Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ "'" <br />'I' <br />August 28 Council meeting. Council members agreed w1th Mayor Anderson'ssug- <br />gestion that a Couneil subcommittee review the list of capital projects with <br />staff and bring recommendations to the Council on deletions. He appointed Council- <br />(man Mohr as chairman to serve wi th Mrs. Beal and Mr. Teague. It was understood - <br />'the recommendations brought back should incl ude total amount of capi tal program . <br />)to be submitted to the voters, priorities, and manner in which the issues are to <br />;be presented. ~.=-' <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the Council approve a separate <br />:measure for the Auditorium bond issue on the November ballot. <br /> ! <br />Mayor Anderson recommended no action on manner of presentation, saying announce- <br />:ment of a decision on anyone measure at this point would appear to place 'greater <br />,importance on that item than on others to be considered. Councilmen ,Mohr an~ <br />Bradshaw concurred, saying it would be unfair to give weight to one ~tem unt~l <br />every capital project item is considered. Mr. McDonald withdrew his motion. Comm <br />It was understood public testimony would be heard at the August 14 Council meeting, 'a/9/72 <br />subcommi ttee to meet thereafter to consider recommendations upon which to base a Affirm <br />decision by the entire Council at its August 28 meeting. <br />U. Highway 126 Project' - Councilman Mohr asked the Manager' to review 'the status <br /> of Highway 126 route alignment, referring to a recent article on the subject <br /> in the Register-Guard. With the consent of Mr. Mohr, the following discus- <br /> sion took place after other business on the agenda was completed. I <br />'Manager explained that the City traffic, planning, and public works staffs e <br />1 <br /> in the next few months will meet with State Highway Department engineering <br />; and traffic staffs to develop feasible alternative alignments to meet traffic <br />; needs, taking into account construction and planning problems. These alterna- <br /> tives., based on feasibility from traffic standpoint, will be presented to the <br />,Highway Department after an environmental impact team has been formed. That <br />; team will welcome help from a local environmental impact team and their work- <br />,ing relationship will be worked out by State and City people. <br /> Of 88 State projects requiring impact studies ,about one-half will require i <br /> full blown complete efforts. There is no set of priorities other than that <br /> those projects already under contract will be taken first for impact studies. <br /> Those requiring impact statements but not yet under contract (which category I <br /> , <br /> includes Highway 126) will get next attention. There has been no shifting <br /> of priority with regard to Highway 126 and State will make every effort to <br /> make the studies and give equal consideration to this project. Manager said \ <br /> his office will stay in touch with State Highway officials and try to keep <br /> track of the time schedule for the impact studies. <br /> At the request of Mrs. Beal, Manager said he would prepare for distribution '. <br /> to the Council a written statement of Highway 126 project status as presented. <br /> In response to question from Ed Kenyon, Register-Guard reporter, as to why, <br /> ,if there is no change in the State's schedule, the project is discussed, <br /> CouncilllJan Mohr said he interpreted from the news arti cle that City administra-. <br /> ,tion' was making an effort to move the project up on the State's priority list, Comm <br /> 'and such is not the case. The City is keeping in contact with State Highway 7/26/72 <br /> officials to see that alternatives are presented when the State environmental <br />, team is readl.l to make an imoact studl.l. File <br />. - ,-. ,. - I <br />''''"v:'- RePresentative, UniversTty of Oregon'Student Body - Letter was presented from Comm <br /> . Cliff Zukin, president of MUO Senate, introducing Fred Wasson as representative 7/26/72 <br /> and spokesman for the MUO at Council meetings. File <br />W. Distribution <br /> ~"J;rLette;f:,from Mass Transit Division, State Department of Transportation, with , <br /> ~;;regard to feasibility of consolidating school and transit bus systems. <br /> :2. Minutes of Citizen Participation Meeting held July 17, 1972 in the Danebo I <br /> nei gborhood. Comm <br /> ~:.3. Letter addressed to the Parks Director from Phyllis Ford expressing apprecia- 7/26/72 <br /> / tionfor recreation programs at Celeste Campbell Center. File . <br />X. Auditorium Brochure -Councilman Williams objected to wording included in a , <br /> I <br /> brochure distributed by the Auditorium Association at its summer production <br /> "1776" which states: "... If the Eugene auditorium/convention center is not <br /> built, all of us will lose a great deal. Subsidized housing will probably be <br /> built on this site...." <br /> ;)~r 8/14/72 - 13 <br />