Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . ''''~I~\.~~ ,jI'....,. - .....,... <br /> . ACtu-takes .-fh-e po.si tio.n- th~t'-any-- such ordinance Could lead- to vio.latio.n o.f the in- <br /> : di vidual's rights, and that there are sufficient existing laws to. deal with any <br /> ; pro.blems which may arise. Co.pies o.f their respo.nse will be distributed to. Co.uncil <br /> : members. <br /> Manager said from administratio.n' s viewpoint it wo.uld be desirable to. have such an . <br /> o.rdinance sho.uld o.ccasio.n arise. It wo.uld appear to. be very rarely needed, but if <br /> an o.ccasio.n did o.ccur, it wo.uld then be to.o. late to. call the Co.uncil to.gether far <br /> passage o.f the curfew and the City wo.uld be dependent upo.n the Go.verno.r and state <br /> ,law enfo.rcement wi th the pro.babili ty in the event o.f an emergency o.f such size that <br /> the State's peo.ple wo.uld be burdened already with meeting their respo.nsibilities. <br /> , FurtherIlKJre, it is felt such emergencies can be met IlKJre expedi tio.usly because it <br /> wo.uld pro.bably be mare o.f a lo.cal concern. <br /> ,Manager said this type o.f regulatio.n wo.uld have been helpful in the Octo.ber 12,1962 <br /> sto.rm because o.f hazards to. the public in traveling certain streets and, altho.ugh <br /> there are no. anticipated needs, it is a to.o.l which wo.uld be helpful in general <br /> emergencies. He said the City Atto.rney painted aut that its applicatio.n is limited <br /> to. pro.perties dedicated far public use (city streets) and wo.uld no.t affect private <br /> pro.perties o.r publicly-awned private pro.perties, such as the University campus. It <br /> wo.uld restrict the sale o.f alco.ho.lic beverages, gaso.line o.r ather flammable liquids, <br /> ammunitio.n. I <br /> Mr. Mo.hr IlKJved seconded by Mr. Williams to. schedule the pro.po.sed o.rdinance far public <br /> : hearing at the No.vember 6,1972 Co.uncil meeting. <br /> ! Mrs. Beal referred to. the Octo.ber 12 sto.rm and recalled many peo.ple trying to. get . <br /> : to. restaurants because o.f lack o.f co.o.king facilities. She asked who. suggested the <br /> o.rdinance. Manager replied that .it has been under co.nsideratio.n at the administra- <br /> , tive level far same time and that his o.ffice is in agreement with the po.lice Depart- <br /> i ment and Public Wo.rks Department that there are times when this co.uld pro.bably be I <br /> ,used. With reference to. the Octo.ber sto.rm he said that under this o.rdinance there I <br /> . could have been a limited curfew in certain areas, especially in areas where there <br /> 'were electrical lines dawn which were a definite hazard. Citizens co.uld be kept I <br /> fro.m the streets thro.ugh bro.adcasts an emergency radio. equipment and fro.m po.lice <br /> lo.udspeakers. <br />Co.uncilman Mo.hr stated his aversio.n to. making criminal law at the municipal level. <br /> He said he wo.uld no.t want to. see individuals arrested an a charge resulting in their <br /> being jailed simply far walking an a street clo.sed by a curfew. Carom <br /> 19/18/72 <br /> Vo.te was taken an the IlKJtio.n to. schedule public hearing. Mo.tio.n carried, Mrs.Beal .' <br /> 'Appro.ve <br /> voting no.. <br /> , <br /> Co.uncilman Williams suggested deletio.n in Sectio.n 4.760 Definitio.ns (1) (A) o.f the <br /> wards "Rio.t; which means..." if it did no.t substantially change the intent o.f the <br /> o.rdinance. It was his tho.ught that that deletio.n wo.uld pro.tect citizens in terms <' <br /> o.f insurance co.verage because o.f the exclusio.n o.f co.verage far rio.t damage fro.m . <br /> mast policies. Mr. Williams wandered too if the pro vi si an far terminatio.n o.f a ; <br /> . . <br /> curfew sho.uld be extended to. include the Co.uncil as well as the Mayo.r, Co.uncil <br /> President, and City Manager. Manager said the suggested changes wo.uld be checked. <br /> .. <br />G. Vacation, Easement an east. side of---Carmel Avenue '275 feet so.uth o.f MIiida Drive <br /> (Kno.edler) - Planning Co.mmissio.n September 25, 1972 reco.mmended appro.val. Easement <br /> is lo.cated between two. privately awned pro.perties and is no.t needed far utilities. Carom <br /> ,Mr. Mo.hr lOOved seco.nded by Mr. Williams to. call a public hearing an the vacatio.n 10/18/72 <br /> : request. Mo.tio.n carried unanimously. Appro.ve <br />H~Liquo.r License Applicatio.ns <br /> '1.:; Jaqk's Tavern, 24 West 8th - Marian E. Nixo.n requests Retail Malt Beverage Class C Co.mm <br /> , license, greater privilege, which will allo.w sale o.f wine as well as beer. No.w 10/18/72 <br /> has RMBA-PB license. Appro.ve <br /> 2~ Machine Gun Alley, 730 Willamette - Marian P. and Genevieve Nixo.n request Res- <br /> taurant "B" license, greater pri vi lege , which allo.ws dancing and entertainment. <br />(; OLCC repo.rt includes review with adjacent property o.wners - two. abject, two. have <br />" no. o.bjectio.n. Building Department repo.rted pro.blems with meeting building co.de <br /> requirements, which has no. particular bearing an granting greater privilege, Co.mIn .~ <br />i Manager said, and the o.peratio.n wo.uld no.t be allo.wed to. pro.ceed until building :{..0/18/72 <br />t co.de questio.ns are reso.lved. Appro.ve <br />Manager explained that the greater privilege requeste~ (Re~taurant B) far Machine Gun Alley <br />will allaw live entertainment, music, and extend claslng tlme to. 2:30 a.m. <br /> 317 <br /> 10/24/72 - 12 <br />