|
<br />Council Chamber
<br />Eugene, Oregon
<br />December 11, 1972
<br />
<br />. Regular meeting of the Common Council of the city of Eugene, Oregon was called to order by
<br />'. Council President Fred Mohr in the absence of Mayor Anderson at 7: 30 p.m. on December 11,1972
<br />in the Council Chamber with the following councilmen present: Mrs. Beal, Messrs. McDonald,
<br />Teague, Williams, Hershner, Mrs. Campbell, and Mr. Bradshaw.
<br />
<br />I -Invitation, Dinner Honoring Jess Hill - Invitation to dinner honoring Jess Hill, retiring
<br />Lane County Commissioner, was read. It is scheduled for Tuesday, December 12, 1972,
<br />7:00 p.m. at the Eugene Hotel.
<br />
<br />II - Staff Recommendations, Revenue Sharing - Manager noted staff recommendations for use of
<br />monies distributed under revenue sharing were previously mailed to Council members. The
<br />first check has been received ($918,233) for the first six months of 1972, which would
<br />indicate about $1,836,000 will be received for the calendar year 1972. In accordance
<br />with budget laws, a supplemental budget is required if the money is to be used during
<br />the current fiscal year. Although the normal budgeting process must be followed the lay
<br />members of the Budget Committee are not required in the discussions unless the Council
<br />so desires. Manager hoped the budgeting process could begin immediately and decisions
<br />made with regard to whether funds cut from this year's budget would be replaced from
<br />revenue sharing funds. At the conclusion of other business before the Council, it was
<br />~greed to call the Budget Committee into session (including lay members) on Friday,
<br />December 15, at 11:30 a.m.
<br />
<br />. III - Public Hearings
<br />A. Vacation of street 1800 feet north of Royal from 100 feet west of Candlelight
<br />Drive to Cand+elight Drive (Lyndon Homes)
<br />- Planriing Commission recommended approval on October 9, 1972. The property is being
<br />resurveyed. The street, originally dedicated when the subdivision was platted, will
<br />no lonter be needed. No money is involved.
<br />
<br />Council Bill No. 137 - Vacating street 1800 feet north of Royal Avenue from
<br />100 feet west of Candlelight Drive to Candlelight Drive,
<br />was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, there
<br />being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the bill be read the second time by
<br />council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enact-
<br />ment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read
<br />the second time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the bill be approved and given final
<br />passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was dec~ared
<br />passed. and numbered 16667.
<br />
<br />· . . d
<br />. B. Appeal - Northland PUD, Norkenzle and Mln a
<br />Approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 1972.
<br />
<br />Northland PUD, Norkenzie and Minda - Appeal of Marvin P. Brabham, 1709 Minda
<br />Drive, from the Planning Commission decision granting preliminary approval to
<br />Northland Planned Unit Development, located at the southeast corner of Norkenzie
<br />. and Minda, was referred for joint consideration of the Council and Planning Com-
<br />. mission. Objections from residents in the area to the multi-family development
<br />'were based primarily on its effect on surrounding properties.
<br />
<br />Assistant Planning Director pointed out and explained major elements of the
<br />proposed development on a site plan. He said the Commission in its considera-
<br />tion was concerned with density of the project and the crowded effect which
<br />.might occur in allowing 20 dwellings because of the odd shape of the parcel.
<br />The Commission was also concerned with location of the buildings, parking areas,
<br />, proximi ty of the swimming pool to the property line, remote location of play ,
<br />areas from dwelling uni ts. In gi ving preliminary approval the Commission set 1\
<br />: condi tions for the development which it felt would take care of its concerns if
<br />; the condi tions were followed by the developer and observed on the final plan to I
<br />,be presented in the future. Conditions upon which preliminary approval was I
<br />._ granted for 20 dwelling units on about 2.5 acres were (1) landscape buffering I
<br />. ,between the south parking lot and single-family. houses to the east; (2) deletion .
<br />'of swimming pool, or its relocation, with open space recreational area provided I
<br />- tin its place or in centrally located position with ample screening; (3) provi-
<br />sion for children's play area; (4) resolution of Public Works Department concerns
<br />,including (a) additional right-of-way on Norkenzie Road to be dedicated as per
<br />;pxoposed alignment, (b) disposal of portion of tax lot which lies across Norkenzie:
<br />J R9~d or an. i1!l!.:ement to f~y futur~ p,!:v~!l~ <:-nd sidew~~!5_ assessment~L_(C;)__~O!l~tI~UC:-,'
<br />
<br />
<br />3 sf 12/11/72 - 1
<br />
|