|
<br />?
<br /> Council ,Bill No.- 54.- Rezoning to R-2 SRarea south of 15th ,north of Amazon Canal, between
<br />Hayes and Grant, was ailimitted and read the first time by concH 'bill 'number and titl.e' only,
<br />there be no co.uncilman present requesting that it be read 'in full.
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the : bill 'be read the second time by council bill -
<br />number only, with unanimous consent of the Council", and that enactment be considered at this .:
<br />time.. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill"number
<br />only. .,.'
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. ,All councilmen present voting aye; the bill was declared passed and numbered 16597.
<br /> Council Bill No. 55 - Rezoning to R-l area east of Souza St.reet, west of BeltL:ine". Road,
<br />was submitted and read the first time by'council bill number and tit~le only, there bemgno
<br />councilman present requesting that it be read in full. '
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the bill be read the second time by council bill
<br />number only, with unanimous consentof the Council" and that enactment be considered at this time.
<br />Motion carried unanimously ,and, the bill was read the second time by council bill number only.
<br /> , ' "
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the bill: be approved and. given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. All councilmen preesent voting aye, the bill was declared, passed and 'numbered '16598.
<br /> , .
<br /> .~ .;..~~~"".~6~
<br /> 2o~c}~~Bill No. 56 - Rezoning to C-2 PUD area on east side of Oak Street extending 450 feet
<br />to the s'outh from corner of 28th and Oak, was submitted and read the first time by council bill
<br />number and' title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it'be read in full.
<br /> , '- .... -,. ~.
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the bill be read the second time by council bill
<br />number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and held pending PUD approval by Planning
<br />Commission. Motion carried unanimously.
<br /> Council Bill No. 57 - Rezoning.~o R-2 PUD area south of'13th, west of Polk Street, was sub-
<br />mitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, there being no councilmen
<br />present requesting it be read in full.
<br />Gordon Elliot, 1287 Irvington Drive, said Mr. Baitis had relinquished that portion of property
<br />in his ownership included in th~ rezoning request.when den$ityhe desired was not allowed.
<br />Mr. Elliot would like to go ahead with the R-2 PUD zoning on his ownership and asked approval
<br />of the requested zone for that portion.
<br />Manager suggested, since final passage of the ordinance. will. be held. anyway pending approval of
<br />plans for development of the property, that after Planning Commission consideration of the plans
<br />submitted, .i.f .only that portion belon,ging to Mr. Elliot is used., then the ordin9-llce 9an be
<br />changed accordingly upon.resubmission to the Council. !
<br /> Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the bill be read the second time by council
<br />bill nurriber only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and held pending PUD approval by Plan-
<br />ning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. ..
<br />F. Rezoning Recommended for Denial - Planning Commission July 5, 1972
<br /> 1. 4669.Royal Avenue, RA~~o C-l (Prime)
<br /> Planning Commission July 11, 1972
<br /> 2. East of Belt Lirie Road, south of Avalon and w'est of Echo Hollow Road, C-l to C-2(Murphy)
<br /> 3. 120 feet south of 29th Avenue between Willamette and Portiand, RA' and R-3 to C-2 (Scott)
<br /> 4. 1331 Washington Street, R-l to R-2 (Smith)
<br /> 5. East of Grand Avenue, northwest of Sycamore Street, RA to R-2 (Youngblood) I
<br /> 'Wi thO regard to Item 3 (29th' 'and Portland)' Ed Scott, realtor petitioning the rezoning,
<br /> . and David Vinson, attorney, urged Council approval of the rezoning. They stated ,the
<br /> property has no use as it is now zoned, other than for movement of cars into the adjacent
<br /> , -car wash, "and cannot be sold at a price which would reflect its value unless commercially
<br /> zoned. Archie Weinstein emphasized the purchase price of the property was $4.15 per
<br /> square foot, but the property is landlocked. Manager noted .it could be used as a normal
<br /> extension of the parking lot to the north.
<br /> Jim Saul, Planning~ reviewed history of zoning on properties in this area," culminating
<br /> in granting of hardship variances allowing tire storage for-the Mobil station and'drive- I
<br /> way and parking for the car wash. However, riei ther variance included the property now
<br /> being considered for C-2. In its consideration of the request, the Planning Commission
<br /> felt the proposed development on this property could more appropriately be covered by a
<br /> similar variance rather than rezoning.
<br /> Councilman Williams ,asked if site review procedures would provide the necessary control
<br /> on screening. Mr.' Saul replied it would, but the Commission is concerned more with the
<br /> uae 9f the rroferty which aite reyiew vrocedures cannot control.
<br /> ~3\o 8/14/72 - 5
<br />
|