the front footage referred to in the Code applies to
<br />property or building lineal footage. Building Superintendent answered it is bof;h,
<br />depending on the different categories or sign districts. I
<br />\
<br />
<br />In answer to Ed KenY9n, Register-Guard, Building Superintendent estimated 1000 to : ,j
<br />1500 non-conforming notices will be sent and that the greatest impact will probably,
<br />be wi th regard to identity signs and highway oriented signs. _..!',-<-i( Comm
<br />!: 7./12/72
<br />~ It was understood the staff will bring back a recommendation on timing for appeal~~!fvm
<br />e' pz:oc~d~re. _ .' w -, - .' ,-- - ~--
<br />
<br />J. Oakway Annexation - Traffic - Councilman Williams raised tffiquestion of estimated
<br />time necessary to bring the LCOG Transportation Planning Comndttee study to the
<br />level of ESATS, saying it would appear risky to wai t fi ve years for a transporta-
<br />tion plan in view of traffic pressures at the present time. He suggested a meet-
<br />ing between the Council and the Transportation Planning group with the idea of
<br />modifying the time frame, adopting an interim plan, or at least gaining some un-
<br />derstanding of what is needed to deal with traffic problems.
<br />
<br />Planning Director said in making the statement that it would take about five
<br />:years for the TPC study to be at the ESATS level, he WaS not saying ESATS is
<br />; the total answer. But with the level of funding available and the length of
<br />time to accomplish ESATS, he felt it would take that long before a study as ,
<br />I competent as ESATS could be developed. '
<br />
<br />I Public Works Director said a recommendation for funds was made to the LCOG Di-
<br />rector but they were not included in the LCOG budget for this work.
<br />
<br />Manager suggested preliminary discussion between the Mayor (the Council's re-
<br />.. presentative on LCOG) and the Chairman and Director of LCOG to determine alterna- Comm
<br />-, ,tives, whether a portion of the study could be segregated, or what could be 7/19/72
<br />gained from a general meeting of members of the two agencies. It was under- Affirm
<br />s!C?O(;'(MCi.y_o~_~I!~er?g,n, wQ..~J_d b~ r~gu~s!r:;_c!_t_o. contact ther-C.OG people in _ thi,s _::egard.,
<br />
<br />I K. Public Hearings Procedure, Committee Report - Councilman Mohr, chairman of the sub-
<br />committee appointed to make recommendations with regard to Council public hearings
<br />procedure, distributed to Council members report of that subcommittee. The sub-
<br />,committee recommends limiting public hearings to assessments,and appeals from Zoning.
<br />Board decisions, these to be heard by a panel of two Council members serving on a
<br />three-month rotating basis. Written report of the hearings will be entered on
<br />the Council's consent calendar for consideration by the entire Council. Further
<br />oral testimony before the entire Council will require a majori ty vote of the Council
<br />quorum. The subcomrncrttee recommended adoption of a resolution instituting this Comm
<br />'system of public hearing. It was understood the subject would be discussed at 7/12/72
<br />the July 19, 1972 comrncrttee meeting. File
<br />
<br />L. Joint Housing Committee Meeting, Report from Britain - Betty Niven, recently re-
<br />,turned from a stay in Great Britain, announced she will give in-depth reports to
<br />the Joint Housing Comndttee, from which it is hoped recommendations will COJpe to
<br />the Council, with regard to public housing in Britain and its effect on the balance Comm
<br />.--=-. 'of the housing market, how it works, etc. The meetings at which the reports will ~/12/72
<br />, be given are July 18, August 15, and September 19, 12 :00 noon, at the Eugene Hotel. File
<br />
<br />M.Banitation/Hea1th Care, City-County Jail - Manager reported the City is working
<br />,with the County Health Department with regard to changing procedures at the jail Comm
<br />,to correct a sanitation/health problem. Council members were requested to refer 7/12/72
<br />:tQ t.~~__staff any calls whigl:l1l'lay_result fro.1!' an.t.~_~ip'i!1._tei1_E.l!.blicf.ty. _._ ~ ___ File
<br />
<br />
<br />;;)~ :;L 7/24/72 - 8
<br />
|