Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\ <br /> <br />-- - - -- <br /> <br />- -._-- <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell suggested making a community atti tude survey to dete~mine, factors -"~fu?' <br />keeping voters away from the polls on City elections. Mr. Mohr sal.d thl.s was CQfiMf' <br />mentioned as a project for the university class which ,surveyed mall uses, and 7/26~72 <br />they may be interested in undertakingsuqh a study thl.s fall. Aff2rm <br /> <br />. M. Behavorl.a.L c;onauct, Downtown Mall - Councilman Teague asked for a report :txom <br />staff with regard to complaints on conduct in the downtown mall. He wante~ <br />to know what can be done legally by the Council to stop unacceptable behavl.or. <br />Manager said the proposed mall ordinance is substantially the same as the . <br />existing rules and regulations and there is very little limitation on behavl.or Comm <br />'except as it affects the mall facili ties. It was understood a report would 7/?.~(72 <br />be brought to the Council. Aff2rm <br /> <br />N. Traffic Congestion - Councilman Teague asked staff to schedu1~ some future _ Comm <br />time for discussion of traffic on Franklin, West 11th, the brl.dges, 6th and 7/26/72 <br />. 7th,_ to }.)r~11.<J. the COlJ!lc:~~up_ t? ..d,:te ,on,. t.h~_Eres~_1?t:_s~atus d!!~t .flltu.:f? _PJ.Wl~. Affirm <br /> <br />o. Santa Clara Sanitary Sewer District - Boundary Commission Wl.ll conside, at its <br />August 3 meeting a petition for creation of a sanitary sewer district in the <br />Santa Clara area. Manager' distributed copies of a memo to Council members <br />giving staff position on the proposal, raising some questions and suggesting <br />alternatives. He said if it is agreeable with Council the memo would be for- <br />warded to the Boundary COnmUssion, indicating it is a staff memo and not the <br />Ci ty' s offi cial stand. Then the Council would have the opportuni ty for dis- i <br />cussion before an official statement is submitted. A final decision by the . <br />~ 'Boundary COnmUssion probably will not be made until its October meeting. It . Comm <br />. ,was agreed the matter would be brought back for further discussion, and that 8/2(72 <br />h d C ' , d d Aff2rm <br />the meIlO wO!lld beJ9xward.ed to t__e Boun ~ry ._.omnus~l.ol}__.<3.s rec:o~n ..l:! _:...___.__~_ <br />. . , <br /> <br />P. Absence, CouncilmaIiMOhr - It was understood CoUncilman Mohr would be excused 8/;~r:;; <br />from Council meetings on August 14 and 28, 1972. Affirm <br /> <br /> <br />Q.Capital Projects, November 1972 Ballot - Manager distributed to Council members <br />copies of a 11/ellK.) (7/26/72) with a list of 5-year capital project needs to be con- <br />sidered in putting together a capital program ballot measure for the November <br />election. He explained in detail the items listed and priorities as they relate : <br />ito public safety and avoidance of increased operating costs. The list was sum- <br />Imarized to show the impact of combined bond issue and serial levy in terms of <br />itotal borrowing, total annual levy, and effect on property tax, using inflation <br />jfactors and increased valuation as can be projected based on past experience. <br />liThe aUditorium/convention center was not given a priority since it has already <br />:been decided that a $5.5 million bond issue will be submitted to the voters, and , <br />I ;a discussion on that project is scheduled for commi ttee meeting August 9. Others I <br />:listed in their order of priority were fire department buildings and equipment, <br />corrections facility, arterial streets and overlays, park acquisition and develop- <br />ment, neighborhood renewal, library expansion, low-income housing, street lighting, <br />a _airport, and maintenance yard. There is an August 28 deadline for deciding how <br />- ,the program will be submitted for the November election. <br /> <br />'In answer to Councilman McDonald, Manager said no land has been acquired for fire <br />I station sites, and that under a serial levy options can be taken on land purchases <br />for park purposes and exercised as llK.)ney is brought in over a period of time. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell asked if amounts were included for operating costs and added person- <br />nel. Manager replied that the operating costs for the fire stations and Library <br />expansion were inc1 uded and that the other major capi tal items will have no need <br />for addi tional operating costs or personnel. And lower maintenance costs on new <br />facilities would offset costs of needed personnel for those facilities. With re- <br />gard to the Ridge Line Park, Manager told Mrs. Campbell a figure was included, <br />even though there is no solid proposal for such a park, as something which should <br />be anticipated. <br /> <br />Discussion turned to low-income housing and the City's position with regard to <br />financing subsidized housing and construction of new low-income rentals. Mr.Williams <br />;remarked on the Joint Housing Committee's concern with dispersal of this type hous- I <br />. , <br />;ing throughout the City and difficulty in obtaining funds from HUD for leasing exist- <br />:ing rentals. Manager also commented on difficulty housing authorities are having <br />. ;iin obtaining appropriated funds held back by the Office of Management and Budget. <br /> <br />)Councilman Mohr asked if a comparison was made between tax rates resulting from <br />:bond issues and serial levies. Finance Director said interest would increase bond <br />:issue costs 45% over serial levy costs, but there is the advantage of having a <br />lump sum avapab!:~~t:__()11..~.!=.!:me. <br />.-. .-.t.,- _.~. __..~___~_____._.._____.__~.~___~ .________ _ ___________-'_ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />,;J 41 8/14/72 _ 7n <br />